Liberal Forum

ConservativeWave » 16 Sep 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 7:53 am

Well, is "Freedom of Speech", REALLY "Freedom of Speech", if SOME people takes it upon THEMSELVES to DEFINE and DICTATE what can be Spoken, or Printed, and what CAN NOT ? 

I think within SPECIFIC boundaries (i.e. speech that INCITES Violence, Destruction, or Harm to individuals)... People should ABSOLUTELY have that RIGHT to speak FREELY!  ...and, when people start equating actual "Freedom of Speech".. (which is what Charlie Kirk was ALL ABOUT)... with ONLY allowing "Freedom of Speech" that THEY agree with, and in SQUELCHING "Freedom of Speech" that they don't agree with?...

THAT ACT is a TOTAL violation of the "RIGHT"... and people SHOULD be FIRED or REMOVED from positions that they use to CONTROL what CAN be spoken, and what CAN NOT, from a PURELY POLITICAL standpoint, and IN UTTER violation of our Constitutional RIGHTS !

We do have the right say whatever we want and someone else can knock us on our *** for saying it.
 

murdock » 16 Sep 2025, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 3:55 pm

We do have the right say whatever we want and someone else can knock us on our *** for saying it.

MAYBE, but if that happens (or they try) and if I don't decide to KNOCK THEM on THEIR ***, as a result... It STILL falls under the heading of Freedom of Speech, AND, I can decide to NOT knock them down, I can STILL SUE the **** out of that person !