Liberal Forum

JohnnyYou » 18 Oct 2025, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 5:17 pm

I was in autorotaion

2025 Gyrocopter

You still are... without a tail rotor.

RebelGator » 19 Oct 2025, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 5:21 am

You still are... without a tail rotor.

Gyroscopes don't need a rotor to spin in a circle jerk fashion. they just rotate around one talking point. 5x5 is the idea of art and reality are the same thing which they are as both ignore the actual way evolving works in plain sight.

jerrab » 17 Oct 2025, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2025, 12:40 pm

and don't like trump because he wants to be above the law

like a king and that is why democracy was conceived by the founding fathers.

trump is the one  who hates democracy and america.

The "No King" protests are helping Trump.  Thanx     

Cannonpointer » 19 Oct 2025, 12:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 12:11 am

I am confident that you are 100% correct - as far as you go. 

But you would be even more correct - 200% or more - if you were honest enough to recognize that they are calling out one liar inservice of another. Most of thempush for pedophilia and gender confusion. They hate kings but love queens.

that is long gone. and without that trump has no case.

roadkill » 19 Oct 2025, 5:31 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 5:31 am

The "No King" protests are helping Trump.  Thanx   

only to his dumb supporters.

if the elections were held today he would lose and he knows that and that is why he ordered gerrymandering,

well...no kings was a flop....once lunch rolled around the paid protesters left and the whole thing went to ****

pay for a half a day....you only get a half a day

Protesters pics were taken and posted on the web machine for the DOJ as well as potential employers to use for various reasons to be be announce at a later date.

all in all it was a good day for MAGA

See ya’ll on 7/4/2026

jerrab » 19 Oct 2025, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 6:34 am

only to his dumb supporters.

if the elections were held today he would lose and he knows that and that is why he ordered gerrymandering,

This is yer lucky day...I got one bridge left for sale. Get while it's shiny jerrab.      

I really like seeing all the "Forlorn" threads and posts from our pedo=progressive LGBT demonocrat dickheads, morons and idiots.

so pitiful....sorrowful hopeless mewings that mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things

thank you for sharing your hopelessness and tears for us to watch and laugh about

you see......this is what a republic looks like

jerrab » 18 Oct 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 2:43 pm

and that is exactly what they are trying to stop before it is too late...... no kings

Well then why didn't you and these idiot leftist groups object when DEMOCRATS took away your primary vote and installed the DNC choice that you had no choice to be your nominee someone who NOBODY voted for?
Isn't THAT the actions a King would take?
So when did Trump EVER do anything as authoritarian as that, genius?

It seems to me that such totalitarian **** WAS stopped by the landslide election of Trump AND NOT by allowing the choice of your Democrat Party Kings to succeed!
Can you deny that?  So what the **** are you still SO pissed off at Trump for? 
 

jerrab » 18 Oct 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 2:40 pm

https://youtu.be/uyMSkseiiWU?si=kZ87mZPcwzvWNBc8

So, do you care to provide a single thing that you liberal idiots accomplished that will alter Trump's agenda in any way at all?

Just one will do!  And don't try to tell me that we Republicans are now aware of your insane hatred for him, because we've already acknowledged that since before Trump first became President!
 

Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 10:57 am

So, do you care to provide a single thing that you liberal idiots accomplished that will alter Trump's agenda in any way at all?

Just one will do!  And don't try to tell me that we Republicans are now aware of your insane hatred for him, because we've already acknowledged that since before Trump first became President!

Hopefully it will lead to his impeachment and removal from office when Dems take the house and senate next year. Maybe we can even "LOCK HIM UP!"

MAGA Republicans are going to lose their seats to saner people. If Republicans do win, I suspect they will be far less facist and more moderate than the MAGA hard cores.

Trump is under water in approval in all the swing states now.  People are waking up and raising their middle finger. So if popularity was on his agenda, that has already changed negatively.

If there is a 2026 election you are ****. If delaying the election is on his agenda, and it appears to be so, he is hunting for any reason to invoke the insurrection act and declare martial law,  than it is worth dieing trying to change it from my perspective. I will fight like no hell you have ever seen.  We got brains.

 
 

JohnnyYou » 19 Oct 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 11:42 am

Hopefully it will lead to his impeachment and removal from office when Dems take the house and senate next year.

MAGA Republicans are going to lose their seats to saner people. If Republicans do win, I suspect they will be far less facist and more moderate than the MAGA hard cores.

Trump is under water in approval in all the swing states now.  People are waking up and raising their middle finger. So if popularity was on his agenda, that has already changed negatively.

If there is a 2026 election you are ****. If delaying the election is on his agenda, and it appears to be so, he is hunting for any reason to invoke the insurrection act and declare martial law,  than it is worth dieing trying to change it from my perspective. I will fight like no hell you have ever seen.  We got brains.

oh boy!!!  More predictions of winning from the losers

roadkill » 19 Oct 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 9:42 am

This is yer lucky day...I got one bridge left for sale. Get while it's shiny jerrab.    

you bought 20 last week. all from brooklyn.

Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 10:53 am

Well then why didn't you and these idiot leftist groups object when DEMOCRATS took away your primary vote and installed the DNC choice that you had no choice to be your nominee someone who NOBODY voted for?
Isn't THAT the actions a King would take?
So when did Trump EVER do anything as authoritarian as that, genius?

It seems to me that such totalitarian **** WAS stopped by the landslide election of Trump AND NOT by allowing the choice of your Democrat Party Kings to succeed!
Can you deny that?  So what the **** are you still SO pissed off at Trump for?

• ----------------
•  
• Founding Fathers' Views: Historical evidence suggests the Founding Fathers would likely not have supported the notion of a former president being immune from prosecution for crimes committed in office. They believed in presidential accountability through impeachment and criminal prosecution after leaving office. The Constitution itself includes mechanisms like impeachment and subsequent criminal prosecution to ensure the President is not above the law.
• Trump's Argument: Trump has argued that he cannot be prosecuted for actions taken during his presidency. He suggests that the Constitution granted American presidents similar powers and immunities to the British king, a claim disputed by historical and legal experts.
• Supreme Court's Ruling: The Supreme Court recently ruled on Trump's immunity claim in Trump v. United States. The court concluded that a former president has absolute immunity for actions within their "exclusive sphere of constitutional authority" and presumptive immunity for other "official actions". The court's decision was seen by some, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent, as potentially creating a "law-free zone around the President," effectively placing them above the law and contrasting with the Founders' intention to avoid creating an "elected king".
• "No Kings Act": In response to the Supreme Court's decision, Senators introduced the "No Kings Act" to reaffirm that presidents and vice presidents are not immune from criminal prosecution for actions violating U.S. law. This proposed legislation seeks to restore the principle that no one, not even the President, is above the law. 

jerra » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 6:46 am

and don't like trump because he wants to be above the law

like a king and that is why democracy was conceived by the founding fathers.

trump is the one  who hates democracy and america.
 
 

 

The founding fathers did not concieve democracy. The Greeks in Athens did.  The founders conceived a representative republic based on the principles of democracy.

 

JohnnyYou » 19 Oct 2025, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 11:42 am

Hopefully it will lead to his impeachment and removal from office when Dems take the house and senate next year. Maybe we can even "LOCK HIM UP!"

MAGA Republicans are going to lose their seats to saner people. If Republicans do win, I suspect they will be far less facist and more moderate than the MAGA hard cores.

Trump is under water in approval in all the swing states now.  People are waking up and raising their middle finger. So if popularity was on his agenda, that has already changed negatively.

If there is a 2026 election you are ****. If delaying the election is on his agenda, and it appears to be so, he is hunting for any reason to invoke the insurrection act and declare martial law,  than it is worth dieing trying to change it from my perspective. I will fight like no hell you have ever seen.  We got brains.

Don't flatter yourself!  
Democrats HAVE NO BRAINS!
If they did, they wouldn't have permitted and helped to get Biden elected by their fraudulent and illegal actions and then failed to support him when the DNC forced him off the ballot taking away your right to vote!

Neither you nor I know how next year's midterms will go, but it sure looks like Republicans are picking up many previously Democrat seats as a result of the redistricting laws going into effect.  And no doubt, you'll be whining and screaming about THAT course of action very soon!  What Democrats WILL be facing is a party that HAS NOT shut down the government in order to give illegals free healthcare or fund far-left groups any longer, and which is led by a President who has already gotten peace deals in 7 ongoing wars and will shortly have the Russia/Ukraine war settled, likely long before that election, and probably earning him the Nobel Peace Prize that he should have won THIS year!  Do you doubt that Trump will provide huge tax rebate checks to Americans before then?  Or that the tax cuts he signed on to this year will help the economy boom once again?  Or that gas prices will remain low and even go lower once the Russian war stops, or now that Biden isn't indiscriminately killing over a hundred million chickens and forcing inflation higher?

I'm content to wait and see how high Trump's approval rating will climb when the campaign begins next year before I stop laughing at your worthless predictions and idiotic theories 13 months from now.  Who knows how many Trump haters will take their own lives and end it all as we already see how their insanity has driven them to extremes?  Maybe there will even be more like you who actually believe your "cause" is worth dying for and seek mental health for their obvious derangement, which is something YOU should seriously consider, as MAGA continues to dance with glee and laugh in your dumb face!
 

jerrab » 19 Oct 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 12:17 pm

• ----------------
•  
• Founding Fathers' Views: Historical evidence suggests the Founding Fathers would likely not have supported the notion of a former president being immune from prosecution for crimes committed in office. They believed in presidential accountability through impeachment and criminal prosecution after leaving office. The Constitution itself includes mechanisms like impeachment and subsequent criminal prosecution to ensure the President is not above the law.
• Trump's Argument: Trump has argued that he cannot be prosecuted for actions taken during his presidency. He suggests that the Constitution granted American presidents similar powers and immunities to the British king, a claim disputed by historical and legal experts.
• Supreme Court's Ruling: The Supreme Court recently ruled on Trump's immunity claim in Trump v. United States. The court concluded that a former president has absolute immunity for actions within their "exclusive sphere of constitutional authority" and presumptive immunity for other "official actions". The court's decision was seen by some, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent, as potentially creating a "law-free zone around the President," effectively placing them above the law and contrasting with the Founders' intention to avoid creating an "elected king".
• "No Kings Act": In response to the Supreme Court's decision, Senators introduced the "No Kings Act" to reaffirm that presidents and vice presidents are not immune from criminal prosecution for actions violating U.S. law. This proposed legislation seeks to restore the principle that no one, not even the President, is above the law. 

(Yawn!)    
 

jerrab » 19 Oct 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 12:14 pm

you bought 20 last week. all from brooklyn.

I bought them cause they were all broken...I used them for parts.      

JohnnyYou » 18 Oct 2025, 4:29 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 4:29 am

I am going to a local protest Jerra.  There were three in my neighborhood.  I am going to the blue town in the Eastern Shore Sea of Red Hats.  That have been taken off and shelved (maybe burned in some cases) .   The hats are off, the flags are down, there is a crapload of buyer's remorse in this town.

Would you care to tell us exactly what it is that you hope to accomplish?
It surely isn't anything even the left-wing media noticed today, a day later, when it was barely mentioned in the morning news.

Can you say it was a huge waste of time that did nothing for your phony cause?  Or do you think you won something despite the fact that the US has never had a king nor can we ever have one in this country without tearing up the Constitution and having a new one written.

Or weren't you aware of that?