Liberal Forum

roadkill » 02 Sep 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:31 pm

Yes...it does sound very familiar.   Trump was totally innocent and Stumpy's heros belong in prison for accussing Trump while dems were actually committing these crimes.   

Don't let Stumpy sneak away from this one.   

Grifty was indicted and found liable...by a jury.

I can appreciate why that distinction is lost on morons.
 
That kid looks like she wants out of your van...

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm

Grifty was indicted and found liable...by a jury.

I can appreciate why that distinction is lost on morons.
 
That kid looks like she wants out of your van...

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors   

Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:52 pm

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors   

@Deezer Shoove  


Your pet has a question 

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:55 pm

 

Your pet has a question

Stop begging for his help to answer it. It's bad enough that you demand me to answer it for you. 

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm

Grifty was indicted and found liable...by a jury.

I can appreciate why that distinction is lost on morons.
 
That kid looks like she wants out of your van...

Typical leftist...who is the actual owner/operator of the van.

Explain "liable" with all the evidence you have.  Evidence Stumpy...NOT leftwing consensus.      
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm

roadkill » 02 Sep 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:31 pm

Yes...it does sound very familiar.   Trump was totally innocent and Stumpy's heros belong in prison for accussing Trump while dems were actually committing these crimes.   

Don't let Stumpy sneak away from this one.   

Grifty was indicted and found liable...by a jury.

I can appreciate why that distinction is lost on morons.
 
That kid looks like she wants out of your van...

 

And everyone made money.  I guess they are guilty also.  The only one complaining, Bitch, is you and Letitia James.  You are a bitter, petty, LITTLE person.

I almost said mon, but it is well known, from your family to this forum, you ain't much of a man.

*Huey » 02 Sep 2025, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 4:20 pm

And everyone made money.  I guess they are guilty also.  The only one complaining, Bitch, is you and Letitia James.  You are a bitter, petty, LITTLE person.

I almost said mon, but it is well known, from your family to this forum, you ain't much of a man.

   Can you even begin to imagine what it would be like working with him? He must have had dozens of complaints filed against him. An HR nightmare.   

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm

Criminal cases based solely on an alleged occupancy fraud are unusual but not unheard of, said Stephen Cazares, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense lawyer at Foundation Law Group. He said mortgage fraud cases usually relate to allegations that borrowers overstated their assets and income to get better terms, rather than misstating a primary residence. 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... accused-of

Sounds familiar...

Nope, it doesn't sound 'familiar" seeing how TRUMP'S CASE did NOT DEFRAUD A SINGLE PERSON!! Even the APPEALS COURT SAID AS MUCH!!

But MORTGAGE FRAUD by stating 2-3 places are your PRIMARY RESIDENCE when you can only LIVE IN ONE AS PRIMARY is a CRIME that can be found in US STATUTES!!

Please, stop trying to be relevant as you keep getting your bails kicked into your throat with this kind of crap you post. Or did your EX run off iwth those too as souvenirs of a gutless POS??
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm

Criminal cases based solely on an alleged occupancy fraud are unusual but not unheard of, said Stephen Cazares, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense lawyer at Foundation Law Group. He said mortgage fraud cases usually relate to allegations that borrowers overstated their assets and income to get better terms, rather than misstating a primary residence. 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... accused-of

Sounds familiar...

Hey TDS Fake News Dickhead...

Times up on this thread....it's past the normal fake news shelf life of your average thread.

Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 4:24 pm

   Can you even begin to imagine what it would be like working with him? He must have had dozens of complaints filed against him. An HR nightmare.

To be honest it wouldn’t be him working with me.  It would be him working FOR me.  I also live in an at will state so he would have been shown the door years ago.

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm

Criminal cases based solely on an alleged occupancy fraud are unusual but not unheard of, said Stephen Cazares, a former federal prosecutor who is now a defense lawyer at Foundation Law Group. He said mortgage fraud cases usually relate to allegations that borrowers overstated their assets and income to get better terms, rather than misstating a primary residence. 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... accused-of

Sounds familiar...

Unusual, not unheard of. That describes cannibalism.

Doesn't defend it, though. 

The "victim" in Trump's case was not injureded, did not bring a case, was not a complaining witness, and testifed it would still do business with the guy whom the state alleged had victimized it.

Now THAT is unusual - but thanks EXCLUSIVELY to the malicious prosecution of Donald Trump, not unheard of. 

Try again, fruitcake. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:48 pm

Grifty was indicted and found liable...by a jury.

 

Lie.
 

*Huey » 02 Sep 2025, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 2:42 pm

Letitia James understated her Brooklyn property to get better terms.  The difference being she got lower rates and government assistance.  So lenders lost money as did the tax payer.

Didn't she lie that she was an in-state resident to get a sweet deal on a residence in Virginia where she did not live - a deliberate lie on a legal document, and her a bar member and a government official?
 
Edit - never mind. Same crime, different *** woman. 

That weak, tiny-foot bitch put up a link that is behind a paywall, so I assumed he was referring to a whole different overweight she-boon.

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 2:40 pm

Which mincing coward do you belong to, Sok?

*Huey » 02 Sep 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 3:09 pm

Just to get you to stop whining and crying about it I gave you a greenie.  Do you need a tissue?

 

Cannonpointer » 02 Sep 2025, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 6:03 pm

Didn't she lie that she was an in-state resident to get a sweet deal on a residence in Virginia where she did not live - a deliberate lie on a legal document, and her a bar member and a government official?
 
Edit - never mind. Same crime, different *** woman. 

That weak, tiny-foot bitch put up a link that is behind a paywall, so I assumed he was referring to a whole different overweight she-boon.

Most definitely...  

Cannonpointer » 02 Sep 2025, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 6:03 pm

Didn't she lie that she was an in-state resident to get a sweet deal on a residence in Virginia where she did not live - a deliberate lie on a legal document, and her a bar member and a government official?
 
Edit - never mind. Same crime, different *** woman. 

That weak, tiny-foot bitch put up a link that is behind a paywall, so I assumed he was referring to a whole different overweight she-boon.

That weak, tiny-foot bitch put up a link that is behind a paywall,

Yea....

About sources....

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 2:39 pm

I understand that you're scrambling for justifications, but Grifty has just declared himself less fit than the person he is trying to oust.

Sounds more like you are the one scrambling, trying to justify it's ok for a Fed board member to not understand what "primary residence" means. What else doesn't she understand?

This isn't new, the Biden Administration knew about this and pushed her nomination through as a DEI hire anyway. Kaka being the tiebreaker in the Senate.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 8:25 am

Yea....

About sources....

the bitch is going to jail

And then there is this second referral:

The new criminal referral, made late Thursday and revealed in a social media post by Federal Housing Finance Agency director Bill Pulte, alleges Cook identified a property in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a second home on official documents, but instead used it as an investment property.

Second homes receive lower mortgage costs than investment properties, because investment properties are inherently riskier.

The loan docs don't lie.