not true.*Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The ONLY ones who got SCREWED here was YOUR SIDE because opposing Trump at all costs is ALL you have!!
Fact is, the MORE people learn about that BBB, the better they like it and they are finding out how much you ASSHOLES lied about what was in it in the first place!! That is called a WIN-WIN!!
So go suck yourself off and STFU!!
When did he order it?
-----------------------------AP estimates show Trump won 57.7% of Starr County in South Texas, along the border.He is the first Republican presidential candidate to win the heavily-Hispanic county since 1892.Trump lost Starr County to Hillary Clinton by 60 points in 2016.
Thanks for not using God's name in vain, like you do.
jerrab » 10 Sep 2025, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ not true.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/20 ... ing-slips/
Public assessments of Trump on several personal traits are also more negative than they were in 2024. Fewer now say he cares about the needs of ordinary people (37% today, 42% last summer), is a good role model (29% now, 34% then) or is mentally sharp (48% now, 53% then).
********************************Trump’s Tariffs and ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ Face More Opposition Than Support as His Job Rating Slips
and so is bearing false witness against your neighbor--- lying--
not only republicans voted for trump*Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Pew research?? You're kidding us, right??
Seeing how this LEFT WING POS RAG is doing all it can to "win" something and the fact is, they POLL MORE DHIMS to get these "results".
Bottom line is, YOU LEFT WING ASSWIPERS are getting MUTILATED in VOTER REGISTRATIONS1! Dhims are LOSING, REPUBLICANS CAINING!!
Now, that REALLY sucks for you and your ilk assholes!!
Voter registration shift (2020–2024)
According to a New York Times analysis, which reviewed data from the 30 states and Washington, D.C. that register voters by party, the shift has been substantial:
- Democrats lost approximately 2.1 million registered voters.
- Republicans gained about 2.4 million registered voters.
- This resulted in a net gain of 4.5 million voters for the Republican Party over the Democrats in these states.
READ it REAL SLOW.....jerrab » 10 Sep 2025, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑ and so is bearing false witness against your neighbor--- lying--
---------------------------------------------------------
your post----------------
No Evidence of Improper Presidential InvolvementHolder suggests that President Trump directly called Texas officials to demand five congressional seats. However:2. Redistricting Is a State-Led Process
- There is no publicly verified transcript or recording of such a call, unlike the Raffensperger call which was documented.
- The claim appears to be based on political inference, not hard evidence. Without proof, it remains speculative and rhetorical.
3. Democrats Have Engaged in Aggressive Redistricting Too
- Redistricting is constitutionally delegated to state legislatures, not the federal executive branch.
- Governors like Greg Abbott have the authority to call special sessions, and legislatures can redraw maps mid-decade if they choose. This is not illegal or unprecedented.
4. Holder’s Framing Is Politically Motivated
- States like New York and Illinois, under Democratic control, have redrawn maps to favor their party. In New York, the post-2022 redistricting endangered multiple Republican seats.
- California’s governor even proposed retaliatory redistricting in response to Texas’s actions—which undermines Holder’s claim that Democrats are merely “responsive” and “temporary.”
----------------------------------------------
- Holder chairs the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, whose mission is to counter Republican map-drawing. His statements are part of a broader political strategy, not neutral legal analysis.
- His comparison to the Georgia call is emotionally charged but lacks factual parity. The Georgia call involved vote counting, not legislative redist
you were lying about me when I said trump ordered gerrymandering and you said I was wrong.
jerrab » 10 Sep 2025, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑ not only republicans voted for trump
-------------------------
AP estimates show Trump won 57.7% of Starr County in South Texas, along the border.He is the first Republican presidential candidate to win the heavily-Hispanic county since 1892.Trump lost Starr County to Hillary Clinton by 60 points in 2016.
*Beekeeper » 10 Sep 2025, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑ They are LEAVING YOUR DHIMOCRAP PARTY, MORON!!
How hard is that for you to comprehend??
Never mind, you're a **** idiot.
MR-7 » 10 Sep 2025, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ READ it REAL SLOW.....
viewtopic.php?p=2794132#p2794132
See the first 3 words....Thank You CoPilot
CoPilot is an AI, jerrab. I gave CoPilot the credit it deserves in the very first sentence. U really R a stupid little ****.
False witness.....I'm Agnostic jerrab...![]()
But, even though I am Agnostic, I have the common deicency/respect to not take the Devine one's name, (whether it be God, Allah, Brahma, YHWH, Buddha, Waheguru, ect...), and commit Blasphemy. It is considered a serious sin, especially when directed at the Holy Spirit (sometimes called the “unforgivable sin” in Matthew 12:31–32)
You have really **** up you little ****-Upper. Looks like MOJO for the MoFo. Good LUCK.
sorry I don't take religious advice from Christ haters.MR-7 » 10 Sep 2025, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑ READ it REAL SLOW.....
viewtopic.php?p=2794132#p2794132
See the first 3 words....Thank You CoPilot
CoPilot is an AI, jerrab. I gave CoPilot the credit it deserves in the very first sentence. U really R a stupid little ****.
False witness.....I'm Agnostic jerrab...![]()
But, even though I am Agnostic, I have the common deicency/respect to not take the Devine one's name, (whether it be God, Allah, Brahma, YHWH, Buddha, Waheguru, ect...), and commit Blasphemy. It is considered a serious sin, especially when directed at the Holy Spirit (sometimes called the “unforgivable sin” in Matthew 12:31–32)
You have really **** up you little ****-Upper. Looks like MOJO for the MoFo. Good LUCK.
When you educated yourself and understand what Agnostic means, get back to me.
MR-7 » 10 Sep 2025, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ When you educated yourself and understand what Agnostic means, get back to me.
-----------------------------------------------------------------MR-7 » 10 Sep 2025, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ When you educated yourself and understand what Agnostic means, get back to me.
Wheres Eddie Haskell and Lumpy Rutherford when ya need em most..
I always suspected you were a staunch conservative.