Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 02 Oct 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 8:12 am

Russia failed to take Odesa, Mykolaiv, or Kyiv—key strategic targets.Russia has lost thousands of tanks, armored vehicles, and aircraft.Western sanctions have crippled Russia’s ability to replenish advanced tech.Russia’s GDP shrank dramatically in 2022 and remains volatile.Over 1,000 foreign companies exited Russia.The ruble has been devalued repeatedly, and inflation is highRussia is diplomatically isolated from the West, Japan, South Korea, and much of Europe.NATO has expanded—Finland and Sweden joined, directly countering Russia’s stated goals.

under which US presdident, and in spite of which US political party?

Take a stand. Either Russia is failing, or it's propaganda. If the above is propaganda, then prove it. It's your move MoFo.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Oct 2025, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 8:09 am

You're a **** imbecile....

 

Crimea Annexation:
In February–March 2014, Russian troops—initially disguised as “little green men” without insignia—occupied and annexed Crimea. Putin later admitted they were Russian soldiers

February 24, 2022: Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, attacking from multiple directions—north (toward Kyiv), east (Donbas), and south (from Crimea).

And you are a **** LIAR.   
 

JohnnyYou » 02 Oct 2025, 2:43 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 2:43 am

Damn, you blew up @MR-7  's pipeline.

It's a good time to figure out how to turn soybeans to biofuel.  We got a shytload that are going to rot in the field.  The farmers shouldn't even invest in harvesting them with no place to sell them. Silo vacancy is at a premium.

Why can't wr sell them? The world needs food...
 
Edit: Never mind, I googled it.

APPARENTLY, those damned chinamen are trying to start a trade war!

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am

Russian forces failed to take Kyiv in the opening weeks.
They were forced to retreat from northern Ukraine by April 2022.
The war has dragged on for over 3 years, with no end in sight
Russia has lost over half of its initial territorial gains since 2022.
Ukraine recaptured Kherson and pushed Russian forces out of Kharkiv oblast.
Russia failed to take Odesa, Mykolaiv, or Kyiv—key strategic targets.
Russia has lost thousands of tanks, armored vehicles, and aircraft.
Western sanctions have crippled Russia’s ability to replenish advanced tech.
Russia’s GDP shrank dramatically in 2022 and remains volatile.
Over 1,000 foreign companies exited Russia.
The ruble has been devalued repeatedly, and inflation is high
Russia is diplomatically isolated from the West, Japan, South Korea, and much of Europe.
NATO has expanded—Finland and Sweden joined, directly countering Russia’s stated goals.
Russia’s recent gains (e.g., Avdiivka) are tactically minor and come at enormous cost.
Ukraine continues to strike deep into Russian logistics hubs, oil refineries, and command centers.

Mostly propaganda - not gonna give it my time right now, as my time right now is limited.

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am

The “westward movement” is not strategic dominance—it’s attritional warfare.

You can't admit that this is a war of attrition and keep pretending that a country with 10% of its foe's population is "winning," ya fruitcake.

You need to find a narrative and stick to it. By definition, Coupkraine cannot win a war of attrition duh.

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am

You challenged me to cite a source that hasn’t “referred to men as women.” That’s a red herring. The validity of war reporting doesn’t hinge on gender politics. Site your own UNBIASED source. YOU CAN"T!

That is NOT a red herring.

You and I are in complete agreement that anyone who says men can be women are liars. Relying on KNOWN LIARS for your "facts" makes you a simple homosexual, with gayness and queerness well-marbled into the ***.

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am

You’re right that propaganda is everywhere. But the facts are brutal: Russia is bleeding men, money, and machines.

No, the propaganda is brutal. Every week we are told of Russia's atrocities against Coupkraine. How many brutal atrocities can Coupkraine withstand? Could someone be lying about the atrocities? Or about Coupkraine still standing? I say it's laying down and taking Russian cock hard.

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am

Ukraine is still standing. NATO is stronger. And Putin’s dream of a quick victory has turned into a long, grinding disaster.

"Long, grinding disasters" is the actual phrase you find if you google, "Russian wars."

The disaster belongs to Coupkraine. And you just admitted that NATO is a party to this war. That was kind of stupid. You're supposed to lie about that.

YOU JUST ADMITTED THAT NATO IS LOSING GROUND TO RUSSIA, you **** dummy. And that Coupkraine is NOT "standing." It's being propped up and used as a yuman shield for NATO's war with Russia. NATOis fighting Russia to the last Coupkrainian.

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 7:41 am

AS A MATTER OF FACT....I CHALLENGE YOU TO PROVE ANY OF THE ABOVE WRONG. NO ONE WANTS TO HEAR YOUR **** UP OPINION. SHOW THOSE "SOURCES" you have, that prove me wrong.

My sources include the western MSM propaganda machine, you poor girl. I just know how to comprehend it. I rely on Ukrainska Pravda anmd the New Voice of Ukraine and the pro-Ukrainian "DeepState" map for my facts regarding the line of contact. 

You have only narrative providers.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 02 Oct 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 11:31 am

Mostly propaganda - not gonna give it my time right now, as my time right now is limited.

 

Propaganda involves distortion, exaggeration, or omission. My post is Factually grounded in current reporting and military analysis. It is Balanced in acknowledging both Ukrainian successes and Russian persistence. It is Consistent with independent sources like Al Jazeera, RBC Ukraine, and EMPR Media. It’s not propaganda—it’s a concise, evidence-based summary of the war’s trajectory. If anything, it’s a sobering reminder of how costly and unresolved this conflict remains.

You're not gonna give it time because you can't refute any of it. Mostly propaganda MY ***.

The US is set to provide Ukraine with intelligence to support long-range strikes on energy infrastructure targets deep inside Russia, according to US outlets.

The decision marks a crucial step and signals a significant shift in Washington's stance on supporting Ukraine, as it proves a strengthening US commitment to assist the country, despite Moscow's continued rejection of direct negotiations with Kyiv.

US officials reportedly said the intelligence will allow Ukraine to target “refineries, pipelines, power stations and other infrastructure far from its borders," with Washington urging NATO allies to follow suit and expand similar cooperation.

With the situation worsening over the past weeks, Russia is reportedly preparing to import petrol from China, South Korea and Singapore to offset a growing domestic fuel shortage.

US intelligence sharing to help Ukraine knock out even more Russia’s refining capacity

I don't see how Russia can win this war. Their economy is starting to crumble, and the west can keep up the support for Ukraine forever. What is Putin going to do? As this war drags on, look for Putin to get more desperate. He really bit off more than he could chew. He's trapped.
 
 

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm

Propaganda involves distortion, exaggeration, or omission. My post is Factually grounded in current reporting and military analysis.

Current reporting is that men can be women. You rely on *** news, which explains your ***-speak.

Your so-called military analysis is cheap narrative driven by agenda - not "facts."

There is nothing "factually grounded" about your spoon-fed fruit salad.

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm

It is Balanced in acknowledging both Ukrainian successes and Russian persistence.

That was truly gay - thanks for the laugh!

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm

It is Consistent with independent sources like Al Jazeera, RBC Ukraine, and EMPR Media. It’s not propaganda—it’s a concise, evidence-based summary of the war’s trajectory. If anything, it’s a sobering reminder of how costly and unresolved this conflict remains.

RBC Coupkraine is an "independent" source?

You don't have **** from al jazeera backing your NAMBLA narrative, you lying fruitcake.

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 3:06 pm

You're not gonna give it time because you can't refute any of it. Mostly propaganda MY ***.

Oh, heck - I had best invest time dealing with your gish gallop, or you'll say something out of your ***.
 

MR-7 » 02 Oct 2025, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Oct 2025, 3:51 pm

The US is set to provide Ukraine with intelligence to support long-range strikes on energy infrastructure targets deep inside Russia, according to US outlets.

The decision marks a crucial step and signals a significant shift in Washington's stance on supporting Ukraine, as it proves a strengthening US commitment to assist the country, despite Moscow's continued rejection of direct negotiations with Kyiv.

US officials reportedly said the intelligence will allow Ukraine to target “refineries, pipelines, power stations and other infrastructure far from its borders," with Washington urging NATO allies to follow suit and expand similar cooperation.

With the situation worsening over the past weeks, Russia is reportedly preparing to import petrol from China, South Korea and Singapore to offset a growing domestic fuel shortage.

no spam

I don't see how Russia can win this war. Their economy is starting to crumble, and the west can keep up the support for Ukraine forever. What is Putin going to do? As this war drags on, look for Putin to get more desperate. He really bit off more than he could chew. He's trapped.

Launch the Flamingos!  Write "If Putin reads this your gay" on it.

MR-7 » 30 Sep 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Sep 2025, 11:27 am

I'm with TRUMP. Putin is a paper tiger.Trump reverses Ukraine stance, now supports retaking RussianAnything else bothering you Fruity?

No, but here is something to bother you, Mary.

AI Overview

View all
The Financial Times reported that Russia has upgraded its Iskander and Kinzhal missiles to bypass Patriot air defense systems by enabling them to change course mid-flight and dive at steeper angles to "confuse and evade" interceptors. This adaptation has significantly lowered Ukraine's missile interception rates, with a drop from 37% in August to just 6% in September 2025, and is seen as a "game-changer" favoring Russia. 



Now, I am curious how the ****** community views a 6% success rate on the interception of cheap Russian missiles by expenjsive Patriot batteries. 

6%, fruitcake. Run your cock-holster about that. 
 

MR-7 » 30 Sep 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

30 Sep 2025, 11:27 am

I'm with TRUMP. Putin is a paper tiger.Trump reverses Ukraine stance, now supports retaking RussianAnything else bothering you Fruity?

What a lovely world it would be, were you capable of enjoying with me the irony that the U.S. providing the Coupkrainians with Patriots gave Russia free practice dummies to learn how to beat the Patriots while only having to fight puny Coupkraine while doing it.       

By the time the US and the European countries are able to sell you stupid **** eaters on WWIII, Russia will be sitting like a spider in a web.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Oct 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:14 pm

No, but here is something to bother you, Mary.

AI Overview

View all
The Financial Times reported that Russia has upgraded its Iskander and Kinzhal missiles to bypass Patriot air defense systems by enabling them to change course mid-flight and dive at steeper angles to "confuse and evade" interceptors. This adaptation has significantly lowered Ukraine's missile interception rates, with a drop from 37% in August to just 6% in September 2025, and is seen as a "game-changer" favoring Russia. 

Now, I am curious how the ****** community views a 6% success rate on the interception of cheap Russian missiles by expenjsive Patriot batteries. 

6%, fruitcake. Run your cock-holster about that.

Thanks Cannonpointer...

CoPilot, is this true or fake news

Yes, Russia has reportedly upgraded its Iskander-M and Kinzhal missiles to perform evasive maneuvers—steep dives and mid-course shifts—to make interception harder for Patriot systems........ That’s not fake news. But calling this a “game-changer” is a stretch, and here's why:

The drop to 6% interception in September reflects a tactical shift, not a permanent failure. Ukraine and its Western partners are already analyzing flight data and adjusting engagement protocols

Patriot batteries are software upgradable. The same way Russia tweaked its guidance algorithms, Raytheon and Lockheed Martin can recalibrate intercept logic and radar tracking to counter new missile behaviors

Iskander and Kinzhal missiles cost millions per unit. They’re not mass-produced throwaways. Russia’s stockpile is finite, and each launch is a strategic decision.

The Kinzhal, in particular, is launched from MiG-31K aircraft—an expensive, limited platform. These aren’t backyard bottle rockets.

Ukraine uses a mix of systems: Soviet-era S-300s, IRIS-T, NASAMS, and France-Italy’s SAMP/T. Patriot is just one piece of the puzzle

Even if Patriots miss, other systems can intercept cruise missiles, drones, and aircraft. The 6% stat applies narrowly to ballistic missile interception—not total air defense.

These maneuver tweaks are late-stage desperation to overcome Western tech. They don’t change the fact that Russia’s missile inventory is aging, and its industrial base is strained.

Ukraine’s Western partners are already responding with new interceptors, better radar software, and expanded coverage

A temporary dip in interception rates doesn’t mean Ukraine is defenseless. It means the arms race continues. Russia made a move. Ukraine and NATO will counter. That’s the rhythm of modern warfare.
 

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

Yes, Russia has reportedly upgraded its Iskander-M and Kinzhal missiles to perform evasive maneuvers—steep dives and mid-course shifts—to make interception harder for Patriot systems........ That’s not fake news. But calling this a “game-changer” is a stretch, and here's why:

It is FINANCIAL TIMES calling this development a "game changer." The FT is rated least biased, high credibility by media bias fact check.

Co-pilot?

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

The drop to 6% interception in September reflects a tactical shift, not a permanent failure. Ukraine and its Western partners are already analyzing flight data and adjusting engagement protocols

They can "analyyze" until the cows come home. Russia owns the skies over Coupkraine.

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

Patriot batteries are software upgradable. The same way Russia tweaked its guidance algorithms, Raytheon and Lockheed Martin can recalibrate intercept logic and radar tracking to counter new missile behaviors

Until further notice, RUSSIA OWNS THE SKIES, bitch.

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

Iskander and Kinzhal missiles cost millions per unit. They’re not mass-produced throwaways. Russia’s stockpile is finite, and each launch is a strategic decision.

The Kinzhal, in particular, is launched from MiG-31K aircraft—an expensive, limited platform. These aren’t backyard bottle rockets.

A Patriot battery exported and set up costs from $2.37 to $2.5 billion.

The missiles cost millions - each interdiction uses two.

Stopping a Russian missile - IN THE 6% IT IS SUCCESSFUL - is a 100 times more than the intercepted missile.

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

Ukraine uses a mix of systems: Soviet-era S-300s, IRIS-T, NASAMS, and France-Italy’s SAMP/T. Patriot is just one piece of the puzzle

That soviet era tech is impressive.

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

Even if Patriots miss, other systems can intercept cruise missiles, drones, and aircraft. The 6% stat applies narrowly to ballistic missile interception—not total air defense.

These maneuver tweaks are late-stage desperation to overcome Western tech. They don’t change the fact that Russia’s missile inventory is aging, and its industrial base is strained.

Russia has hypersonic missiles. The US has only supersonic. Do the math on whose missiles are more technically advanced, child. It looks to me like the directions you gave copilot were more particular than you let on. 

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

Ukraine’s Western partners are already responding with new interceptors, better radar software, and expanded coverage

No.

Coupkraine's western partners don't know a man from a woman. They're morons.

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:25 pm

A temporary dip in interception rates doesn’t mean Ukraine is defenseless. It means the arms race continues. Russia made a move. Ukraine and NATO will counter. That’s the rhythm of modern warfare.

The dip is only temporary when the west gets its hands on the algorithm. It's permanent until then, sonny.

You side with *** and tranny news - because it represents you best. If it did not, you would not find it so compelling. You're a closet cock magnet, is my best guess.

 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Oct 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 2:55 pm

It is FINANCIAL TIMES calling this development a "game changer." The FT is rated least biased, high credibility by media bias fact check.

Russia’s GDP:
2022: Top 10 economy 
2025: Outranked by pasta and maple syrup   

Now smaller than Italy and Canada    
Sanctions + war spending = economic nosedive   
Source: IMF, World Bank, Wikipedia GDP rankings   
🪖 Russia’s war budget: billions WTF
Russia’s GDP: shrinking   
Military might without economic muscle = cosplay empire   

Russia’s economy is now a cautionary tale. You can’t bomb your way into the top 10. Superpower status revoked. Spreadsheet confirmed.

 
 

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 3:15 pm

Russia’s GDP:
2022: Top 10 economy 
2025: Outranked by pasta and maple syrup   

Now smaller than Italy and Canada    
Sanctions + war spending = economic nosedive   
Source: IMF, World Bank, Wikipedia GDP rankings   
🪖 Russia’s war budget: billions WTF
Russia’s GDP: shrinking   
Military might without economic muscle = cosplay empire   

Russia’s economy is now a cautionary tale. You can’t bomb your way into the top 10. Superpower status revoked. Spreadsheet confirmed.

Your numbers are for **** - they're a fantasy.

Just for STARTERS, you are comparing a physical economy to financialized economies. That's apples to fishes. Throw some PPP in there and see what happens. 

For enders, Russia's GDP isgrowing faster than that of any western country - not shrinking, as your trans-sources lie.

And all that **** in the middle? You are certainly correct that the sanctions have had an effect. But that hard-to-swallow pill has been medicinal. Russia has been forced to operate without SWIFT and under extreme sanctions - has learned how to do it and has shown the world that it can be done. Meanwhile, Germany is the sick man of Europe without the cheap Russian gas. The EU nations are running on debt - same as the U.S. 

The biggest problem between the two of us - beyond your affinity for all-tranny all-the-time information - is the enormous chasm of ignorance that I have to shout across even to speak to you. You have no idea when the war started, how the war started, who is fighting it, why they are fighting it, or where things actually stand today. You can SEE the line continuing to move west, but you are TOLD the Russians are losing. 

You know that what your eyes perceive is opposed to what your ears perceive.
You know that what your ears perceive comes from the people who say Trump is a rapist and Joey won the election.
Yet you continue to believe what you hear over what you see, and you accept without any caution the "news" that the tranny media feeds you. 

If you were smarter, you would be much easier to educate. 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Oct 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 3:36 pm

Your numbers are for **** - they're a fantasy.

Just for STARTERS, you are comparing a physical economy to financialized economies. That's apples to fishes. Throw some PPP in there and see what happens. 

For enders, Russia's GDP isgrowing faster than that of any western country - not shrinking, as your trans-sources lie.

And all that **** in the middle? You are certainly correct that the sanctions have had an effect. But that hard-to-swallow pill has been medicinal. Russia has been forced to operate without SWIFT and under extreme sanctions - has learned how to do it and has shown the world that it can be done. Meanwhile, Germany is the sick man of Europe without the cheap Russian gas. The EU nations are running on debt - same as the U.S. 

The biggest problem between the two of us - beyond your affinity for all-tranny all-the-time information - is the enormous chasm of ignorance that I have to shout across even to speak to you. You have no idea when the war started, how the war started, who is fighting it, why they are fighting it, or where things actually stand today. You can SEE the line continuing to move west, but you are TOLD the Russians are losing. 

You know that what your eyes perceive is opposed to what your ears perceive.
You know that what your ears perceive comes from the people who say Trump is a rapist and Joey won the election.
Yet you continue to believe what you hear over what you see, and you accept without any caution the "news" that the tranny media feeds you. 

If you were smarter, you would be much easier to educate.

Try to educate yourself and try providing something that shows Russia is ranked under the number 11. We know, it's a "tranny" report.  Yet your report is nothing but your **** opinion. 

Russia’s economy isn’t surging—it’s surviving. It’s not leading the global pack—it’s limping behind the Asian tigers and barely outpacing the EU’s slow lane. And calling Western sources “trans” doesn’t change the math—it just makes the cope louder.

Russia vs European Economy: Nominal & PPP GDP In 2025 - Brilliant Maps




 

Cannonpointer » 06 Oct 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 3:36 pm

Your numbers are for **** - they're a fantasy.

Just for STARTERS, you are comparing a physical economy to financialized economies. That's apples to fishes. Throw some PPP in there and see what happens. 

For enders, Russia's GDP isgrowing faster than that of any western country - not shrinking, as your trans-sources lie.

And all that **** in the middle? You are certainly correct that the sanctions have had an effect. But that hard-to-swallow pill has been medicinal. Russia has been forced to operate without SWIFT and under extreme sanctions - has learned how to do it and has shown the world that it can be done. Meanwhile, Germany is the sick man of Europe without the cheap Russian gas. The EU nations are running on debt - same as the U.S. 

The biggest problem between the two of us - beyond your affinity for all-tranny all-the-time information - is the enormous chasm of ignorance that I have to shout across even to speak to you. You have no idea when the war started, how the war started, who is fighting it, why they are fighting it, or where things actually stand today. You can SEE the line continuing to move west, but you are TOLD the Russians are losing. 

You know that what your eyes perceive is opposed to what your ears perceive.
You know that what your ears perceive comes from the people who say Trump is a rapist and Joey won the election.
Yet you continue to believe what you hear over what you see, and you accept without any caution the "news" that the tranny media feeds you. 

If you were smarter, you would be much easier to educate.

How's that PPP working out for you that I posted with a link?   
 

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 4:41 pm

How's that PPP working out for you that I posted with a link? 

Probably not as much profit as he makes on his unvaxxed Type O Negative Blood.   That shyt works for everybody.  

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 4:02 pm

Try to educate yourself and try providing something that shows Russia is ranked under the number 11. We know, it's a "tranny" report.  Yet your report is nothing but your **** opinion. 

Russia’s economy isn’t surging—it’s surviving. It’s not leading the global pack—it’s limping behind the Asian tigers and barely outpacing the EU’s slow lane. And calling Western sources “trans” doesn’t change the math—it just makes the cope louder.

Russia vs European Economy: Nominal & PPP GDP In 2025 - Brilliant Maps

Actually, calling them trans makes their math suspect, you **** idiot.    

I swear, boy, you would drink piss water and call it Fiji. 
 
 

MR-7 » 06 Oct 2025, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 4:41 pm

How's that PPP working out for you that I posted with a link? 

Thanks for asking. 

11th in the world after a decade of sanctions, having its sovereign wealth stolen, having its trading partners harrassed, having its infrastructure blown up, being kicked out of swift, having its ships outlawed, and having its accounts frozen is pretty **** good. 

Then there's PPP:

AI Overview

Russia's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is projected to be $7.19 trillion in 2025, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other sources like Wikipedia. This figure is significantly higher than its nominal GDP, as PPP adjusts for differences in price levels between countries, resulting in a larger value for the Russian economy. 

With PPP taken into effect - which gives CONTEXT to the issue, - Russia is in a much stronger position. Globally, fourth place behind China, US, and India. The US has more than twice as many people as Russia. Russia has less people than Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Brazil, and Bangladesh. Russia has the fourth largerst economy with the 9th largest population. AND they have nukes, fool. That's trump on this planet. So is a missile inventory that can **** on the patriots 94% of the time.

If you had ANY understanding of history, you would be aware that Russia has always been an economic joke - each and every time it beat the west. Napoleon was MURDERING Russia - economically. So was Germany. And Germans ended up speaking Russian for a couple of generations. Not good to poke ze bear. 

Then there's the fact that the issue in Coupkraine is EXISTENTIAL for the Russians - like the cuban missile crisis was to the Unitded States. All the gee-gawing and getting your *** fingered in the WORLD is never going to change that fact. Your stupidity is no match for that reality, son. Idiots giggle while the bear gets poked. Later, it isn't so funny.

Let's agree on this much: Before the orange fool waddles us into a war with Russia, we should FIRST "crack the code" that lets usget back to only letting 66% of Russia's missiles defeat our crown jewel, marquee missile defense system,instead of the current 94%. Can we agree on THAT much?

Not fer nuthin, but to rub yer nose in it? Under PPP, the US is number 2.

NUMBER TWO!

That's a phrase that means poop. 

 
 

Cannonpointer » 06 Oct 2025, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Oct 2025, 6:01 pm

Actually, calling them trans makes their math suspect, you **** idiot.

I swear, boy, you would drink piss water and callit Fiji.

music.youtube /watch?v=rEkBEMq2dQI&si=oOxZt5qOFnxpAZEq