Liberal Forum

I wish everyday Americans could see what this really looks like.

This is Civil War.  I back the Power of the States.  As Trump did in the process of doing everything he could to weaken them.

If I were in the Texas National Guard I would go AWOL in protest. This ain't America.. Since the Posse Comi Ta-Ta's Act in the first CW. Guys, he is asking you to break your oath and sell your jesus to the devil in the process.

He is using a red states military against a blue state. this ain't right. It's facism 100%
 
 

JohnnyYou » 03 Sep 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:02 pm

I wish everyday Americans could see what this really looks like.

This is Civil War.  I back the Power of the States.  As Trump did in the process of doing everything he could to weaken them.

If I were in the Texas National Guard I would go AWOL in protest. This ain't America.. Since the Posse Comiwhatis in the first CW.

He is using a red states military against a blue state. this ain't right. It's facism 100%

Any chance that you would have a link?

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:03 pm

Any chance that you would have a link?

Every "no spam" in my content is a blocked link. Edit:  At least they were there this morning.  There were links in the paste from AI below.  She says "searching 9 sites, reading 57 articles" and wallah!.

There is a 4K character limit.. Links can eat them up.. Mr-7's can be 2000 characters long.

Looks like I am trolled..  We need boots on the highways watching for trucks and equipment.  We do have cameras. We should be able to detect convoys.  Unless they get disabled on the banned shelf in the library.  Sole's girfriend would see a closed loop fake. She might even detect green camofauge large vehicles.

Has the Texas National Guard Deployed to Chicago?
As of September 3, 2025, the Texas National Guard has not been deployed to Chicago, but conflicting reports and statements from political figures have created a tense and unclear situation
. 
Claims of deployment preparations

• Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker: On September 2, 2025, Pritzker said he had "reason to believe" that the Texas National Guard was being staged for deployment to Illinois. He alleged that this was part of a larger plan by former President Donald Trump to deploy federal agents and military personnel to the city for political purposes, framing it as "terror and cruelty".
• Former President Donald Trump: Speaking at the White House on September 2, Trump stated, "We're going in" when asked about sending the National Guard to Chicago, though he did not provide a timeline. 

Denial of deployment

• KVUE-TV (Austin, Texas): On September 3, the Austin-based TV station reported that the Texas National Guard is not planning to send troops to Illinois. The report contrasts with Pritzker's claim and cites sources indicating no such mission is being planned. 

Legal and political context

• Federal Court Ruling: The situation follows a federal judge ruling that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was illegal, as there was no evidence of rebellion or incapacity of local law enforcement. This ruling could create legal challenges for any similar action in Chicago.
• Constitutional Issues: Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul stated that only Congress has the authority to federalize the National Guard under certain circumstances, which he says do not exist in Chicago.
• Local Opposition: Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has stated that the Chicago Police Department will not collaborate with any National Guard troops or federal agents if they are deployed to the city without his consent.
• Reason for Intervention: The rhetoric around federal intervention and deployment of forces comes in the wake of a recent violent Labor Day weekend in Chicago, though city crime data shows a general decline in violent crime.

 
 

JohnnyYou » 03 Sep 2025, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:08 pm

Every "no spam" in my content is a blocked link.

There is a 4K character limit.. Links can eat them up.. Mr-7's can be 2000 characters long.

Looks like I am trolled..  We need boots on the highways watching for trucks and equipment.  We do have cameras. We should be able to detect convoys.  Unless they get disabled on the banned shelf in the library.  Sole's girfriend would see a closed loop fake. She might even detect green camofauge large vehicles.

Has the Texas National Guard Deployed to Chicago?
As of September 3, 2025, the Texas National Guard has not been deployed to Chicago, but conflicting reports and statements from political figures have created a tense and unclear situation
. 
Claims of deployment preparations

• Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker: On September 2, 2025, Pritzker said he had "reason to believe" that the Texas National Guard was being staged for deployment to Illinois. He alleged that this was part of a larger plan by former President Donald Trump to deploy federal agents and military personnel to the city for political purposes, framing it as "terror and cruelty".
• Former President Donald Trump: Speaking at the White House on September 2, Trump stated, "We're going in" when asked about sending the National Guard to Chicago, though he did not provide a timeline. 

Denial of deployment

• KVUE-TV (Austin, Texas): On September 3, the Austin-based TV station reported that the Texas National Guard is not planning to send troops to Illinois. The report contrasts with Pritzker's claim and cites sources indicating no such mission is being planned. 

Legal and political context

• Federal Court Ruling: The situation follows a federal judge ruling that Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles was illegal, as there was no evidence of rebellion or incapacity of local law enforcement. This ruling could create legal challenges for any similar action in Chicago.
• Constitutional Issues: Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul stated that only Congress has the authority to federalize the National Guard under certain circumstances, which he says do not exist in Chicago.
• Local Opposition: Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has stated that the Chicago Police Department will not collaborate with any National Guard troops or federal agents if they are deployed to the city without his consent.
• Reason for Intervention: The rhetoric around federal intervention and deployment of forces comes in the wake of a recent violent Labor Day weekend in Chicago, though city crime data shows a general decline in violent crime.

Wow. I'll be following this. 

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:11 pm

Wow. I'll be following this.

#metoo    Maybe I was touched too much by Meidas Network.  The feed landscape is going full Mad Max Thunderdome. MAGA jerks off to their news feed with a Cult 45 in the recliner.  News Smacks.  One Asshole Network. etc... As long as Jesus is thumbs up, you can watch it.

MSNBC is history. I have not seen Ari Melber in months.  Lawrence O'Donnell was always a favorite.l The Algorithm has him silenced.

Are there any groups watching american highways for movement f national guard troops?
While specific "watchdog" groups are not publicly known for exclusively tracking National Guard movements on highways, multiple groups and individuals may informally monitor or document them due to current events and public interest
. However, formal tracking is handled by official government agencies and the military itself. 
Formal government tracking

• Defense Movement Coordinator (DMC): Each state has a National Guard DMC who officially monitors and approves all convoys on public highways within their state.
• State Department of Transportation (SDOT): These agencies are informed of planned National Guard convoy movements to help monitor and manage traffic flow, particularly if the convoys involve oversize or overweight vehicles.
• Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) and Traffic Management Centers (TMCs): These systems, utilized by SDOTs, use technologies like GPS and CCTV to monitor traffic conditions, including military vehicles, and can relay this information to military and civilian drivers.
• Movement Tracking System (MTS): The military uses its own satellite-based tracking and communication system to monitor the location of its vehicles in real-time. 

Informal monitoring by the public
Public interest in the movement of National Guard troops often increases during major events such as: 

• Political protests or civil unrest
• Natural disasters
• Border patrol operations
• Large-scale military exercises

During these times, civilians, including independent journalists, activists, or even members of online communities, might document and share sightings of military convoys on social media or forums. This informal monitoring is not systematically organized but occurs as a side effect of heightened public awareness. 
It is important to note that most military vehicle movements on US highways are routine training exercises or logistical transfers and are not indicative of an unusual event. 
 
 
 

Ok, I gotta see what Texas has for traffic cams..
 But it's useless for me here @Vegas  

I am the digital parapalegic.   Even if I could catch a screen shot, I couldnt share it.

Texas doesn't seem to have an interactive map like Maryland.

its.txdot.gov/its/District/cameras
 

JohnnyYou » 03 Sep 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:02 pm

I wish everyday Americans could see what this really looks like.

This is Civil War.  I back the Power of the States.  As Trump did in the process of doing everything he could to weaken them.

If I were in the Texas National Guard I would go AWOL in protest. This ain't America.. Since the Posse Comi Ta-Ta's Act in the first CW. Guys, he is asking you to break your oath and sell your jesus to the devil in the process.

He is using a red states military against a blue state. this ain't right. It's facism 100%

**** you pos.

murdock » 03 Sep 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:37 pm

**** you pos.

I saw this morning you are actually engaging in discussion on other posts.  It's promising ***!

Perhaps one day you will see beyond the shyt on your face.

Best Day Sir Fecal Facial

(PS: I am reporting your disturbances with increasing frequency, please try to implement auto correct on your duck and get him flying left side up. Quack Quack. Write your boat, don't tip your boat over.. pun mispell intended....)
 
 

The larger Elephant in the Political Womb:

Is there any transparency in a State's National Guard Activities?
Yes, there is transparency in a state's National Guard activities, but it varies depending on who controls the forces and the nature of their mission. When on state duty, a state's public records laws—similar to the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)—typically apply, though they are not as encompassing as when the Guard is under federal control. Accountability is complicated by the National Guard's dual-hatted role as a state and federal force.
Factors affecting National Guard transparency
Federal versus state control
Federal activation: When the National Guard is federalized (e.g., deployed overseas or to a U.S. territory), it falls under the same rules and chain of command as the active-duty military.
FOIA: This means federal laws like the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) govern access to records.
State activation: When a governor deploys the Guard for domestic missions like disaster relief or civil unrest, the relevant state's public access laws apply.
Public records laws: These laws vary significantly between states and determine which records are available to the public.
Public access to information
Records requests: You can request records from the National Guard, but the process and the records available depend on the authority under which the Guard was operating.
Federal records: The National Guard Bureau (NGB) processes FOIA requests for records generated when the Guard was under federal control.
State records: For state-level records, you must submit a request to the specific state's National Guard using their state's public records process.
Privacy Act vs. FOIA: The public's right to information is balanced against service members' right to privacy. The military releases basic details like name, rank, and duty status to the public, but more detailed personal records require authorization from the service member or next-of-kin.
Social media: Many state National Guard units maintain a robust social media presence to keep the public and service families informed about their activities.
Challenges and accountability issues
Gaps in oversight: The hybrid nature of the National Guard—operating under both federal and state authority—can create "structural deficits of accountability," with reports suggesting inconsistencies and cover-ups in some states.
Differing standards: In some cases, state codes of military justice may not align with federal standards, leading to inconsistent handling of issues like sexual assault and harassment.
Domestic law enforcement concerns: Legal scholars and civil liberties advocates have raised concerns about the use of the Guard for domestic policing, particularly regarding accountability and transparency when engaging with civilian populations.
Recent court decisions have underscored limits on using federalized National Guard forces for civilian law enforcement, which in turn affects what information can be made transparent.
For example, in 2025, a federal judge ruled that President Trump's use of the National Guard for law enforcement purposes in Los Angeles was illegal under the Posse Comitatus Act.

JohnnyYou » 04 Sep 2025, 2:38 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 2:38 am

I saw this morning you are actually engaging in discussion on other posts.  It's promising ***!

Perhaps one day you will see beyond the shyt on your face.

Best Day Sir Fecal Facial

(PS: I am reporting your disturbances with increasing frequency, please try to implement auto correct on your duck and get him flying left side up. Quack Quack. Write your boat, don't tip your boat over.. pun mispell intended....)

Go **** yourself ***.

Why the n word?

JohnnyYou » 03 Sep 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:02 pm

I wish everyday Americans could see what this really looks like.

This is Civil War.  I back the Power of the States.  As Trump did in the process of doing everything he could to weaken them.

If I were in the Texas National Guard I would go AWOL in protest. This ain't America.. Since the Posse Comi Ta-Ta's Act in the first CW. Guys, he is asking you to break your oath and sell your jesus to the devil in the process.

He is using a red states military against a blue state. this ain't right. It's facism 100%

"Using" red states military AGAINST A BLUE STATE?!??
It's "fascism" to bring law and order to a city where the safety of the population is being ignored by the politicians in power?

There were 58 people shot in Chicago over the past weekend, and it's likely that all 58 were black.
So tell us, Johnny.  Who is the real racist party dealing with the huge volume of crime in that city?
Is it Trump for trying to stop the shooting of young blacks by increasing the number of police and military to protect the worst crime-ridden neighborhoods?
Or is it Governor Pritzker who is the racist for being content with the number of blacks who get shot every weekend in Chicago and doing nothing to stop it?

So how long have you hated ***, Johnny?
 

Zeets2 » 04 Sep 2025, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 11:54 am

So how long have you hated ***, Johnny?

Since I read this post. The N word is too nice for you though. Satanic is more like it.
 
Of course there is another word that begins wth S that fits you like a wife beater t shirt. The red hat completes the uniform.
 
 

JohnnyYou » 04 Sep 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 3:09 pm

Since I read this post. The N word is too nice for you though. Satanic is more like it.
 
Of course there is another word that begins wth S that fits you like a wife beater t shirt. The red hat completes the uniform.

I don't think anyone own's the word *** even tho some people act like they do

Vegas » 03 Sep 2025, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:03 pm

Any chance that you would have a link?

No, johnny you jig pulls everything out of his ***...

nefarious101 » 04 Sep 2025, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 5:54 pm

I don't think anyone own's the word *** even tho some people act like they do

You don't have to be a *** to have a black soul.  You are proof of that.

Try helping others win, you will be more victorious.

 
Face the truth about who the pedos really are.

JohnnyYou » 05 Sep 2025, 1:11 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:11 am

You don't have to be a *** to have a black soul.  You are proof of that.

Try helping others win, you will be more victorious.

Face the truth about who the pedos really are.

You sure are a sad little person......all your opinions are full of hatred...and you are so deluded you think your opinions are fact

Do you have a real purpose in life or is this about it?

nefarious101 » 04 Sep 2025, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 5:54 pm

I don't think anyone own's the word *** even tho some people act like they do

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL6dfQj0gFA 4 minute mark

JohnnyYou » 04 Sep 2025, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 3:09 pm

Since I read this post. The N word is too nice for you though. Satanic is more like it.
 
Of course there is another word that begins wth S that fits you like a wife beater t shirt. The red hat completes the uniform.

Oh, I'm sorry!
Did you NOT intend to support the continued shootings of blacks in Democrat-run cities like Chicago, LA, DC, NY, Detroit, and Baltimore?
Because that's sure as **** what you sound like by demanding that Trump NOT send additional help to stop those crimes which ALL primarily are waged against blacks and other minorities!

So why can't you state quite plainly that you SUPPORT the shooting and killing of *** as I asked?  You see, I'M the one who is OPPOSED to that, and CHEER the fact that that the president (who you all STILL call a racist) is actually doing something to STOP those crimes that disproportionately affect blacks!

And from your statements, it's clear that you DON'T want it stopped (as it's already been stopped in DC), so my question is quite relevant.
Is it that you don't CARE how many blacks suffer from being crime victims, or do you just hate THEM enough to enjoy seeing dozens of *** get shot every weekend?


 

Zeets2 » 06 Sep 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 12:14 pm

Oh, I'm sorry!
Did you NOT intend to support the continued shootings of blacks in Democrat-run cities like Chicago, LA, DC, NY, Detroit, and Baltimore?
Because that's sure as **** what you sound like by demanding that Trump NOT send additional help to stop those crimes which ALL primarily are waged against blacks and other minorities!

So why can't you state quite plainly that you SUPPORT the shooting and killing of *** as I asked?  You see, I'M the one who is OPPOSED to that, and CHEER the fact that that the president (who you all STILL call a racist) is actually doing something to STOP those crimes that disproportionately affect blacks!

And from your statements, it's clear that you DON'T want it stopped (as it's already been stopped in DC), so my question is quite relevant.
Is it that you don't CARE how many blacks suffer from being crime victims, or do you just hate THEM enough to enjoy seeing dozens of *** get shot every weekend?

He wants them to have something to do