Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑ You gave non-answers. And we both know why. It's a narcissist thing.
You need to defend it anyway.
Need implies a rule....You need to defend it anyway.
That must mean we're done here.
Not a chance. Your deflections don't work with me. **** your stalling.
I've provided a definition, in my own words.Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ Not a chance. Your deflections don't work with me. **** your stalling.
Acknowledge that you don't know what survivorship bias is, then we are done.
You have done no such thing.Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ I've provided a definition, in my own words.
You can't even provide an example...in trying, you exposed yourself as a complete idiot.
Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ I've provided a definition, in my own words.
You can't even provide an example...in trying, you exposed yourself as a complete idiot.
That's right, your comment doesn't EARN you an answer...now ****...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom