VanityFair.Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Bombs Away: Trump Has the I.Q. of an Inbred Tanning Bed, Says a Liberated Gary Cohn
The former White House adviser was “astounded” by the depths of the president’s stupidity, according to Bob Woodward’s new book.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/09 ... -gary-cohn
Name three "legitimate" sources.SouthernFried » 03 Nov 2025, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ VanityFair.You may as well claim that a grocery store checkout tabloid magazine is a legitimate source.
No, ***. I know I'm not. Which is exactly why you get zero effort from me.Blackvegetable » 03 Nov 2025, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Name three "legitimate" sources.
Do you think YOU are gonna convince ME?
Cower, Cracker...SouthernFried » 03 Nov 2025, 11:04 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ***. I know I'm not. Which is exactly why you get zero effort from me.
Only a true moron comes in here using "Vanity Fair" as a source to toss around. Look at the author of the article. Bess Levin. A small-hat. Color me shocked.
Isn’t that a clothing magazine?Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑ Cower, Cracker...
WTF do you know about Vanity Fair OR Bess Levin?
You don't even read.
And what do VF and Bess have to do with the photo?
Not a **** thing..
Now post your list, Slizz...
Look!Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑ Cower, Cracker...
WTF do you know about Vanity Fair OR Bess Levin?
You don't even read.
And what do VF and Bess have to do with the photo?
Not a **** thing..
Now post your list, Slizz...
rippy 38 avatar rippy 38 -1 Today, 6:12 am
Aren't you an idiot?
VF is essentially a **** celebrity tabloid magazine you clown-*** ****. Again, this is the type of trash you see at the grocery store checkout line. Why not grab Sports Illustrated's take on politics while you're at it? Then claim it's a legitimate source.Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 5:04 am » wrote: ↑ Cower, Cracker...
WTF do you know about Vanity Fair OR Bess Levin?
You don't even read.
And what do VF and Bess have to do with the photo?
Not a **** thing..
Now post your list, Slizz...
Don't presume to categorize something you've never read.SouthernFried » 04 Nov 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ VF is essentially a **** celebrity tabloid magazine you clown-*** ****. Again, this is the type of trash you see at the grocery store checkout line. Why not grab Sports Illustrated's take on politics while you're at it? Then claim it's a legitimate source.
Nothing at all like it.Again, this is the type of trash you see at the grocery store checkout line
That’s what I thought…….strange
You KEEP posting small-hat sources. Look at that one. Andrea Bernstein. How can you be so **** oblivious to not notice the pattern of the **** you continue to post?Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ Don't presume to categorize something you've never read.
Nothing at all like it.
But, since you mention it
https://www.npr.org/2024/04/26/12473520 ... vid-pecker
Former tabloid publisher details actions on behalf of Trump ahead of 2016 election
NEW YORK — The former publisher of the National Enquirer told prosecutors in New York that he killed stories that potentially could have hurt Donald Trump during the former president's run for the White House in 2016.
David Pecker, the tabloid's former publisher, detailed how Keith Davidson, an information broker, came forward in June 2016 with the story of Karen McDougal, a playboy model, who said she'd had an affair with Trump. The Enquirer was inclined to believe her, Pecker said, and sent a top editor to speak to McDougal.
you're a **** idiot
SouthernFried » 04 Nov 2025, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You KEEP posting small-hat sources. Look at that one. Andrea Bernstein. How can you be so **** oblivious to not notice the pattern of the **** you continue to post?
until your bbs descend and you have the T to list your sources, stop presuming to categorize mine, Nancy.small-hat sources
when you learn anything worth sharing, get back to me.How can you be so **** oblivious to not notice the pattern
Presuming to categorize your sources? Hell, the last two you have dropped on me were both articles written by small-hats. It's pretty **** obvious to see.Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ until your bbs descend and you have the T to list your sources, stop presuming to categorize mine, Nancy.
when you learn anything worth sharing, get back to me.
They read...and can write.SouthernFried » 04 Nov 2025, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Presuming to categorize your sources? Hell, the last two you have dropped on me were both articles written by small-hats. It's pretty **** obvious to see.
It's nice, too, if the candidate does not have a sordid history that includes sucking willie brown's dick for committee appointments.MR-7 » 03 Oct 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ The thing about being a qualified candidate for president of the United States is being able to speak extemporaneously about a multitude of subjects.
It tracks with your history that you would have the inside scoop on the National Enquirer.Blackvegetable » 04 Nov 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ Don't presume to categorize something you've never read.
Nothing at all like it.
But, since you mention it
https://www.npr.org/2024/04/26/12473520 ... vid-pecker
Former tabloid publisher details actions on behalf of Trump ahead of 2016 election
NEW YORK — The former publisher of the National Enquirer told prosecutors in New York that he killed stories that potentially could have hurt Donald Trump during the former president's run for the White House in 2016.
David Pecker, the tabloid's former publisher, detailed how Keith Davidson, an information broker, came forward in June 2016 with the story of Karen McDougal, a playboy model, who said she'd had an affair with Trump. The Enquirer was inclined to believe her, Pecker said, and sent a top editor to speak to McDougal.
you're a **** idiot
SouthernFried » 04 Nov 2025, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Presuming to categorize your sources? Hell, the last two you have dropped on me were both articles written by small-hats. It's pretty **** obvious to see.