Liberal Forum

nefarious101 » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Hey Drippy the LGBTP Dickhead....

Who cares....save your fake outrage for all the scandals, theft and illegal **** going on in the LGBTP PEDO-Progressive Communist Islamocrat party.

Do you even realize who stupid you look coming in here day after day praising ***, thieves, illegals, fraud and failure?

You are the poster boy for dickheadism, fake news and the LGBTP

The AG of the State of Texas, currently under indictment, is a klepto...

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Sorry...

I was busy drafting my condemnation of Platner...

Did you just whip that ball back into the lib-prog court?

You are a little late on the Platner thing.  As far as Paxton, as you said about Platner, I can't vote in Texas.

So who should people vote for in TX and why?

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

nefarious101 » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

Hey Drippy the LGBTP Dickhead....

Who cares....save your fake outrage for all the scandals, theft and illegal **** going on in the LGBTP PEDO-Progressive Communist Islamocrat party.

Do you even realize who stupid you look coming in here day after day praising ***, thieves, illegals, fraud and failure?

You are the poster boy for dickheadism, fake news and the LGBTP

The AG of the State of Texas, currently under indictment, is a klepto...

 

Two things:
1.  Who should people vote for and why?

2.  When it is a democrat candidate that has issues you claim you can't vote in that state.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

The AG of the State of Texas, currently under indictment, is a klepto...

Now THAT'S A **** LIE!!!


The Attorney General of the State of Texas is Ken Paxton, who resolved his long-standing 2015 state securities fraud indictment in 2024 by agreeing to a deal that required paying a fee and completing community service to dismiss the charges.

Legal History and Controversies

• Securities Fraud Indictment: Ken Paxton was originally indicted on state securities fraud charges in 2015, but the case was delayed for years by legal battles before being resolved through a 2024 pretrial agreement.

• Impeachment: He was impeached by the Texas House in 2023 over allegations of corruption and abuse of office, but was subsequently acquitted by the Texas Senate. 

• Federal Investigation: A related federal investigation into similar corruption allegations was effectively ended when the U.S. Department of Justice declined to prosecute.

So you ENJOY me kicking your *** into a bloody **** pulp every day???

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

You are a little late on the Platner thing.  As far as Paxton, as you said about Platner, I can't vote in Texas.

So who should people vote for in TX and why?

But you're the one who demands condemnations and use the excuse of "state matter" to decline to do the same...

And Paxton is still the Grifty endorsed nominee for Senate.

 

Beekeeper » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Now THAT'S A **** LIE!!!

The Attorney General of the State of Texas is Ken Paxton, who resolved his long-standing 2015 state securities fraud indictment in 2024 by agreeing to a deal that required paying a fee and completing community service to dismiss the charges.

Legal History and Controversies

• Securities Fraud Indictment: Ken Paxton was originally indicted on state securities fraud charges in 2015, but the case was delayed for years by legal battles before being resolved through a 2024 pretrial agreement.

• Impeachment: He was impeached by the Texas House in 2023 over allegations of corruption and abuse of office, but was subsequently acquitted by the Texas Senate. 

• Federal Investigation: A related federal investigation into similar corruption allegations was effectively ended when the U.S. Department of Justice declined to prosecute.

So you ENJOY me kicking your *** into a bloody **** pulp every day???

My bad...he pleaded....


The klepto AG...
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

But you're the one who demands condemnations and use the excuse of "state matter" to decline to do the same...

And Paxton is still the Grifty endorsed nominee for Senate.

Since you are bitching about another state election you lost the right to claim you can't vote there.

Answer the question. Whom should Texans vote for and why?

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Two things:
1.  Who should people vote for and why?

2.  When it is a democrat candidate that has issues you claim you can't vote in that state.

What is this thread about?

2. Projectolass,

Don't run from your inclinations...
 

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Since you are bitching about another state election you lost the right to claim you can't vote there.

Answer the question. Whom should Texans vote for and why?

Post the rule.

This op is about what morons vote for...

You are far more qualified to answer for them than I am.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

What is this thread about?

2. Projectolass,

Don't run from your inclinations...

Remember, I treat your threads with the same respect you treat others.  You can't take it when people throw your own tactics into face.  

Whenever you bitch about a republican candidate or office holder you will be asked who would be better and why.  And each time you will run in ignorance.

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Post the rule.

This op is about what morons vote for...

You are far more qualified to answer for them than I am.

SO the question to you is whom should they vote for. Specifically in the TX race since YOU Used it as an example?  Why should they vote for Talarico?  Which of his positions do you like?  

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Remember, I treat your threads with the same respect you treat others.  

Remember that this is a lie...

You have always reserved the right to do as you please while spouting rules. 

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

SO the question to you is 

Why is there now "a question to" me at this point?

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

My bad...he pleaded....

The klepto AG...

FACTS, cupcake, will kick your *** AGAIN!!

No Guilt Admission: The deal allows Paxton to avoid a trial and potential prison sentence without entering a plea or admitting any wrongdoing

Wanna ADMIT you are a **** IDIOT NOW??

         

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Post the rule.

This op is about what morons vote for...

You are far more qualified to answer for them than I am.

SO the question to you is whom should they vote for. Specifically in the TX race since YOU Used it as an example?  Why should they vote for Talarico?  Which of his positions do you like?  

 

 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

SO the question to you is whom should they vote for. Specifically in the TX race since YOU Used it as an example?  Why should they vote for Talarico?  Which of his positions do you like?  
 

Why is there now "a question to" me at this point?

 

Read that without the edit.  I tell you why right there.  Are you a functioning moron?

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Remember, I treat your threads with the same respect you treat others.  

Remember that this is a lie...

You have always reserved the right to do as you please while spouting rules. 

 

Umm, you haven't always been here.  You did not get here until 2017.  You have no clue how I posted with others.  Generally, my rule has always been to post to someone the same way they post to me and others.  IF they **** up threads, I will **** up their threads.If they show respect I will show respect.  You get the same respect as you give others.  Which slim to none.
 

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Umm, you haven't always been here.  

Tiny,

No more retelling.

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Remember, I treat your threads with the same respect you treat others.  

Remember that this is a lie...

You have always reserved the right to do as you please while spouting rules. 


 

Umm, you haven't always been here.  You did not get here until 2017.  You have no clue how I posted with others.  Generally, my rule has always been to post to someone the same way they post to me and others.  IF they **** up threads, I will **** up their threads.If they show respect I will show respect.  You get the same respect as you give others.  Which slim to none.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Umm, you haven't always been here.  You did not get here until 2017.  You have no clue how I posted with others.  Generally, my rule has always been to post to someone the same way they post to me and others.  IF they **** up threads, I will **** up their threads.If they show respect I will show respect.  You get the same respect as you give others.  Which slim to none.

 

Tiny,

No more retelling.

 

That is not a retelling.  Fact. You did not join until 2017 when you were banned elsewhere.  I have been posting with some of these people since 2011, before this forum existed.  


 

Blackvegetable » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

49 minutes ago

The AG of the State of Texas, currently under indictment, is a klepto...

Who cares' Drippy.....you're just a LGBTP dickhead with no credibility at all

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

That is not a retelling.  

Not only does your recall suck, your comprehension is every bit as terrible.