Yea....that block lettering is like Woke took a **** in your eye.Cannonpointer » 28 Aug 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ I'm guessing you're referring to a fox host. I don't watch that ****. But I HAVE enjoyed cracker barrel, and I am not a person who is generally resistant to change. I just don't like change based on stupid ****.
I celebrated when Dollar Tree started raising prices. I'm old enough to remember the five and dimes - and to lament their failure to adapt. Change is the only constant, and as such it should be more the object of reverence than of resistance. But when there's a whiff of woke **** in the mix, my nose rebels. The change we most need is more rope and more trees.
Prove what?Vegas » 28 Aug 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ You have no way of proving that, so shut up. I was able to prove it, by your own admission.
1. You will now turn it on me.
It's a disrespect of Cracker Barrel's customer base and a rebuke of their values.Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Yea....that block lettering is like Woke took a **** in your eye.
Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2025, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Prove what?
That video argues, quite persuasively, that you're a moron.
It argues that questions are an essential element of critical analysis.Vegas » 28 Aug 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Prediction fulfilled. 100% accuracy. QED
So **** easy. So **** stupid.
One question. And you can't even prove that you answered it the first time.
I remember its numerous failed iterations.Vegas » 28 Aug 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ One question. And you can't even prove that you answered it the first time.
And no, ****. I am not going to prove a negative you stupid asshole.
Remember this?
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
I don't see your answer. No surprise. You don't answer questions the first time. Never. At all.
Do you deny that you're a coward?Vegas » 28 Aug 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑![]()
It's not uncommon for you to project, but this is a classic example of one of your blatant projections.
So **** stupid.
Hides behind a question again, and this is what he asks ^^^
I notice that you didn't answer it.Vegas » 28 Aug 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Hides behind a question again, and this is what he asks ^^^
The cowardice and hypocrisy are now more than blatant...they're flagrant.
https://media1.tenor.com/m/8tzn6Oirnc0AAAAC/bruh-no.gifBlackvegetable » 28 Aug 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ It argues that questions are an essential element of critical analysis.
But you refuse to answer them.
Is that a fat kid in your pocket?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!