Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ 22,000
Another downward revision.The two-month net revision is downward, again, but only by 21,000.
Manufacturing jobs fell by 12,000 and are now down by 78,000 over the year.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blo ... h0IjoxfQ== THE
WORST
POTUS
EVER!

You don't doubt that you're a moron, do you?nefarious101 » 05 Sep 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Well TDS Fake News Dickhead....
This is why you are a TDS Fake News Dickhead
Just wait until next month....numbers will really suck but not as well as you do according to the those using "Rest Stops" along your local Interstates.
Trump's using Biden's fake Employment numbers to get the Pedo=progressive infested FED to drop rates.
Next month Trump will dump the a whole lot more of Biden's Fake Employment numbers and force the Anti-American Pedo=Progressive Fed to lower rates
You can post more TDS Fake News and solidify your standing as NHB's TDS Fake News Dickhead at that time
It's a win win situation....lower rates for Americans and you get to hold on to your TDS Fake News Dickhead Title
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Duck,
I told you he would suck....and now he's sucking.
Johhny You is a nigga?
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ 22,000
Another downward revision.The two-month net revision is downward, again, but only by 21,000.
Manufacturing jobs fell by 12,000 and are now down by 78,000 over the year.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blo ... h0IjoxfQ== THE
WORST
POTUS
EVER!

Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ Revisions showed employment shrank in June — the first payrolls decline since 2020.
HE'S BAAAAAAACK.....working his magic.
As you know, Rico was banned because the syphilitic combucket concluded that ANY answer is good enough.Vegas » 05 Sep 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑ As you already know, the question was posted long after Rico...find someplace else to hide.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ As you know, Rico was banned because the syphilitic combucket concluded that ANY answer is good enough.
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ As you know, Rico was banned because the syphilitic combucket concluded that ANY answer is good enough.
It has everything to do with it.Vegas » 05 Sep 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑![]()
As you know, nobody cares , because it has nothing to do with taking the deal. The question was posted long after Rico.
But you already know that. Find another excuse. That one doesn't work.
It has nothing to do with it. As I stated, 100 times now, the question was long after Rico.Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ It has everything to do with it.
Not that consistency is to be expected of a syphilis ravaged freak.
How many government jobs did he not create?Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ 22,000
Another downward revision.The two-month net revision is downward, again, but only by 21,000.
Manufacturing jobs fell by 12,000 and are now down by 78,000 over the year.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blo ... h0IjoxfQ== THE
WORST
POTUS
EVER!
That you're too stupid to understand that the SC would have to contradict his judgment in that instance is irrelevantVegas » 05 Sep 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ It has nothing to do with it. As I stated, 100 times now, the question was long after Rico.
Now shut up and take the deal. At least make an effort to be a man.
You people are **** idiots.RebelGator » 05 Sep 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ How many government jobs did he not create?
That's the real benchmark of a successful President.
You people are **** idiots.RebelGator » 05 Sep 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ How many government jobs did he not create?
That's the real benchmark of a successful President.
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ That you're too stupid to understand that the SC would have to contradict his judgment in that instance is irrelevant
I'm not the idiot struggling with "net".
Only in the retelling