Liberal Forum

Kirk practiced his free speech....gets murdered. 
Kimmel practices his free speech...causes outrage that he was cancelled. Back on air again.

Got a love you hypocrites. 


 

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 11:21 am

Kirk practiced his free speech....gets murdered. 
Kimmel practices his free speech...causes outrage that he was cancelled. Back on air again.

Got a love you hypocrites. 

That makes no sense 

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 11:43 am

That makes no sense

What exactly are you confused about?

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 11:45 am

What exactly are you confused about?

about what you are trying to say

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 11:46 am

about what you are trying to say

Well...it is pretty straight forward. How far back do I need to dumb it down? I doubt I can make it simpler. 

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 11:52 am

Well...it is pretty straight forward. How far back do I need to dumb it down? I doubt I can make it simpler.

how do you figure it’s hypocrisy? 

give an example 

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 11:55 am

how do you figure it’s hypocrisy? 

give an example

Kirk Practiced free speech => murdered. 
Kimmel practice free speech => the left demands him to continue. 

WTF are you not getting?

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:00 pm

Kirk Practiced free speech => murdered. 
Kimmel practice free speech => the left demands him to continue. 

WTF are you not getting?

  do you not know the meaning of hypocrisy?

 

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:18 pm

  do you not know the meaning of hypocrisy?

Clearly you don't. 

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:19 pm

Clearly you don't.

Hypocrisy is the practice of engaging in behavior or holding beliefs that are contrary to one's stated moral principles or expressed feelings, often involving a pretense of virtue, belief, or feeling that is not genuinely held.

where is the hypocrisy?

who has said anything that can remotely make your point?

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:23 pm

Hypocrisy is the practice of engaging in behavior or holding beliefs that are contrary to one's stated moral principles or expressed feelings, often involving a pretense of virtue, belief, or feeling that is not genuinely held.

where is the hypocrisy?

who has said anything that can remotely make your point?

They cherish free speech for themselves, but not for everyone else. Free speech for them = good. Free speech for others = death. 

Hypocrisy ^^^
 

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:23 pm

Hypocrisy is the practice of engaging in behavior or holding beliefs that are contrary to one's stated moral principles or expressed feelings, often involving a pretense of virtue, belief, or feeling that is not genuinely held.

where is the hypocrisy?

who has said anything that can remotely make your point?

hypocrite /hĭp′ə-krĭt″/
noun

1. A person given to hypocrisy. 
2. One who plays a part; especially, one who, for the purpose of winning approbation of favor, puts on a fair outside seeming; one who feigns to be other and better than he is; a false pretender to virtue or piety; one who simulates virtue or piety. 
3. A person who professes beliefs and opinions that he or she does not hold in order to conceal his or her real feelings or motives.

 
 

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:38 pm

They cherish free speech for themselves, but not for everyone else. Free speech for them = good. Free speech for others = death. 

Hypocrisy ^^^

someone must've changed the meaning and we never got the memo...            
 

ROG62 » 23 Sep 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:46 pm

someone must've changed the meaning and we never got the memo...          

I can't tell if he is serious or just trolling. 

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:38 pm

They cherish free speech for themselves, but not for everyone else. Free speech for them = good. Free speech for others = death. 

Hypocrisy ^^^

Show me where people have said that Charlie didn't have free speech

But Kimmel did
 

ROG62 » 23 Sep 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 12:46 pm

someone must've changed the meaning and we never got the memo...          

Your turn

Who said that Charlie didn't have free speech?
 

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 2:24 pm

Your turn

Who said that Charlie didn't have free speech?

Nobody! God man. The point was that he was practicing free speech and was killed because of it. 

Sheeeesh..Do I need to get the crayons?
 

Vegas » 23 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 2:30 pm

Nobody! God man. The point was that he was practicing free speech and was killed because of it. 

Sheeeesh..Do I need to get the crayons?

how in the hell is that hypocrisy?

Maybe you were thinking ironic?

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 2:24 pm

Your turn

Who said that Charlie didn't have free speech?

**** you Mr queerly you **** spewing lying leftist traitor cocksucker.

Tell us Mr queerly, what has Kirk been saying recently since his speech is so free? 

Mrkelly » 23 Sep 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Sep 2025, 2:33 pm

how in the hell is that hypocrisy?

Maybe you were thinking ironic?

Forget it. You are hopeless.