Liberal Forum

RebelGator » 20 Sep 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Sep 2025, 12:26 pm

$150 million?

Something isn't jibing.....Jews are a supposed to be stingy with their money.....I read it here, right on this site.

Well...technically, it was 150 million American taxpayer dollars. That's where all their money comes from. 
 

Mrkelly » 21 Sep 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 9:23 am

I look for Tucker to be bumped

Probably, but if they suicide too many at once, then that will incite the mass to no return. They will need to space it out. Let the media storm die out, deflect to some other big story somewhere...then bump him. 

Repeat.
 

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 1:37 pm

1.  I didn't spread lies.  It is a fact that Macron is suing in the US Courts because Owens is claiming Brigette is a biological male.

2.  It is a fact that she will be disposed if need be due to the lawsuit in France.

3.  I don't Macron's.  My comments are in pointing out that Owens has jumped on the conspiracy bandwagon.

Yeah yeah whatever whatever. You cosigned MSM talking points. 

That's the speed YOU choose. I don't choose that FOR you. 
 

Cannonpointer » 21 Sep 2025, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:37 pm

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 1:37 pm

1.  I didn't spread lies.  It is a fact that Macron is suing in the US Courts because Owens is claiming Brigette is a biological male.

2.  It is a fact that she will be disposed if need be due to the lawsuit in France.

3.  I don't Macron's.  My comments are in pointing out that Owens has jumped on the conspiracy bandwagon.

Yeah yeah whatever whatever. You cosigned MSM talking points. 

That's the speed YOU choose. I don't choose that FOR you.

Just to be clear your stance is that the following BBC citation is fall:

The allegation originated in fringe online spaces years earlier, notably through a 2021 YouTube video by French bloggers Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey.

 The Macrons initially won a defamation case in France against Roy and Rey in 2024, but that ruling was overturned on appeal in 2025 on freedom of expression grounds, not on the basis of truth. The Macrons are appealing the decision.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg3llj5nxdo
 

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:43 pm

Just to be clear your stance is that the following BBC citation is fall:

The allegation originated in fringe online spaces years earlier, notably through a 2021 YouTube video by French bloggers Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey.

OMG I could NEVER have googled this tripe for myself. THANK YOU so much!

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:43 pm

 The Macrons initially won a defamation case in France against Roy and Rey in 2024, but that ruling was overturned on appeal in 2025 on freedom of expression grounds, not on the basis of truth. The Macrons are appealing the decision.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg3llj5nxdo

The "win" was based on the reporter mis-identifying a photo - NOT ON THE CLAIM THAT JEAN CLAUDE TROGNEUX ("BRIGITTE") IS A MAN, fool. 

The MSM glosses over that fact - and shallow drinkers are stuck regurgitating the scum off the top.
 
 

It's not odd that the Epstein files were blocked by the senate on the same day Kirk was shot? 

Cannonpointer » 21 Sep 2025, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:46 pm

OMG I could NEVER have googled this tripe for myself. THANK YOU so much!

The "win" was based on the reporter mis-identifying a photo - NOT ON THE CLAIM THAT JEAN CLAUDE TROGNEUX ("BRIGITTE") IS A MAN, fool. 

The MSM glosses over that fact - and shallow drinkers are stuck regurgitating the scum off the top.

Shrug

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:47 pm

Shrug

Exactly. Shrug. Doesn't mean anything - yet you spread that manure with zero discrimination. WHICH BRINGS US TO THE CENTRAL QUESTION:

When will you stop trusting the headlines and start digging deeper before you opine?
 
 

Cannonpointer » 21 Sep 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:49 pm

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:47 pm

Shrug

Exactly. Shrug. Doesn't mean anything - yet you spread that manure with zero discrimination. WHICH BRINGS US TO THE CENTRAL QUESTION:

When will you stop trusting the headlines and start digging deeper before you opine?
 
 

 

I did dig deeper. My original posting is backed up by the BBC.  

Vegas » 21 Sep 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:03 pm

Probably, but if they suicide too many at once, then that will incite the mass to no return. They will need to space it out. Let the media storm die out, deflect to some other big story somewhere...then bump him. 

Repeat.

I meant bumped from the service 

not bumped off
 

Mrkelly » 21 Sep 2025, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:57 pm

I meant bumped from the service 

not bumped off

Oh...whoops. My bad. 

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:54 pm

I did dig deeper. My original posting is backed up by the BBC.

Is this the same BBC whose reporter stood in front of Tower 7 reading from a prepared script about it having collapsed, 20 minutes before it collapsed?

Is BBC NOT part of the MSM? Is BBC calling **** on the muslim takeover of england or the tranny narrative?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3e5KFyadUw

Huey » 21 Sep 2025, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 1:37 pm

1.  I didn't spread lies.  It is a fact that Macron is suing in the US Courts because Owens is claiming Brigette is a biological male.

2.  It is a fact that she will be disposed if need be due to the lawsuit in France.

3.  I don't Macron's.  My comments are in pointing out that Owens has jumped on the conspiracy bandwagon.

When everyone conspires to sustain the 7 days a week time line logistics scenario instead of understanding now is eternity with genetic results living specifically equally eternally separate ancestors alive daily here so a mental state of mind takes precedence socially obeying contextual values over chromosomes never duplicated twice in any ancestral lineage of the food chain native to this atmosphere in series parallel displacement recording history of how people perform cradle to grave is why evil is just live social behavior in current events.

Yesterday, today, tomorrow each rotation of the planet each reproduction native to this atmosphere evolves as one of a kind since conception until dead at the same time per rotation of the planet.

Series parallel results never same total sum details accomplished twice and compounding situation of spontaneously alive simultaneously here since conception until decomposed corpse reverted back to periodic elements/inorganic universal location. Remember several decades ago the conversations about cold fusion. Evolving is that cold fusion.

Evolving is a specific process perpetually balancing as the universe inhabits space now. Power Of Suggestion vs Corrupted Persuasion Of Power beyond adapting as displaced ancestrally here now.

Context is used to communicate between lifetimes living previous generations and current generation gaps never same reproduction twice. Simple compounding results by the population in plain sight each rotation forward here, now.

Traditional facts of anything else is possible rules by laws commanding every great great grandchild stay loyal to power of suggestion or else humanity cancels their social identity.

Cannonpointer » 21 Sep 2025, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 7:36 pm

Is this the same BBC whose reporter stood in front of Tower 7 reading from a prepared script about it having collapsed, 20 minutes before it collapsed?

Is BBC NOT part of the MSM? Is BBC calling **** on the muslim takeover of england or the tranny narrative?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3e5KFyadUw

Damn

I forgot about that

Mrkelly » 21 Sep 2025, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Sep 2025, 3:57 pm

I meant bumped from the service 

not bumped off

Sure you did, unfortunately though, prior posts don't support that alibi.

Mrkelly » 22 Sep 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

22 Sep 2025, 7:33 am

Damn

I forgot about that

So did hooey, when he imbibed and spewed their dishonest narrative.

He claims he "used to" follow Candace. He's a liar. He never followed her.

He might have caught a couple of things before she was red pilled - back when little benny was cutting her checks.
 
The first time she dared question the all israel all the time narrative, she was out the door - and making more than before.