Oh....my bad.Cannonpointer » 29 Sep 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ I gave you two sentences. Then the propaganda started.
Yep. That's it. And how many more 18-25 yr. olds will die because of ego?Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2025, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑
but tRumps ego couldn’t take Putin being the boss in this case
Ukrainian Snipers with Thermal Scope Take Down Russian Troops - YouTubeCannonpointer » 28 Sep 2025, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Russia has ten times the people Coupkraine has. And those people are eager to fight for their country in a patriotic war to prevent NATO missiles on their border. Much like how americans felt about soviet missiles in cuba.
Coupkraine is using kidnap victims and mercenaries, because they have VERY few people eager to be used as cannon fodder in their meatwave attacks.
Every NATO weapon sent to date - the patriots batteries, the abrams, the atacms, nasams, stingers, hawks, f-16s, t-72b's, bradleys, stikers, mraps, javelins, tow missiles, mi-17s, harms - etc., - they have all been blown to **** by the russians. ALL OF THOSE SYSTEMS were going to turn the tide. None of them did - they all got shot to ****. The same thing will happen to the next round of last-century MIC trash.
The US MIC is producing the best and most expensive toys that the 20th century could devise. Those are great for shock and awe campaigns in countries where camels are seen more often on highways than in zoos.
Russia will continue its war of attrition against the US and europe, who are using ukrainians to do the dying while NATO weapons do what little killing the west is managing to do.
In order to believe that Russia is losing, you have to be a spoon-fed, propagandized moron who is willing to trust the EXACT SAME PEOPLE who tell you that a man can magically become a woman.
And one more thing. Coupkraine is not a biden war. Trump has bragged many, many times that he was the first toprovide offensive weapons and the first toapply harsh sanctions. He has been in on it since he inherited the mess from OBAMA.
You poor thing. You think that video is anything but a show of extreme desperation?
Disaster for Putin as more than 20,000 Russian soldiers go awolCannonpointer » 28 Sep 2025, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Russia has ten times the people Coupkraine has. And those people are eager to fight for their country in a patriotic war to prevent NATO missiles on their border. Much like how americans felt about soviet missiles in cuba.
MSN, mediazona, and newsweek.MR-7 » 30 Sep 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ Disaster for Putin as more than 20,000 Russian soldiers go awol
North Korean Troops Deserting Ukraine Frontline:
Report A soldier’s last resort. Russian AWOL figures soar, surpassing full ...
I can read/see all that eagerness. The 3-year invasion by Putin will be over by Christmas
I'm with TRUMP. Putin is a paper tiger.Trump reverses Ukraine stance, now supports retaking RussianAnything else bothering you Fruity?Cannonpointer » 30 Sep 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ MSN, mediazona, and newsweek.
All far left. All pro-tranny, just like those who take their word for ****.
Now, how long have you been a tranny supporting leftist ****, you moron?
Don't you DARE spew their **** at me, you ***, and then lie that you are a conjob.
HOW LONG, cock sucker? How long have they had your ear?
Queer, you are with the three media outlets you spewed at me. You're a democ rat who likes Trump.MR-7 » 30 Sep 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ I'm with TRUMP. Putin is a paper tiger.Trump reverses Ukraine stance, now supports retaking RussianAnything else bothering you Fruity?
Two weeks ago, we noted that Russia was facing gasoline shortages dues to repeated drone strikes on Russian refineries. The problems, starting with outlying regions and occupied Crimea, have worsened fast and spread across much of the country. Rising prices, long queues, rationing, and in in some cases, pumps running dry are becoming part of life in Russia.Cannonpointer » 30 Sep 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Russia continues to advance, and all the propaganda in the world will not change that no matter HOW many homosexuals buy into it.
Better than the Ruskies.
Russia is going to lose BIGLY. Ukraine is killing their oil refineries deep into Russia. And now, TRUMP has told NATO to shoot down any Russian jets that come into their air space. And TRUMP has told Zelenski to take his land back.PhiloBeddo » 01 Oct 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Russia has Nukes. You cannot go to war with Russia. It's a war that cannot be won.
Yet the line of conftact is moving west.MR-7 » 01 Oct 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ Two weeks ago, we noted that Russia was facing gasoline shortages dues to repeated drone strikes...
...moving west.MR-7 » 01 Oct 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ The problems, starting with outlying regions and occupied Crimea, have worsened fast and spread across much of the country...
I WOULD question you about your time in Russia. But I know you are just spewing propaganda.
... still moving west.
Media-Bias Fact-Check:MR-7 » 01 Oct 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ Russia Moves to Extend Gasoline Export Ban Until 2026 as Shortages Persist - The Moscow Times
I wonder if The Moscow Times is a left leaning paper...
If you are capable of understanding the bias fact check, you'll grasp that the Moscow Times is not known for lying, but their editorial policy (AGENDA) is left of center, and what they choose to focus on and how they focus on it will be affected by this. Clearly, they want people to oppose the SMO in Coupkraine.LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.
Overall, we rate the Moscow Times Left-Center Biased based on an editorial bias that generally favors the left and rejects the authoritarian right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Damn, you blew up @MR-7 's pipeline.Cannonpointer » 01 Oct 2025, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Yet the line of conftact is moving west.
...moving west.
I WOULD question you about your time in Russia. But I know you are just spewing propaganda.
The Russian people do not want NATO's missiles on their border. You are stunted emotionally and socially - can't put yourself in their shoes.
If you had the character to do so, you would understand why they support Putin and that the this **** about "tolerating" it is western propaganda.
I challenge you to provide ONE source which has not referred to men as women. Forbes is deep in the tank on the tranny ****. You are relying on leftist trans agitators, while asking this board to believe you are a conservative. You are slapping yourself.
You rely on sources that are in the tank for the trans movement, for every war this century, the attacks on Rittenhouse and Zimmerman, the covid fax, Ivermectin being "horse medicine," and attacking Trump any time they think they can get away with it. Those are the people **** in your ear. Then you spew the **** at me like you're a clever fellow for "knowing" this stuff - for being so "informed."
... still moving west.
Media-Bias Fact-Check:
If you are capable of understanding the bias fact check, you'll grasp that the Moscow Times is not known for lying, but their editorial policy (AGENDA) is left of center, and what they choose to focus on and how they focus on it will be affected by this. Clearly, they want people to oppose the SMO in Coupkraine.
The Russian people are behind Putin. They love him. AND THEY UNDERSTAND THAT THE CONFLICT IN COUPKRAINE IS EXISTENTIAL TO RUSSIA - just as Americans understood why Kennedy brought us to the brink of nuclear war over the Cuban missile bases.
You need to grow up and practice thinking man thoughts - stop being a programmable girl.
Russian forces failed to take Kyiv in the opening weeks.Cannonpointer » 01 Oct 2025, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Yet the line of conftact is moving west.
...moving west.
I WOULD question you about your time in Russia. But I know you are just spewing propaganda.
The Russian people do not want NATO's missiles on their border. You are stunted emotionally and socially - can't put yourself in their shoes.
If you had the character to do so, you would understand why they support Putin and that the this **** about "tolerating" it is western propaganda.
I challenge you to provide ONE source which has not referred to men as women. Forbes is deep in the tank on the tranny ****. You are relying on leftist trans agitators, while asking this board to believe you are a conservative. You are slapping yourself.
You rely on sources that are in the tank for the trans movement, for every war this century, the attacks on Rittenhouse and Zimmerman, the covid fax, Ivermectin being "horse medicine," and attacking Trump any time they think they can get away with it. Those are the people **** in your ear. Then you spew the **** at me like you're a clever fellow for "knowing" this stuff - for being so "informed."
... still moving west.
Media-Bias Fact-Check:
If you are capable of understanding the bias fact check, you'll grasp that the Moscow Times is not known for lying, but their editorial policy (AGENDA) is left of center, and what they choose to focus on and how they focus on it will be affected by this. Clearly, they want people to oppose the SMO in Coupkraine.
The Russian people are behind Putin. They love him. AND THEY UNDERSTAND THAT THE CONFLICT IN COUPKRAINE IS EXISTENTIAL TO RUSSIA - just as Americans understood why Kennedy brought us to the brink of nuclear war over the Cuban missile bases.
You need to grow up and practice thinking man thoughts - stop being a programmable girl.
You're a **** imbecile....MR-7 » 28 Sep 2025, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑ Of course he did you Slack Jawed Cretin MoFo....Not once, but twice under BIG EARS Barry, and KID SNIFFER joey. He knew they were weak.
Russia failed to take Odesa, Mykolaiv, or Kyiv—key strategic targets.Russia has lost thousands of tanks, armored vehicles, and aircraft.Western sanctions have crippled Russia’s ability to replenish advanced tech.Russia’s GDP shrank dramatically in 2022 and remains volatile.Over 1,000 foreign companies exited Russia.The ruble has been devalued repeatedly, and inflation is highRussia is diplomatically isolated from the West, Japan, South Korea, and much of Europe.NATO has expanded—Finland and Sweden joined, directly countering Russia’s stated goals.MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ Russian forces failed to take Kyiv in the opening weeks.
They were forced to retreat from northern Ukraine by April 2022.
The war has dragged on for over 3 years, with no end in sight
Russia has lost over half of its initial territorial gains since 2022.
Ukraine recaptured Kherson and pushed Russian forces out of Kharkiv oblast.
Russia failed to take Odesa, Mykolaiv, or Kyiv—key strategic targets.
Russia has lost thousands of tanks, armored vehicles, and aircraft.
Western sanctions have crippled Russia’s ability to replenish advanced tech.
Russia’s GDP shrank dramatically in 2022 and remains volatile.
Over 1,000 foreign companies exited Russia.
The ruble has been devalued repeatedly, and inflation is high
Russia is diplomatically isolated from the West, Japan, South Korea, and much of Europe.
NATO has expanded—Finland and Sweden joined, directly countering Russia’s stated goals.
Russia’s recent gains (e.g., Avdiivka) are tactically minor and come at enormous cost.
Ukraine continues to strike deep into Russian logistics hubs, oil refineries, and command centers.
The “westward movement” is not strategic dominance—it’s attritional warfare.
You challenged me to cite a source that hasn’t “referred to men as women.” That’s a red herring. The validity of war reporting doesn’t hinge on gender politics. Site your own UNBIASED source. YOU CAN"T!
You’re right that propaganda is everywhere. But the facts are brutal: Russia is bleeding men, money, and machines. Ukraine is still standing. NATO is stronger. And Putin’s dream of a quick victory has turned into a long, grinding disaster.
AS A MATTER OF FACT....I CHALLENGE YOU TO PROVE ANY OF THE ABOVE WRONG. NO ONE WANTS TO HEAR YOUR **** UP OPINION. SHOW THOSE "SOURCES" you have, that prove me wrong.
@Johnny You