Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:31 pm

Hasn't suffered enough?

Nobody is forcing you to beg for his help. 
 

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:33 pm

Nobody is forcing you to beg for his help.

We just proved that you understand that I don't need his help.

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:39 pm

We just proved that you understand that I don't need his help.

   
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 9:12 am

A federal appeals court late Tuesday rejected President Trump’s attempts to use an 18th-century wartime law to deport immigrants he has accused of belonging to a violent Venezuelan street gang. 

The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, was the first time that federal appellate judges had weighed in on the substantive question of whether Mr. Trump had properly invoked the law, the Alien Enemies Act, as part of his aggressive deportation agenda. While the ruling by a divided three-judge panel of one of the most conservative courts in the country was a defeat for the administration, the issue was still likely to be heard by the Supreme Court.

The third judge on the panel, Andrew S. Oldham, a Trump appointee, wrote a 131-page dissent in which he assailed his colleagues for questioning the president’s authority. 

“Today the majority holds that President Trump is just an ordinary civil litigant,” Oldham wrote. “His declaration of a predatory incursion is not conclusive. Far from it. Rather, President Trump must plead sufficient facts — as if he were some run-of-the-mill plaintiff in a breach-of-contract case — to convince a federal judge that he is entitled to relief.”

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/03/us/trump-news

I understand why these reactionary whores in robes want to facilitate Grifty's excesses, but I don't understand the rationale of Deference. 

A judicial proceeding is an "adversarial" event. The contestants are not people, but the arguments they present. As such, the idea that one side proceeds from a position of Divine Favor should be readily rejected.

Anyway, when you are finished with your tantrum, go ahead and beg for our help again.

Chop-chop. Let's go...



Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm

Anyway, when you are finished with your tantrum, go ahead and beg for our help again.

Chop-chop. Let's go...

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

you already admitted that I've answered..

Who is "we"?

You, and your sponsor, @Deezer Shoove ?
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:46 pm

you already admitted that I've answered..

Nope. I admitted that you gave the wrong answers. See prediction 2 for your next response. 


Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.
 
 

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:49 pm

Nope. I admitted that you gave the wrong answers. See prediction 2 for your next response. 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

I understand that it is not enough for you to deduce the correct answer, but that cannot be my problem. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:52 pm

I understand that it is not enough for you to deduce the correct answer, but that cannot be my problem.

Narcissists won't accept their control being taken from them. ^^^

Tough ****. This won't stop until you do it right. Not my problem. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:52 pm

Deezer help me! Help me! I can't get away from a question...Help! Help! Help!

The extent you will go to evade a question is insufferable. You literally are demanding a mod to put a stop to a question for you. 

Your cowardice runs so deep, that you will literally go to these extremes.     


All you have to do is the answer it the right way with your defense. That's it. Then it's done. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 10:56 am

You got out from under your brother for THAT?

^^^^ *** makes no sense...