Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 10:24 am

We are talking about the fact a private school failed to protect its students from a perceived threat.

I thought YOU were talking about the funding for private schools to protect their students.  Want me to repost it again?  Yeah, just like that other guy.

 

MR-7 » 30 Aug 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 10:25 am

@roshambo says she voted for TRUMP.

I read that.  I think it is BS.

Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 10:27 am

*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 8:00 am

Many catholic schools have income based tuition so that poor students can attend.  In my day it meant my mother had to do volunteer work at the school.  So no, in terms of catholic schools you are off base.

It would be very courageous of you to speak your truth about what the priests did to you.

You have a supportive community here. This is the perfect place to be vulnerable.     
 
 

 

Things is they never did anything.

*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 10:27 am

I thought YOU were talking about the funding for private schools to protect their students.  Want me to repost it again?  Yeah, just like that other guy.

Exactly what I am talking about. And the private school failed to protect its students form a perceived threat.
The blood is on the hands of the school and those that failed to attempt to protect the students. Certainly not on Tim Walz as the OP claims.

*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 10:32 am

Exactly what I am talking about. And the private school failed to protect its students form a perceived threat.
The blood is on the hands of the school and those that failed to attempt to protect the students. Certainly not on Tim Walz as the OP claims.

Saint Timmy, who did not want to allocate funds.  I guess he had to spend the money on the tampons in the boys room.

Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 8:14 am

You're the one who listens to a "news" station that calls Bruce Jenner a girl, fruitcake. 

Own your own weakness, girl.

You mean the station that is now run by a leftist CEO?

Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2025, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 8:13 am

Yeah yeah - WE'RE the ones causing you to take stands that you run away from defending.   

Is that an open mind or just a hole in yer dictator loving head?       
 

*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 10:36 am

Saint Timmy, who did not want to allocate funds.  I guess he had to spend the money on the tampons in the boys room.

Per Minnesota constitution funds are forbade for allocation. FOX news failed to mention this.


 

Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 8:14 am

You're the one who listens to a "news" station that calls Bruce Jenner a girl, fruitcake. 

Own your own weakness, girl.

They also say Rosie O'donnel, Ellen DeGeneres, and Michael Obama are girls too.   
 

*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 11:35 am

Per Minnesota constitution funds are forbade for allocation. FOX news failed to mention this.

I have no clue what FOX news has to say about it.  What has bloombrg told you?

I do know that two bills in the MN house and Senate 23 and 24 discussed this subject and the proposals stalled.
 

MR-7 » 30 Aug 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 9:44 am

The article talks about the shooter being "trans" (GAY). @roshambo never watched the entire clip, or he would know this.

He was a **** fruitcake who wrote in his manifesto that he was sick and needed help...now MN legislators are asking for a "special session" to legislate more stupid **** gun controls vs addressing these sexual pedo groomer administrators / teachers / counselors / medical people...      
 

*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 3:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 3:38 am

I answered your first question
Your video is informative; however, it is unrelated to the current topic. The discussion revolves around a video asserting that Tim Walz failed to heed or address requests for funding to improve security at non-public schools.

Hey...if you have kids then send them to yer beloved Trans supporting schools.

Ever seen those school lotteries where some parents gain entry to a good private school...it's primarly black schools that suffer the most. And when they don't win the lottery the parents and their kids break down in tears.

Looks like they don't agree with you.

*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 9:53 am

You have shown that I won't work up that much of an appetite dealing with the likes of you.

 

*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 9:51 am

*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 9:50 am

If you wish to runaway now, that's fine.  I simply went down the road YOU took the conversation.  You an ignorant comment concerning the school in question.  

No, if you don't wish to go further down the cluster **** rabbit hole YOU created I suggest YOU return later.  YOU sir, are quite confused.

Pack a lunch kid, I got all day
6th grade?

 

Still don't need that lunch yet.

Minnesota is not required to pay for security for private schools; instead, a recent bill (SF 2480 in 2023) aimed to increase safe schools funding and create security system grants for school districts, which would include public and private entities within the definition of "school" for grant purposes, though the legislation does not mandate direct payment for private school security. Private schools in Minnesota are responsible for their own security measures, but can potentially access grants or funding programs established by the state to support safety initiatives, according to the MN Revisor's Office.

Of course i want to know why the private schools did not apply for a grant. The children’s blood is on the hands of the private school. Certainly not on Tim Walz as the OP claims. FOX news failed to mention this. That is far from fair and balanced.


@ROG62  

*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 11:42 am

Still don't need that lunch yet.

This is a debate. Spectate.
 

USAID was funding this project.....Not anymore!

In Boko Haram's birthplace, USAID cut threatens a school for its victims

MR-7 » 30 Aug 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 11:46 am

USAID was funding this project.....Not anymore!

In Boko Haram's birthplace, USAID cut threatens a school for its victims

I mean, why should our tax dollars help those "private schools" in other countries?
 

roadkill » 30 Aug 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 11:40 am

Hey...if you have kids then send them to yer beloved Trans supporting schools.

Ever seen those school lotteries where some parents gain entry to a good private school...it's primarly black schools that suffer the most. And when they don't win the lottery the parents and their kids break down in tears.

Looks like they don't agree with you.

Front row is fine as long as you remain silent

MR-7 » 30 Aug 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

30 Aug 2025, 11:46 am

USAID was funding this project.....Not anymore!

In Boko Haram's birthplace, USAID cut threatens a school for its victims

And… what does this have to do with your claim against Tim Walz?