Liberal Forum

Vegas » 08 Oct 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2025, 10:15 am

Translation: I just exposed your hypocrisy...again. Owned your ***.

Blackvegetable » 08 Oct 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2025, 10:19 am

Whose "hypocrisy"?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Mrkelly » 08 Oct 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2025, 9:01 am

 
ask your mom to explain how “TACO” refers to tRump

Vegas » 08 Oct 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2025, 10:27 am

Take a **** guess. 

God you are so **** stupid. And **** your questions. You refuse to answer mine, so **** yours.

Blackvegetable » 08 Oct 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2025, 11:05 am

As I explained earlier.....this is why you didn't dare leave your house last week...

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 08 Oct 2025, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2025, 11:06 am

Translation: I owned you. You are my little bitch.

Blackvegetable » 08 Oct 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

08 Oct 2025, 11:07 am

Take the H.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...