Liberal Forum

the epstein files will be released.
--------------------------------------

• In September 2025, Senate Republicans blocked an amendment proposed by Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to force the release of Epstein files. Only Republican Senators Rand Paul and Josh Hawley voted with Democrats in favor of releasing the records.

jerrab » 14 Oct 2025, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:23 pm

the epstein files will be released.
--------------------------------------

• In September 2025, Senate Republicans blocked an amendment proposed by Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to force the release of Epstein files. Only Republican Senators Rand Paul and Josh Hawley voted with Democrats in favor of releasing the records.

https://19thnews.org/2025/10/epstein-fi ... earing-in/


Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva of Arizona, who won her election two weeks ago, would be the final signature needed to pass a resolution directing the Justice Department to release documents on Epstein.
 

Shine.. The Sun on the evil elite oligarchical authoratarinaistic totalitarian sex cabal and thier child sex toy amusement park

Heaven Let the Light Shun Down.

youtu.be/_m0bI82Rz_k?si=xRTiNixFO7XK_U56

jerrab » 14 Oct 2025, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:26 pm

https://19thnews.org/2025/10/epstein-fi ... earing-in/

Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva of Arizona, who won her election two weeks ago, would be the final signature needed to pass a resolution directing the Justice Department to release documents on Epstein.

https://subscriber.politicopro.com/arti ... n-00594309
House absence will delay Adelita Grijalva’s swearing-inThe chamber is no longer scheduled to return to Washington this week.
 

jerrab » 14 Oct 2025, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:23 pm

the epstein files will be released.
--------------------------------------

• In September 2025, Senate Republicans blocked an amendment proposed by Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to force the release of Epstein files. Only Republican Senators Rand Paul and Josh Hawley voted with Democrats in favor of releasing the records.

Ahhh Man..

jerrab » 14 Oct 2025, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:23 pm

the epstein files will be released.
--------------------------------------

• In September 2025, Senate Republicans blocked an amendment proposed by Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to force the release of Epstein files. Only Republican Senators Rand Paul and Josh Hawley voted with Democrats in favor of releasing the records.

Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files? 
 

Fake outrage.....get some today

nefarious101 » 14 Oct 2025, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:34 pm

Fake outrage.....get some today

Do you yell at your wife's girlfriend to bang the dildo harder?

Honestly, being in a relationship with you must be up there with Satanism
 
 
 

JohnnyYou » 14 Oct 2025, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:30 pm

Ahhh Man..

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 439899007/

PhiloBeddo » 14 Oct 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:32 pm

Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001/dl?inline

https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/in- ... gressional

PhiloBeddo » 14 Oct 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:32 pm

Why didn't Biden release the Epstein files?

 

• ews

Epstein files take center stage in FBI director Kash Patel's congressional testimony
[email]?subject=Epstein%20files%20take%20center%20stage%20in%20FBI%20director%20Kash%20Patel%27s%20congressional%20testimony&body=https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/in- ... gressional[/email]September 17, 2025
•

USA TODAY"You are hiding the Epstein files," a steamed Democratic congressman told FBI Director Kash Patel in a routine oversight hearing that periodically devolved into raised-voice bickering and partisan gamesmanship. "You are part of the cover-up."Rep. Daniel Goldman, from New York, was one of several Democrats who pressed Patel on why President Donald Trump's administration has not released more files related to the sex trafficking investigation into the late financier Jeffrey Epstein.Forcing the Department of Justice to release Epstein documents has put some MAGA Republicans, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene ‒ a firebrand from Georgia who has pledged to read the names of Epstein's alleged accomplices if they are released ‒ on the same side as mainstream Democrats.On Sept. 17, multiple Democratic lawmakers played an archived video of Patel advocating for the release of Epstein-related documents, whose release he placed at the feet of the head of the FBI. Now, as the chief of that agency, they pressed him for answers.

jerrab » 14 Oct 2025, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 5:05 pm

• ews

Epstein files take center stage in FBI director Kash Patel's congressional testimony
[email]?subject=Epstein%20files%20take%20center%20stage%20in%20FBI%20director%20Kash%20Patel%27s%20congressional%20testimony&body=https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/in- ... gressional[/email]September 17, 2025
•

USA TODAY"You are hiding the Epstein files," a steamed Democratic congressman told FBI Director Kash Patel in a routine oversight hearing that periodically devolved into raised-voice bickering and partisan gamesmanship. "You are part of the cover-up."Rep. Daniel Goldman, from New York, was one of several Democrats who pressed Patel on why President Donald Trump's administration has not released more files related to the sex trafficking investigation into the late financier Jeffrey Epstein.Forcing the Department of Justice to release Epstein documents has put some MAGA Republicans, such as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene ‒ a firebrand from Georgia who has pledged to read the names of Epstein's alleged accomplices if they are released ‒ on the same side as mainstream Democrats.On Sept. 17, multiple Democratic lawmakers played an archived video of Patel advocating for the release of Epstein-related documents, whose release he placed at the feet of the head of the FBI. Now, as the chief of that agency, they pressed him for answers.

"Any allegations that I’m the part of a cover-up to protect child sexual trafficking and victims of human trafficking and sexual crimes is patently and categorically false," Patel told the committee.'A real prosecutor'Patel repeatedly said that the Trump administration has released more than any previous administration, specifically pointing the finger at Democratic administrations under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. He also said that the administration has released everything it is legally allowed to release.But Goldman, a former federal prosecutor, pressed Patel to specify which information could not be released and which laws and court orders he was speaking of.On why the FBI hasn't released video evidence, Patel said: "The overwhelming majority of that video is pornographic material that was downloaded from the internet, and child sexual abuse material."Patel kept referencing a limited-scope investigation into Epstein in 2006, 2007 and 2008 ‒ years that Republican George W. Bush was president ‒ but did not appear to reference any investigative material that led to Epstein's arrest in 2019.Then Goldman asked Patel why he specifically hasn't released federal interview reports with people who participated in the Epstein investigation."We are releasing as much as legally allowed," Patel responded. "Sir, do you know how court orders work?"
 

jerrab » 14 Oct 2025, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 5:06 pm

"Any allegations that I’m the part of a cover-up to protect child sexual trafficking and victims of human trafficking and sexual crimes is patently and categorically false," Patel told the committee.'A real prosecutor'Patel repeatedly said that the Trump administration has released more than any previous administration, specifically pointing the finger at Democratic administrations under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. He also said that the administration has released everything it is legally allowed to release.But Goldman, a former federal prosecutor, pressed Patel to specify which information could not be released and which laws and court orders he was speaking of.On why the FBI hasn't released video evidence, Patel said: "The overwhelming majority of that video is pornographic material that was downloaded from the internet, and child sexual abuse material."Patel kept referencing a limited-scope investigation into Epstein in 2006, 2007 and 2008 ‒ years that Republican George W. Bush was president ‒ but did not appear to reference any investigative material that led to Epstein's arrest in 2019.Then Goldman asked Patel why he specifically hasn't released federal interview reports with people who participated in the Epstein investigation."We are releasing as much as legally allowed," Patel responded. "Sir, do you know how court orders work?"

"Actually, Mr. Patel, I was a prosecutor ‒ a real prosecutor ‒ for years," Goldman responded."Oh, so I was a fake one?" Patel responded.'Big boy pants'Rep. Jamie Raskin, a high-profile Democrat from Maryland, played a video of Patel appearing on far-right influencer Benny Johnson's show in 2023.When Johnson asks Patel why the Epstein list hasn't been released, Patel answers, "Simple, because of who’s on that list." He says in another clip, "Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are."In another 2023 appearance on Blaze Media, founded by conservative Glenn Beck, the host asks who has Epstein's black book, and then asks who specifically. "FBI," Patel says. He later adds, "That’s under direct control of the director of the FBI."Raskin asked Patel why he hasn't released the "black book" now that he's the director of the FBI."The Rolodex, which is what everyone collectively refers to as the black book, has been released," Patel answered.Raskin replied: "Oh no. You’re talking about what the journalists got five years ago. No, that’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about what you were talking about there ‒ the black book under the direct control of the FBI director."
 

JohnnyYou » 14 Oct 2025, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:30 pm

Ahhh Man..

maybe the republicans wrote a bill no democrat would vote for so there would be 


a permanent shutdown

jerrab » 14 Oct 2025, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 5:12 pm

maybe the republicans wrote a bill no democrat would vote for so there would be 

a permanent shutdown

It was discussed months ago MAGAc Mike's Congress would be the last.

Project 2025 hates the pesky Constitution.  Thank God it is unshreddable.

They might have it under the presure of the Mariani Trench.. But that bytch will reboot bad azz 2.0
 
 

JohnnyYou » 14 Oct 2025, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 4:40 pm

Do you yell at your wife's girlfriend to bang the dildo harder?

Honestly, being in a relationship with you must be up there with Satanism

I have and they both do....like I said I have a streak of sadism and I trained them that way

nefarious101 » 14 Oct 2025, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2025, 6:30 pm

I have and they both do....like I said I have a streak of sadism and I trained them that way

So are you bisexual? at the least you sound like you are ok with polygamy swinger.

JohnnyYou » 15 Oct 2025, 2:26 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2025, 2:26 am

So are you bisexual? at the least you sound like you are ok with polygamy swinger.

nope....I just influence the women in my life to conform to me....not force mind you....

they know what they want and will conform to what they want to get it

that's the difference between betas like you and alphas like me

you can't get what you want being you so you try to be anything but you

I on the other hand embrace what I am....I can get what I want just being me