Liberal Forum

So not one MAGAt wants to hear Grifty, under oath...

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:39 pm

So not one MAGAt wants to hear Grifty, under oath...

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense. 
 

Whom will they call as witnesses?

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:40 pm

Whom will they call as witnesses?

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense. 
 

Vegas » 05 Sep 2025, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:40 pm

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

@Deezer Shoove  

Are you gonna let that clown flaunt his privileged status?

People are gonna start asking who is blowing whom.

Vegas » 05 Sep 2025, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:41 pm

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

@Deezer Shoove  

He's showing you zero respect...

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:42 pm

Are you gonna let that clown flaunt his privileged status?

People are gonna start asking who is blowing whom.

I don't know if you noticed, but it doesn't appear that Deezer gives a **** about your tears and tantrums.

Vegas » 05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm

I don't know if you noticed, but it doesn't appear that Deezer gives a **** about your tears and tantrums.

You should see my pm box.

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm

He's showing you zero respect...

I think Deezer is great. If I didn't respect him, then I would show it by incessantly tagging him...oh wait.

Well this is awkward.

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm

You should see my pm box.

No thanks. 
 
 

Vegas » 05 Sep 2025, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:44 pm

I think Deezer is great. If I didn't respect him, then I would show it by incessantly tagging him...oh wait.

Well this is awkward.

No...by persisting in spamming


Unless, of course, that lying coward never told you to desist.

Did you, @Deezer Shoove  ?
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 2:14 pm

No..

Yes...
 
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 2:14 pm

No...by persisting in spamming

Unless, of course, that lying coward never told you to desist.

Did you, @Deezer Shoove  ?

I told him to desist in spamming.
More than once. Will you take back calling me a liar now?

DeezerShoove » 05 Sep 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 3:51 pm

I told him to desist in spamming.
More than once. Will you take back calling me a liar now?

Spam Good. Moran Bad..

Zach Brown Band..  Fry it Up!

DeezerShoove » 05 Sep 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 3:51 pm

I told him to desist in spamming.
More than once. Will you take back calling me a liar now?

@Blackvegetable  isn't smart enough to understand what constitutes spamming.

You will need to get the crayons out for him. ​​​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm

@Deezer Shoove  

He's showing you zero respect...

Not me. You.
He's not stalking me. You are.

Seriously think about it:
What's the difference from his same-answer responses as compared to your same-answer responses?

You both create a non-answer to each other. You don't like his and he doesn't like yours.
Somehow YOU decide I prefer one over the other. I don't give a **** about your silly games.

Try to keep me the **** out of it.
I ignore this crap. Seems like opening up that diaper and checking yet again.
Nope, didn't change. It's still just ****.

That copy/paste PAGES of the repetition isn't flooding your thread is it?
Let's not start that stupid stuff again.
But your "new method" of tagging me is going to get old as of yesterday.
Stop being a dink about it.

Vegas » 05 Sep 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 9:29 am

Thanks for that money. Much appreciated. 

@Blackvegetable  any thoughts about your Rico? 

Hell, I went looking for rico to verify, and I can't even FIND the sumbitch. But the last time he ran this ****, I found that *** and he was fine - all systems go. 
 

Cannonpointer » 04 Sep 2025, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 8:33 pm

Rico Suave's account is wide open. If you have forgotten your password, signify, and I will give it a temporary and pm you. 

In ANY case, you can certainly look at any poster's notifications and activities just by going to their profile. 

You're simply bluffing.

To blave: bluff or deceive.  
     - Billy Crystal as Miracle Max

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 1:43 pm

You should see my pm box.

           

DeezerShoove » 05 Sep 2025, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2025, 4:05 pm

Not me. You.
He's not stalking me. You are.

Seriously think about it:
What's the difference from his same-answer responses as compared to your same-answer responses?

You both create a non-answer to each other. You don't like his and he doesn't like yours.
Somehow YOU decide I prefer one over the other. I don't give a **** about your silly games.

Try to keep me the **** out of it.
I ignore this crap. Seems like opening up that diaper and checking yet again.
Nope, didn't change. It's still just ****.

That copy/paste PAGES of the repetition isn't flooding your thread is it?
Let's not start that stupid stuff again.
But your "new method" of tagging me is going to get old as of yesterday.
Stop being a dink about it.

I'm not stalking you...I'm just sharing that which you enthusiastically enable...

Seriously think about it:What's the difference from his same-answer responses as compared to your same-answer responses?

You didn't spend a second thinking about that.

Why should I?

I don't accept your retellings.

Somehow YOU decide I prefer one over the other. I don't give a **** about your silly games.

Of course you do, you cowardly witless lump of ****.

There is no **** "equivalence".

You don't do a damn thing about his spamming....until it hits your notifications. Then you threaten me....

How stupid is that?

Tryl to keep me the **** out of it.

DO YOUR **** JOB, EVEN IF HE IS YOUR FELLOW TRAVELER, BITCH!