Liberal Forum

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

Knew you couldn’t do it.  You are still running from defining an assault weapon and the answer your demanded.  

Yup, you are still a ******.  

My bad, another call out thread where the ****** uses PG.

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

    poor Veghead. 

He still can't figure out why it is abnormal to spend hours and hours in member's profiles. 

    Veghead deletes my post. 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

You should have banned me...oh wait.     
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm

Making a point here.

Chill.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

 

TwoIfByTea » 12 Sep 2025, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:26 pm

Hello here we go again..

Look why dont ya just meet up break some bread share a meal sit at table have afew drinks too..

I know seems crazy right that said I bet if ya both talk it out find ya got more in common than ya realize.

Okay Mom ya always go 2 college said I was smart youmg man try encourage me

Nonetheless ya guys just go all across this board telling eachother off and "Off Topic" pollution throw turds across entire board..

Eh wheres Old Chuck or that other place with Trinnity..

See I can be a "Moderator" too if I really wanted 2 be.

I tried that 3 years yers ago when I was in Boston and was about 30 miles away.  After years of threats he hid and did not.come out

JohnnyYou » 12 Sep 2025, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 3:29 pm

5 greenies for the Mormon  in ya..

Not a mormon but thanks.  This will be PG'd shortly.

JohnnyYou » 12 Sep 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 3:43 pm

Tyler is raised in a Republican  Mormon    household. 

A Mormon killed Charlie.. Almost poetic..

Before I jump to conclusion I will wait for more info to come out.  But hey, you jump on the initial stories all you want.  

You come across as a older person but you jump on stories like a young one.

JohnnyYou » 12 Sep 2025, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 3:29 pm

Does anyone know that the shooter was Mormon raised? In..  wait for it.. Utah.

Republican  family. Dads a preacher and a sherrif..

Obviously that means squat.....under the circumstances.

Cedar » 12 Sep 2025, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 4:34 pm

Peanut gallery is for cowards.

Damn right another place that Trinnity lady and a Trucking Forum put up that Ignore Block..

I said what would these kinda places be if everybody just blocks everybody out on ingnore.

They did not exactly like that and posted on "Public Board" why not "PM" dont throw ya Garbage out on the board..

This is "No Holds Barred".

That said Im sick of the gay sex stuff and blowimg off goats that junk.

put up a freaking "Debate" and lets throw it all out there Back & Forth..

Dont have to Agree neccessairrily or see eye 2 eye okay..

But altleast have something better than name calling or ya a Jew Nword or a Queer okay..

Throw up or just "STFU"

Huey » 12 Sep 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:40 pm

5 greenies for a tribute thread!

Evidently you scored a direct hit to trigger the TDS Fake New Dickhead know as BV to create such a tribute thread

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

...I read the thread title and thought is was an autobigraphy about you Stumpy.


Sorry.   

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

WOW!! Did you realize you were HATED THAT MUCH??

Trust us, it's not "love" of anything you say or do!! Mr. Dumplex!!

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:01 pm

 
267 notifications since Aug 17th.

Not including secondary notifications because he tagged me, repeatedly, in threads and  exchanges in which I played no part.

Even took off his @* tunic so he could violate his own rule, again.

^^^^ https://i.postimg.cc/zXXJd35V/cry-baby.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm

Making a point here.

Chill.

first time for everything...

*Beekeeper » 13 Sep 2025, 5:26 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2025, 5:26 am

^^^^ https://i.postimg.cc/zXXJd35V/cry-baby.gif

Blackvegetable » 16 Sep 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 10:21 am

 

BV is a ******, he will run like the coward he is