Liberal Forum

None of them seemed to know what politics is.. Epstien wannabees on welfare.. The only fruitcake involved was in their brains.  None of them were transexual. Only one of them was Latino! The rest anglo saxon trailer trailer trash.

As of August 2025, eight people have been arrested and charged in connection with the Bibb County, Alabama, sex trafficking ring. Many have pleaded not guilty, and a gag order has since been placed on the case.
Those charged are:
Andres Velazquez-Trejo: Confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security as a Sureños gang member, he is accused of being a primary organizer of the abuse. According to court documents, he allegedly sold sex abuse of the children to "various clientele".
William Chase McElroy: One of the first three arrested, he is accused of multiple counts of human trafficking, rape, sodomy, and kidnapping.
Rebecca Brewer: The mother of four of the ten victims, she faces charges including sexual torture, rape, sodomy, kidnapping, and human trafficking.
Ricky Terrell: He and Rebecca Brewer face additional charges of first-degree rape and sexual torture of a child younger than 12. He is also charged with human trafficking, sexual torture, and rape.
Sara Louise Terrell: Charged with rape, sodomy, human trafficking, and sexual torture.
Dalton Terrell: Charged with rape, sodomy, human trafficking, and kidnapping.
Timothy St. John: An associate of the others, he is charged with rape, sodomy, and human trafficking.
Olivia Shailee Elam: Charged with multiple counts of rape, sodomy, kidnapping, human trafficking, and sexual torture/abuse.
According to an investigator's testimony, Sara Terrell and Olivia Elam were named by a victim as having participated in the abuse. The investigation is ongoing, and authorities believe more suspects may be involved.
 
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Sep 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 9:23 am

You are phooking liar.  I am no child molester. 9 out of 10 accusers should be the accused.

AI OverviewA multi-year, multi-person child sex-trafficking ring operating from an underground bunker in Bibb County, Alabama, was uncovered in 2025
. The investigation began in February 2025, and by August 2025, eight suspects had been arrested and charged. 
Discovery and investigation

• Initial discovery: In February 2025, the Bibb County Sheriff's Office was alerted to concerns about the sexual abuse of children in an underground bunker in Brent, Alabama.
• Victims rescued: Authorities found two of the victims in the bunker performing sexual acts and subsequently rescued them. The children were reportedly drugged to make them more compliant and were threatened with shock collars.
• Arrests made: The initial arrests of seven suspects occurred in July 2025, with an eighth person arrested in August.
• Federal assistance: The Department of Homeland Security is assisting in the investigation, probing possible connections to national or international sex-trafficking rings, including potential ties to the Mexican gang Sureños. 

Crimes and conditions

• Victims: The ring victimized at least 10 children, ranging in age from 3 to 15, over a period of three years. Several of the victims were children of the suspects.
• Underground bunker: The crimes took place in a former storm shelter on a rural property. Photos released by authorities show the squalid concrete bunker where the abuse occurred.
• Torture and abuse: Victims were allegedly chained to furniture, drugged, and sold for sexual acts. Shock collars intended for animals were reportedly used to torture them.
• Profits: Investigators reported that the ring's organizers could make up to $1,000 per night from selling the children for sex. 

Suspects and charges
Among the eight individuals arrested were parents of the victims. Each suspect is alleged to have played a specific role in the trafficking operation. The charges against them include numerous felonies, such as: 

• Human trafficking
• Rape
• Sodomy
• Kidnapping
• Sexual torture
• Aggravated child abuse

Current status
The investigation is ongoing, and authorities believe there could be additional victims and perpetrators. Some of the defendants have pleaded not guilty, with preliminary hearings scheduled for later in 2025.

I didn't ask you to reach into your spank bank, millstone magnet. 
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Sep 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 9:23 am

You are phooking liar.  I am no child molester. 9 out of 10 accusers should be the accused.

AI OverviewA multi-year, multi-person child sex-trafficking ring operating from an underground bunker in Bibb County, Alabama, was uncovered in 2025
. The investigation began in February 2025, and by August 2025, eight suspects had been arrested and charged. 
Discovery and investigation

• Initial discovery: In February 2025, the Bibb County Sheriff's Office was alerted to concerns about the sexual abuse of children in an underground bunker in Brent, Alabama.
• Victims rescued: Authorities found two of the victims in the bunker performing sexual acts and subsequently rescued them. The children were reportedly drugged to make them more compliant and were threatened with shock collars.
• Arrests made: The initial arrests of seven suspects occurred in July 2025, with an eighth person arrested in August.
• Federal assistance: The Department of Homeland Security is assisting in the investigation, probing possible connections to national or international sex-trafficking rings, including potential ties to the Mexican gang Sureños. 

Crimes and conditions

• Victims: The ring victimized at least 10 children, ranging in age from 3 to 15, over a period of three years. Several of the victims were children of the suspects.
• Underground bunker: The crimes took place in a former storm shelter on a rural property. Photos released by authorities show the squalid concrete bunker where the abuse occurred.
• Torture and abuse: Victims were allegedly chained to furniture, drugged, and sold for sexual acts. Shock collars intended for animals were reportedly used to torture them.
• Profits: Investigators reported that the ring's organizers could make up to $1,000 per night from selling the children for sex. 

Suspects and charges
Among the eight individuals arrested were parents of the victims. Each suspect is alleged to have played a specific role in the trafficking operation. The charges against them include numerous felonies, such as: 

• Human trafficking
• Rape
• Sodomy
• Kidnapping
• Sexual torture
• Aggravated child abuse

Current status
The investigation is ongoing, and authorities believe there could be additional victims and perpetrators. Some of the defendants have pleaded not guilty, with preliminary hearings scheduled for later in 2025.

LOL.  That "bunker" was a storm shelter for the 7 arrestees who lived in a trailer park.  The Bibb Co. Sheriff and the feds self-importantly tried to make a half dozen family losers look like an international ring.  

But keep trying to deflect from your support of library *** story hour and screwing up kids going thru puberty.  

JohnnyYou » 06 Sep 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 9:25 am

None of them seemed to know what politics is.. Epstien wannabees on welfare.. The only fruitcake involved was in their brains.  None of them were transexual. Only one of them was Latino! The rest anglo saxon trailer trailer trash.

As of August 2025, eight people have been arrested and charged in connection with the Bibb County, Alabama, sex trafficking ring. Many have pleaded not guilty, and a gag order has since been placed on the case.
Those charged are:
Andres Velazquez-Trejo: Confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security as a Sureños gang member, he is accused of being a primary organizer of the abuse. According to court documents, he allegedly sold sex abuse of the children to "various clientele".
William Chase McElroy: One of the first three arrested, he is accused of multiple counts of human trafficking, rape, sodomy, and kidnapping.
Rebecca Brewer: The mother of four of the ten victims, she faces charges including sexual torture, rape, sodomy, kidnapping, and human trafficking.
Ricky Terrell: He and Rebecca Brewer face additional charges of first-degree rape and sexual torture of a child younger than 12. He is also charged with human trafficking, sexual torture, and rape.
Sara Louise Terrell: Charged with rape, sodomy, human trafficking, and sexual torture.
Dalton Terrell: Charged with rape, sodomy, human trafficking, and kidnapping.
Timothy St. John: An associate of the others, he is charged with rape, sodomy, and human trafficking.
Olivia Shailee Elam: Charged with multiple counts of rape, sodomy, kidnapping, human trafficking, and sexual torture/abuse.
According to an investigator's testimony, Sara Terrell and Olivia Elam were named by a victim as having participated in the abuse. The investigation is ongoing, and authorities believe more suspects may be involved.

But wht is your stance on the topic?  Afraid to say?  Haven’t been told what to think yet?

*Huey » 06 Sep 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 8:07 am

It seems those who support trans rights are between  a rock and a hard place. Gun rights groups are against the gun ban on Trans.  I am not to sure about it either.  

But now guys like @Blackvegetable  have to decide do they support trans rights or not.

Even the NRA is against Trump team plan to ban trans people from owning firearms Second Amendment groups fire back at Justice Department over potential proposals to block trans people from possessing guns

News of a potential plan from Donald Trump’s administration to block transgender Americans from owning firearms was met with an avalanche of opposition — including from major Second Amendment groups historically aligned with Republicans.

 The National Rifle Association, among the nation’s largest and most influential lobbying groups, said “the Second Amendment isn’t up for debate.”

 “The NRA supports the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans to purchase, possess and use firearms,” the group said in a statement Friday.

“NRA does not, and will not, support any policy proposals that implement sweeping gun bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process,” the group said.

 Gun Owners of America, another major gun rights lobbying group, said it “opposes any and all gun bans. Full stop.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 21095.html

Funny how Trump continues to checkmate you morons.

The left will address this as soon as they define a woman.      
 

A man who wants to act like a women or a women who wants to act like a man is just a freak job. They are mentally ill. Lock them up. I'm not talking about a little girl who is a tomboy and grows out of it. The Democrat party is the freak job party. Why is it that every freak job is a Democrat?

RebelGator » 06 Sep 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 8:10 am

I don't believe mentally ill people should possess guns......trannies are mentally ill, so it's an easy stance for me.

Agree....
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Sep 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 8:55 am

And 6000 vets commit suicide a year. Nobody cares..

it is unfortunate 17 children die from school shootings a year.  Usually by white folks..

And kid groomers pimping kid sex slaves in the basement?  You really should revisit who the perpetrators  really are..

Links?

MisterIggy » 06 Sep 2025, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 9:04 am

No such thing as "trans." Man up, homos.

 

ROG62 » 06 Sep 2025, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 3:00 pm

Links?

Best I can do being digitally handicapped. This is about 37 sites and 400 articles.

Are children wthout parents being deported from the United States
Yes, the United States is actively deporting some children who entered the country without a parent or legal guardian
. This has been a significant shift in immigration policy and has drawn major criticism from child welfare and legal advocates. 
Here are the key details regarding the deportation of unaccompanied migrant children:

• Deportation directives. In early 2025, the Trump administration reportedly issued a directive to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to increase enforcement actions against unaccompanied migrant children. The plan, codenamed "Unaccompanied Alien Children Joint Initiative Field Implementation," aimed to meet higher deportation targets.
• High-priority targets. The enforcement plan reportedly prioritizes children based on categories such as "flight risks" (for missing court dates), "public safety," or "border security".
• Court intervention. A federal judge has issued temporary restraining orders to block the deportation flights of hundreds of unaccompanied children, primarily from Guatemala, after advocacy groups filed emergency injunctions. The judge criticized the government for attempting to deport children in the middle of the night without ensuring they had access to their full legal rights.
• Suspension of legal aid. In a related action, the administration briefly suspended legal aid services for unaccompanied minors. Although this decision was quickly reversed after public backlash, it highlighted the administration's aggressive enforcement stance.
• Data access concerns. Concerns have also been raised over ICE's access to a database maintained by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) that contains the sensitive personal information of unaccompanied children. Child welfare advocates fear this data could be used to facilitate deportations.
• Existing legal protections. Historically, unaccompanied children are provided certain protections under U.S. and international law, including the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) and the Flores Settlement Agreement. These protections are meant to ensure the child's safety and well-being and require the government to place them in the "least restrictive setting," typically with a vetted sponsor, while their immigration case proceeds. The recent deportation push represents a significant change in enforcement priorities that is at odds with these protections. 

Legal experts and advocates have voiced serious humanitarian concerns about the impact of these policies on vulnerable children, including increasing their risk of trauma, exploitation, and family separation. 

And they lie on the square feet! Freaky..

The 10 year old girl was a blurb on MSNBC on video..

You have to mine your own data business.
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Sep 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 8:55 am

And 6000 vets commit suicide a year. Nobody cares..

it is unfortunate 17 children die from school shootings a year.  Usually by white folks..

And kid groomers pimping kid sex slaves in the basement?  You really should revisit who the perpetrators  really are..

**** you come get my guns ya *** cocksucker.
 

JohnnyYou » 06 Sep 2025, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 3:12 pm

Best I can do being digitally handicapped. This is about 37 sites and 400 articles.

Are children wthout parents being deported from the United States
Yes, the United States is actively deporting some children who entered the country without a parent or legal guardian
. This has been a significant shift in immigration policy and has drawn major criticism from child welfare and legal advocates. 
Here are the key details regarding the deportation of unaccompanied migrant children:

• Deportation directives. In early 2025, the Trump administration reportedly issued a directive to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to increase enforcement actions against unaccompanied migrant children. The plan, codenamed "Unaccompanied Alien Children Joint Initiative Field Implementation," aimed to meet higher deportation targets.
• High-priority targets. The enforcement plan reportedly prioritizes children based on categories such as "flight risks" (for missing court dates), "public safety," or "border security".
• Court intervention. A federal judge has issued temporary restraining orders to block the deportation flights of hundreds of unaccompanied children, primarily from Guatemala, after advocacy groups filed emergency injunctions. The judge criticized the government for attempting to deport children in the middle of the night without ensuring they had access to their full legal rights.
• Suspension of legal aid. In a related action, the administration briefly suspended legal aid services for unaccompanied minors. Although this decision was quickly reversed after public backlash, it highlighted the administration's aggressive enforcement stance.
• Data access concerns. Concerns have also been raised over ICE's access to a database maintained by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) that contains the sensitive personal information of unaccompanied children. Child welfare advocates fear this data could be used to facilitate deportations.
• Existing legal protections. Historically, unaccompanied children are provided certain protections under U.S. and international law, including the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) and the Flores Settlement Agreement. These protections are meant to ensure the child's safety and well-being and require the government to place them in the "least restrictive setting," typically with a vetted sponsor, while their immigration case proceeds. The recent deportation push represents a significant change in enforcement priorities that is at odds with these protections. 

Legal experts and advocates have voiced serious humanitarian concerns about the impact of these policies on vulnerable children, including increasing their risk of trauma, exploitation, and family separation.

How does this,  ^^^ ,  apply to;

JohnnyYou »  Today, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 8:55 am
And 6000 vets commit suicide a year. Nobody cares..

it is unfortunate 17 children die from school shootings a year.  Usually by white folks..

And kid groomers pimping kid sex slaves in the basement?  You really should revisit who the perpetrators  really are..

 

 caitlyn jenners gonna be mad

wonder if he will say so on FOX news 

I have my doubts   

ROG62 » 06 Sep 2025, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 2:59 pm

Agree....

That's a slippery slope just waiting for gun banners to take off with it...
 

*Huey » 06 Sep 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 8:07 am

It seems those who support trans rights are between  a rock and a hard place. Gun rights groups are against the gun ban on Trans.  I am not to sure about it either.  

But now guys like @Blackvegetable  have to decide do they support trans rights or not.

Even the NRA is against Trump team plan to ban trans people from owning firearms Second Amendment groups fire back at Justice Department over potential proposals to block trans people from possessing guns

News of a potential plan from Donald Trump’s administration to block transgender Americans from owning firearms was met with an avalanche of opposition — including from major Second Amendment groups historically aligned with Republicans.

 The National Rifle Association, among the nation’s largest and most influential lobbying groups, said “the Second Amendment isn’t up for debate.”

 “The NRA supports the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans to purchase, possess and use firearms,” the group said in a statement Friday.

“NRA does not, and will not, support any policy proposals that implement sweeping gun bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process,” the group said.

 Gun Owners of America, another major gun rights lobbying group, said it “opposes any and all gun bans. Full stop.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 21095.html

Funny how Trump continues to checkmate you morons.

Trans are mentally ill and their record of per capita violence and self destruction speaks for itself.

Own guns?....no....Institutionalized?....yes!!

Need to get the mentally ill and the criminals off the street....warehousing them would be far cheaper and safe that what we are doing now.

murdock » 06 Sep 2025, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 3:42 pm

**** you come get my guns ya *** cocksucker.

Are you a Veteran?

Mrkelly » 06 Sep 2025, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2025, 3:54 pm

 caitlyn jenners gonna be mad

wonder if he will say so on FOX news 

I have my doubts 

you are such a one trick pony.  It seems you bring up Jenner for every trans issue.  And you are afraid to take a stand on the Op like the rest of the lefties.
 

JohnnyYou » 07 Sep 2025, 1:30 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2025, 1:30 am

Are you a Veteran?

None ya biz. SMDWYMA.

*Huey » 07 Sep 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2025, 9:57 am

you are such a one trick pony.  It seems you bring up Jenner for every trans issue.  And you are afraid to take a stand on the Op like the rest of the lefties.

Mr queerly wants to suck Jenner's dick!