A couple interesting FACTS associated with your post and link:Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2025, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ https://youtu.be/xrK7smc4XIY?si=-0178kZcnyy4cCVb
Who called Pirro a reckless drunken maniac?
Her employer and colleagues...
Imagine being so **** stupid that you RECORD that ****...
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DN5c-eZgP6b/ConservativeWave » 18 Sep 2025, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ A couple interesting FACTS associated with your post and link:
1) The word DRUNK was NEVER Part of the official Testimony !
2) Sheldon Whitehouse is a Reckless and Maniac LIBERAL Democrat IDIOT from Rhode Island !
3) Reckless and Maniac are COMMON words that Reckless and Maniac Liberal IDIOTS use to describe Conservatives who they DESPISE !
4) Judge Pirro is a PROUD Conservative, WHO doesn't give a CRAP what Reckless and Maniac "Liberals" think of her !
5) NEITHER should intelligent Conservatives GIVE A CRAP what Reckless and Maniac Liberals THINK !!
Imagine being so **** stupid that you POST that ****...?
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ https://youtu.be/xrK7smc4XIY?si=-0178kZcnyy4cCVb
Who called Pirro a reckless drunken maniac?
Her employer and colleagues...
Imagine being so **** stupid that you RECORD that ****...
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
THAT **** LIE was easy to DEBUNK, ASSWIPER!!
Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ Even so, according to Smartmatic's filing, prime-time executive Cooper warned Scott: "Pirro has a tendency to find random conspiracy theories on weird internet sites."
The filing says she assigned a manager and a consultant to work with Pirro to keep her "from saying untrue things... etc."
Pirro hosted her weekly show the next day and again the next week. Executives flagged her scripts, which were frequently contradicted by research from Fox's "Brainroom," to one another, according to Smartmatic's filing.
"It's rife w[ith] conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television," Fox News executive Jerry Andrews wrote to two other executives on Nov. 20, Smartmatic's filing says.
Ibid.
No problem....that's why we have The Five...
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Even so, according to Smartmatic's filing, prime-time executive Cooper warned Scott: "Pirro has a tendency to find random conspiracy theories on weird internet sites."
The filing says she assigned a manager and a consultant to work with Pirro to keep her "from saying untrue things... etc."
Pirro hosted her weekly show the next day and again the next week. Executives flagged her scripts, which were frequently contradicted by research from Fox's "Brainroom," to one another, according to Smartmatic's filing.
"It's rife w[ith] conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television," Fox News executive Jerry Andrews wrote to two other executives on Nov. 20, Smartmatic's filing says.
Ibid.
No problem....that's why we have The Five...
What doesn't fit?*Beekeeper » 18 Sep 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Where is the part where you call her a Fascist, Nazi, and Hitler's handmaiden??
Did she tutors you down for a date?Blackvegetable » Today, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ https://youtu.be/xrK7smc4XIY?si=-0178kZcnyy4cCVb
Who called Pirro a reckless drunken maniac?
Her employer and colleagues...
Imagine being so **** stupid that you RECORD that ****...
ONLY ALL of it !
Two thoughts in your head?
Blackvegetable » 18 Sep 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Even so, according to Smartmatic's filing, prime-time executive Cooper warned Scott: "Pirro has a tendency to find random conspiracy theories on weird internet sites."
The filing says she assigned a manager and a consultant to work with Pirro to keep her "from saying untrue things... etc."
Pirro hosted her weekly show the next day and again the next week. Executives flagged her scripts, which were frequently contradicted by research from Fox's "Brainroom," to one another, according to Smartmatic's filing.
"It's rife w[ith] conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television," Fox News executive Jerry Andrews wrote to two other executives on Nov. 20, Smartmatic's filing says.
Ibid.
No problem....that's why we have The Five...