Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 11 Oct 2025, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 6:04 am

Except mine are real.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 11 Oct 2025, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2025, 6:03 am

Dull, duller, Rog62...

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 10 Oct 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

10 Oct 2025, 8:23 am

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-unear ... -10-years/
The video, released Wednesday evening, was shot at Trump Tower. 

In the clip, Trump asks one of the girls if she’s “going up the escalator.” When the girl replies, “yeah,” Trump turns to the camera and says: “I am going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?”

Blackvegetable » 10 Oct 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

10 Oct 2025, 9:20 am

It is not the first time Trump has made reference to his interest in dating much younger women.  In 2006, he made a similar comment about his own daughter, Ivanka Trump: “I’ve said that if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her,” Trump said.





Ibid.

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2021, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2021, 6:40 pm

Preternaturally pretty....

On a scale from 1-10, her shape is a 14..

Legs that will make you weep...not a dimple or even a shimmer...

Benches 145..

Sweet beyond belief



Can't be more than 24


Kill me....please



 

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2025, 10:34 am

I wonder what "dating" is in "locker room talk"....

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2025, 10:34 am

I wonder what "dating" is in "locker room talk"....

Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2025, 10:34 am

I wonder what "dating" is in "locker room talk"....

Blackvegetable » 13 Oct 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2025, 1:12 pm

Probably something along the lines of

"When that grows fuzz, I'm gonna get me some stinkfinger."

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 13 Oct 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2025, 1:13 pm

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Deal:

JohnnyYou » 13 Oct 2025, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2025, 5:31 pm

BurritoLater The Mexican Time Machine

Don't go for any cruises in the Carribean in boats under 30 ft hull length