Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 12:38 pm

Coozie wheezed something about "last chance"...

For you. He quoted you , not me you dumb mother ****. 

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 12:39 pm

For you. He quoted you , not me you dumb mother ****.

Why would that idiot threaten me?

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 12:43 pm

Why would that idiot threaten me?

You moron. Take a wild guess. Your lack of self-awareness is overwhelming. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 12:43 pm

Why would that idiot threaten me?

Here is a hint:

Breaking News: Mods in Peril. Please help Deezer!!! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 12:47 pm

Here is a hint:

Breaking News: Mods in Peril. Please help Deezer!!! - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Because you're spamming?

Why doesn't he bitch at you?

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:02 pm

Because you're spamming?

Why doesn't he bitch at you?

       

Two questions again. 

All you have to do is answer...that's it. And then it stops. But you don't answer questions...at least not the first time. Obviously. 

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:04 pm

       

Two questions again. 

All you have to do is answer...that's it. And then it stops. But you don't answer questions...at least not the first time. Obviously.

That's a lie.

I've already answered...
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 9:46 am

This is big news, MAGAts...

isn't  the dope smoking 9th, this is the Reactionary Safe Space.

This sets up a potentially interesting conflict should SCOTUS consider it.

Yeah...very interesting...like yer never ending search for slings and arrows.     

This time for sure???

Stumpy is cleaning out all his past sources...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP4abiHdQpc

 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:05 pm

I've already answered...

And this was my prediction. And look at this ^^^ 100% accuracy. 

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:06 pm

And this was my prediction. And look at this ^^^ 100% accuracy.

But I have...

You've acknowledged it.

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:10 pm

But I have...

You've acknowledged it.

Nope. 

Show me your 1 letter answer, not your 3 non-answers.
Show me your defense of this one answer

And "because it fit my definition" is not a defense. That is a claim. Defend it. 

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:12 pm

Nope. 

Show me your 1 letter answer, not your 3 non-answers.
Show me your defense of this one answer

And "because it fit my definition" is not a defense. That is a claim. Defend it.

If I tell you which are wrong, I've answered your question. 

You're not owed a defense, or even an answer....
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:13 pm

If I tell you which are wrong, I've answered your question. 

You're not owed a defense, or even an answer....

No, you didn't. **** that tactic. If you can say that, then you can say which is the correct one. 

We both know why you won't. It's about control. You need to have control. I won't give it to you. 

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:16 pm

No, you didn't. **** that tactic. If you can say that, then you can say which is the correct one. 


 

That is correct.

You've just acknowledged that I know the right answer.

Which means you can only be asking because you don't. 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:21 pm

That is correct.

You've just acknowledged that I know the right answer.

Which means you can only be asking because you don't.

Nope. I am acknowledging that you are giving the wrong answers. You have acknowledged the same. 

I am not giving you control that you desperately need.  I am not letting you off with that. 

A 133 page dissent suggests he is trying to provide all possible ammunition to the Bought&Paid Four when it gets to them.

But at its core, it's the same **** rationale for which Aileen Cannon received a brutal taint punt from senior judges.

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:26 pm

A 133 page dissent suggests he is trying to provide all possible ammunition to the Bought&Paid Four when it gets to them.

But at its core, it's the same **** rationale for which Aileen Cannon received a brutal taint punt from senior judges.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:25 pm

Nope. I am acknowledging that you are giving the wrong answers. You have acknowledged the same. 

I am not giving you control that you desperately need.  I am not letting you off with that.

If I list the three wrong answers, that only leaves one...

Only an idiot would struggle with that...

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:27 pm

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Hasn't @Deezer Shoove  suffered enough?

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:30 pm

If I list the three wrong answers, that only leaves one...

Only an idiot would struggle with that...

Yeah, you said that already and I already addressed it, not even one post ago. 

Get Matched With a Therapist That Fits Your Needs, Style, and Goals

Why Narcissists Repeat The Same Tired Patterns