Non-public schoolroadkill » 30 Aug 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Hey...if you have kids then send them to yer beloved Trans supporting schools.
Ever seen those school lotteries where some parents gain entry to a good private school...it's primarly black schools that suffer the most. And when they don't win the lottery the parents and their kids break down in tears.
Looks like they don't agree with you.
Third grade
https://www.ed.gov/birth-grade-12-educa ... me-schools*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ You are not capable of debate.
The original poster inaccurately asserts that Mr. Walz was responsible for the safety of the children.
The children were actually under the care of a private school that did not ensure their protection. The private school requested financial support for security measures but did not obtain the necessary funding. Had the private school treated the threats with the seriousness they warranted, they would have arranged for their own security personnel. I anticipate that a lawsuit will emerge, with the private school as the defendant.
The floor is yours
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Cannonpointer » 30 Aug 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ O-o-o-o-klahoma where the wind comes sweeping down the plains...
CLANG CLANG CLANG went the TROLLEEEEEE...![]()
![]()
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom *Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑Per Minnesota constitution funds are forbade for allocation. FOX news failed to mention this.*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Saint Timmy, who did not want to allocate funds. I guess he had to spend the money on the tampons in the boys room.
*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑I have no clue what FOX news has to say about it. What has bloombrg told you?*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Per Minnesota constitution funds are forbade for allocation. FOX news failed to mention this.
I do know that two bills in the MN house and Senate 23 and 24 discussed this subject and the proposals stalled.
*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ Minnesota is not required to pay for security for private schools; instead, a recent bill (SF 2480 in 2023) aimed to increase safe schools funding and create security system grants for school districts, which would include public and private entities within the definition of "school" for grant purposes, though the legislation does not mandate direct payment for private school security. Private schools in Minnesota are responsible for their own security measures, but can potentially access grants or funding programs established by the state to support safety initiatives, according to the MN Revisor's Office.
Of course i want to know why the private schools did not apply for a grant. The children’s blood is on the hands of the private school. Certainly not on Tim Walz as the OP claims. FOX news failed to mention this. That is far from fair and balanced.
Google AI:
Meanwhile, Walz signed other measures into law that same year. OutFront Minnesota reported he directed taxpayer dollars toward creating a “trans refuge” to support individuals seeking gender-affirming care, alongside signing a ban on conversion therapy into law.*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Saint Timmy, who did not want to allocate funds. I guess he had to spend the money on the tampons in the boys room.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom See previous post. Minnesota law forbids funding of security for non-public schools. Grants are available. The blood of the dead is on those that did not apply for the grants and or provide security for the perceived threat. FOX news failed to tell you this.
Post it...*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ Per Minnesota constitution funds are forbade for allocation. FOX news failed to mention this.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom It's Stumpy for sure. What a **** Moran!
I did
I saw that as well. I don't think **** is intellectually prepared for this discussion. It is much more important to create a safe haven for trannies than it is to protect schools.ROG62 » 30 Aug 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑Meanwhile, Walz signed other measures into law that same year. OutFront Minnesota reported he directed taxpayer dollars toward creating a “trans refuge” to support individuals seeking gender-affirming care, alongside signing a ban on conversion therapy into law.*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Saint Timmy, who did not want to allocate funds. I guess he had to spend the money on the tampons in the boys room.
https://yournews.com/2025/08/29/3803122 ... s-reports/
a new hire...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I already alluded to this fact.*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑
Google AI:
can mn fund security for private religious schools
AI Overview
Yes, Minnesota can potentially fund security for private religious schools, though it may be limited or subject to specific regulations. While there's ongoing discussion about increasing funding after recent events, existing federal grants and some state safety grants are available and could be used by private schools, including religious ones, for security upgrades and violence prevention measures
What else ya got?
*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑I already alluded to this fact.*Huey » 30 Aug 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑
Google AI:
can mn fund security for private religious schools
AI Overview
Yes, Minnesota can potentially fund security for private religious schools, though it may be limited or subject to specific regulations. While there's ongoing discussion about increasing funding after recent events, existing federal grants and some state safety grants are available and could be used by private schools, including religious ones, for security upgrades and violence prevention measures
What else ya got?
I also showed you it is forbade in the Minnesota constitution to fund it. I showed you grants are available for this. The fact remains is the blood of the dead children is on those that didn’t protect the children even though grants were available to fund it. Certainly the blood of the dead is not on Tim Walz.
You need to let it out. You're safe. This is a safe spaceI am holding for you.
I don't watch FNC, you stupid ****..*Roshambo » 30 Aug 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ See previous post. Minnesota law forbids funding of security for non-public schools. Grants are available. The blood of the dead is on those that did not apply for the grants and or provide security for the perceived threat. FOX news failed to tell you this.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yes, I mean that station - which was owned by the same family that had 150 OTHER channels that were all global warnings all the time.