So you took Ivermectin on faith.Fuelman » 02 Oct 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ Do you have another stupid question?
After the fact studies have shown you idiots were wrong of course.
Does ivermectin have a place in the treatment of mild Covid-19? - PMC https://share.google/EIlynM7mzVDyfyWeI
How do you know it was COVID-19?ROG62 » 02 Oct 2025, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑ WTF you blathering about? nothing to retell...a 36 hr dry cough...I've had paper cuts that were more debilitating...
DUH! I was tested...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You jerk men who are grouped in a circle.
A "dry cough" and you had yourself tested?
brown, read your **** question, nod, or 'sprain what you're looking for...otherwise ****...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Your stupid is not my problemROG62 » 02 Oct 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ brown, read your **** question, nod, or 'sprain what you're looking for...otherwise ****...
Circlesok....im2+1132 minutes ago
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
How many times have you had Covid?
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The wife had already tested positive...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Digital Stutter is back. Circle Jerkin it Vegas.Vegas » 02 Oct 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
Deal:
Blackvegetable » 02 Oct 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ So you took Ivermectin on faith.
You should read this stuff first..
Since in most countries ivermectin has not been approved for COVID treatment, performing ivermectin vs. placebo studies appears to be unethical when these two newer drugs have been officially approved by health-authorities. However, offering ivermectin to those who refuse the new drugs seems to be a reasonable option. Since eligibility criteria in getting these early treatments are targeted to high-risk patients only (although the definition of high risk might differ from one country to the other), observing the outcome of these arms of treatment: paxlovid vs. molnupiravir vs. ivermectin might shed light on the value of ivermectin in comparison to the newer drugs. Since, undoubtedly there will be patients who will refuse any treatment, they in fact can serve as a control arm receiving SOC (standard of care).
Your stupid is advancing Siunz...
Coozie is fine with it.....unless it litters his inbox.....in which case he gets hysterical.
Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2025, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ However, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes with ivermectin on the clinical progression and symptoms in the two groups, in keeping with most other recently reported well-conducted large-scale clinical trials [13,14,15,16]
It means you lose.*Beekeeper » 03 Oct 2025, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Correct.
Do you even know what that means, SUCKFACE??
Doubtful.
The Undefeeeeted Too...*Beekeeper » 03 Oct 2025, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. I never lose. YOU do, but I never lose because I HAVE FACTS that you refuse to accept.
Nod.