nefarious101 » 15 Oct 2025, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Indians didn't believe in owning the land but we do.
maybe they should have believed in own it and they would still have it.
cowboy 01 ....Indians 00..........I'm a cowboy soooooooooooooo.....WINNING!!
You're reasoning is twisted like a.pretzel, you say the Palestinians were on the land first, same as the Indians, because we conquered the Indians, it was OK fhat we took their land but the Jews also conquered the Palestinians and it's a different story with you......not that I believe the Palestinians have any more claim than the Jews on who was where first.Vegas » 15 Oct 2025, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ The difference is that Israel didn't conquer that land. We did. Their land was handed to them with a nice bow on it. If they are going to steal land, then at least fight for it like we did.
You speak in false generalities......give me one specific Palestinian family that the Jews and America drove from their home.jerrab » 15 Oct 2025, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑ indians did not believe in land owning. that said the indians were treated unfairly and still are. they should get more help than they do and that does not include in taking anyones homes but giving more money to tribes.
what has happened in israel is a whole different ball of wax. israel evicted people with the help of america and when they struck back, israel played the victim card creating the mess that lasts until now and even after tomorrow.
some christians who don't really believe in Christ think it is okay to evict people off their land.
Gosh, nuthin, ya weak ***.
I might be mad at the PM who removed their protection - but then, I am not an idiot like you.RebelGator » 15 Oct 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ I think if my family were murdered at a Music Festival, I might be inclined to hate the bastards that did it.
You're on record requiring FAR few repetitions, ape.RebelGator » 15 Oct 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ You can repeat a lie 20,000 times, that doesn't mean I have to believe it.
The fact you recognize they needed protection invalidates your Palestinian love affair as just simple Jew Hate.Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2025, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I might be mad at the PM who removed their protection - but then, I am not an idiot like you.
Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2025, 7:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I might be mad at the PM who removed their protection - but then, I am not an idiot like you.
RebelGator » 15 Oct 2025, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ You're reasoning is twisted like a.pretzel, you say the Palestinians were on the land first, same as the Indians, because we conquered the Indians, it was OK fhat we took their land but the Jews also conquered the Palestinians and it's a different story with you......not that I believe the Palestinians have any more claim than the Jews on who was where first.
Because a queer says so? I think not, fruitcake.RebelGator » 15 Oct 2025, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact you recognize they needed protection invalidates your Palestinian love affair as just simple Jew Hate.

who said I'm a Christian?jerrab » 15 Oct 2025, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ spoken like a true fake christian.
when you die you will not feel like you are winning.

jerrab » 15 Oct 2025, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ what they believed in had no bearing on them getting slaughtered.

nefarious101 » 15 Oct 2025, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ who said I'm a Christian?
looks like your pretend narrative fell apart....again
and I am still WINNING!!.....every day all day 24/7/365
You can worship the ground I walk on.....ask and I might allow it....maybe
You sound like Black Vegetable.....i might start referring to you as Black Fruit if you don't stop.Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2025, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Because a queer says so? I think not, fruitcake.
They obviously needed protection, stupid ***. They're dead because it was removed when Bibi activated Hamas.
You're an idiot.
They didn't conquer it! That's the whole point. The Jews didn't conquer anything. They were given the land, then we gave them the military, and they used it to oppress Arabs who have sticks and rocks to throw. The Jews didn't do **** to earn anything. Nothing. Zip. Nada. Zilch.RebelGator » 15 Oct 2025, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ You're reasoning is twisted like a.pretzel, you say the Palestinians were on the land first, same as the Indians, because we conquered the Indians, it was OK fhat we took their land but the Jews also conquered the Palestinians and it's a different story with you......not that I believe the Palestinians have any more claim than the Jews on who was where first.
They suck Satan's dick.
You sound like a weak dick sucker. I might starting callingRebelGator » 15 Oct 2025, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑You sound like Black Vegetable.....i might start referring to you as Black Fruit if you don't stop.Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2025, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Because a queer says so? I think not, fruitcake.
They obviously needed protection, stupid ***. They're dead because it was removed when Bibi activated Hamas.
You're an idiot.
They were ther first to use terrorism - they taught that **** to the arabs.Vegas » 15 Oct 2025, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ They didn't conquer it! That's the whole point. The Jews didn't conquer anything. They were given the land, then we gave them the military, and they used it to oppress Arabs who have sticks and rocks to throw. The Jews didn't do **** to earn anything. Nothing. Zip. Nada. Zilch.
Cannonpointer » 15 Oct 2025, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ They were ther first to use terrorism - they taught that **** to the arabs.
Not one of their founders wasn't on Britain's wanted dead or alive list. Even the gal - that goldigger my rear broad.
They murdered civilians, including the british.