Liberal Forum

Vegas » 15 Sep 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 2:20 pm

why you think Kirk was a racist or spread hate speech. 

Give us specific examples. No CNN/Bloomberg/Left media ****. Give us specific examples of what he preached that made you think he was spewing hate. Real examples. Not just what you heard. Give evidence. 

 


The prediction for their response is easy: Not one **** example will be given. Not one. Not a single one. 

Can I play in this misdirection.

Anyone dying to stay in intellectual freedom from self evident time displaced evolving equally alive now hates the idea genetics actually leaves ancestors living eternally separated in series parallel time now.

I made peace with my physical absolute one time alive situation specifically alive as eternally separated now. Evolving is a natural process living in a perpetual balancing universe never same details twice with results always changing form since arrived their specific time alive now.

Greed of trying to become a chosen people to inherit the earth every generation forward per hearts beating currently here. Each heart's brain only exists navigating time lived since conceived.

why won't people choose honesty over hope faith, charity promising 7 artificial tomorrows daily here?

Blackvegetable » 16 Sep 2025, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 6:06 am

Here's yours...

You're overdue.

you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.