Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Criminal cases based solely on an alleged occupancy fraud are unusual but not unheard of, said Stephen Cazares, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense lawyer at Foundation Law Group. He said mortgage fraud cases usually relate to allegations that borrowers overstated their assets and income to get better terms, rather than misstating a primary residence.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... accused-of
Sounds familiar...
@Deezer ShooveVegas » 02 Sep 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Now you are spamming Deezer.
I understand that you're scrambling for justifications, but Grifty has just declared himself less fit than the person he is trying to oust.Fuelman » 02 Sep 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Usually, but not 100% of the time or Doomberg would have said so.
Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Criminal cases based solely on an alleged occupancy fraud are unusual but not unheard of, said Stephen Cazares, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense lawyer at Foundation Law Group. He said mortgage fraud cases usually relate to allegations that borrowers overstated their assets and income to get better terms, rather than misstating a primary residence.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... accused-of
Sounds familiar...
No...
I am not the one tagging him you idiot.
No Dum Dum, he removed the tag. Like I did. You are the only one spamming.Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ No...
You are.
Fortunately, Deezer Shoove thinks it's funny.
*Huey » 02 Sep 2025, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ No Dum Dum, he removed the tag. Like I did. You are the only one spamming.
I am not surprised. What can we expect from a guy that says and does the same **** day after day?*Huey » 02 Sep 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ When I first put the * in front of my name Dum Dum though I had deleted all of my posts. He was never that bright when it came to the forum tools.
It took over 6 months to get him to understand how to use the reply function and WYSIWYG to format your posts.
Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑rippy 38 avatar rippy 38 -1 less than a minute ago
Which mincing coward do you belong to, Sok?
*Huey » 02 Sep 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Just to get you to stop whining and crying about it I gave you a greenie. Do you need a tissue?
Here's something else that sounds familiar....you're stupid.Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Criminal cases based solely on an alleged occupancy fraud are unusual but not unheard of, said Stephen Cazares, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense lawyer at Foundation Law Group. He said mortgage fraud cases usually relate to allegations that borrowers overstated their assets and income to get better terms, rather than misstating a primary residence.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... accused-of
Sounds familiar...
Yes...it does sound very familiar. Trump was totally innocent and Stumpy's heros belong in prison for accussing Trump while dems were actually committing these crimes.Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Criminal cases based solely on an alleged occupancy fraud are unusual but not unheard of, said Stephen Cazares, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense lawyer at Foundation Law Group. He said mortgage fraud cases usually relate to allegations that borrowers overstated their assets and income to get better terms, rather than misstating a primary residence.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... accused-of
Sounds familiar...
