
*Huey » 20 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As President Donald Trump continues to hint at taking action to require in-person voting in U.S. elections, Democratic leaders warned that a mail-in ballot ban would place undue hardship on dead voters.
Ever the champions of the rights of deceased voters, Democrats alleged that any move to ban mail-in ballots would disenfranchise millions of dead people who vote Democrat in every American election.
"We can't allow President Trump to alienate our dead voters like this," said Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. "Our late supporters are vital to the success of any Democratic campaign. Banning mail-in ballots will make it far more difficult — if not impossible — for our vast crowds of departed base to make it to the polls in person and cast their votes for Democratic candidates. The Democratic Party itself would be as dead as our supporters."
Other Democrats warned that dead voters are almost completely reliant upon mail-in voting to make their voices heard. "This is such a large pillar of our support," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "President Trump continues to search for ways to rig elections in his favor, but we cannot let him cut off such a large portion of our perished constituents. To all of our dead supporters out there — we will continue to stand up for your right to mail in your votes for Democrats."
At publishing time, Democrats urged the Supreme Court to intervene by ruling that all of their supporters who live in other countries and are not legally allowed to vote be allowed to vote legally.
https://babylonbee.com/news/dems-say-ma ... rce=nypost
Babylon Bee is the best.*Huey » 20 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As President Donald Trump continues to hint at taking action to require in-person voting in U.S. elections, Democratic leaders warned that a mail-in ballot ban would place undue hardship on dead voters.
Ever the champions of the rights of deceased voters, Democrats alleged that any move to ban mail-in ballots would disenfranchise millions of dead people who vote Democrat in every American election.
"We can't allow President Trump to alienate our dead voters like this," said Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. "Our late supporters are vital to the success of any Democratic campaign. Banning mail-in ballots will make it far more difficult — if not impossible — for our vast crowds of departed base to make it to the polls in person and cast their votes for Democratic candidates. The Democratic Party itself would be as dead as our supporters."
Other Democrats warned that dead voters are almost completely reliant upon mail-in voting to make their voices heard. "This is such a large pillar of our support," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "President Trump continues to search for ways to rig elections in his favor, but we cannot let him cut off such a large portion of our perished constituents. To all of our dead supporters out there — we will continue to stand up for your right to mail in your votes for Democrats."
At publishing time, Democrats urged the Supreme Court to intervene by ruling that all of their supporters who live in other countries and are not legally allowed to vote be allowed to vote legally.
https://babylonbee.com/news/dems-say-ma ... rce=nypost
So **** g'ddammned stupid....
Ready to answer now?
Since when do you ever answer anything? For example:
There's the example of the definition of survivorship bias in my own words.Vegas » 20 Aug 2025, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Since when do you ever answer anything? For example:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Mine is irrelevant. If you are confident in yours, then use it. How many **** times......Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ There's the example of the definition of survivorship bias in my own words.
Where's yours?
It's overdue.
Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ It's overdue.
And non-existent.
Admit to everyone that you've lied about it.
You use it, then.Vegas » 20 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ So you can use it to help you? **** off. Figure it out yourself.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
I already know the answer. You don't. Clearly.
I do...clearly.
You can have it. He has been running from me four days now.Vegas » 20 Aug 2025, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Mary is back again. I wonder if it was both of us this time. I pissed her off something fierce this morning after I handed her a healthy curb stomping. You usually trigger her anyway, but if you don't mind, I would like to share in the glory this time.
@Blackvegetable
*Huey » 20 Aug 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You are not very good at ignoring me when you still read my threads and posts.