Liberal Forum

Vegas » 21 Oct 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:26 am

       Here is yopur PG thread that you banned me from. You still can't figure out how I do it.             

JohnnyYou » 21 Oct 2025, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 5:44 am

Nitrous can take em out in Euphoria..  Christians don't want that involved with Capital Punishment.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:27 am

What is it that you think you're doing?

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 21 Oct 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:30 am

Speaking of you evading and how the rules don't apply to you. Watch how you evade this question that I asked 5 months ago: 
1. Your rule will continue to not apply to you. 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Deal:

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:32 am

I've been waiting just short of 3 years.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 21 Oct 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:33 am

I have been waiting since 2017. 

1. You will now dig through my profile that won't go past the big purge. Cherry pick as always.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:35 am

Prove it.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 21 Oct 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:36 am

Prove what?

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:38 am

A question...

What a **** idiot.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Cannonpointer » 20 Oct 2025, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 8:47 pm

Six million did not perish. That number was made up LONG after the war. 

And not in a vacuum. The number 6 million carries some significance to zionists - I know not what. But I DO know that they have floated that number in previous claims of victimhood. 

If the search funtion worked, I could show you the newspaper accounts where world jewry was shrieking about six million jews being in peril of starvation, demanding the world rescue them. It was shortly before or after WWI, if memory serves. 

In any case, if six million jews had been disappeared from Europe, they'd need to have been imported. And there'd have been no survivors. 

Is it GENUINELY your position that the Germans tried and failed to exterminate prisoners? You do understand they killed far more Russians, and the Russians were NOT helpless prisoners. They were armed and shooting back. Do you really think the Germans were too incompetent to off the jews? Is that really your belief? That the Germans TRIED to kill all the jews, but just couldn't manage it?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 21 Oct 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 9:41 am

Speaking of you evading questions:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Deal:

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:03 am

November, 2022.

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 21 Oct 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:04 am

Just as I predicted. 

So **** gd stupid.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:17 am

Just post the rule.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 21 Oct 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:19 am

There is no rule. Why would I post a rule about you demoralizing yourself? Go for it.

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:22 am

A) I've answered it

B) You don't know a **** thing about it

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Cannonpointer » 20 Oct 2025, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 8:47 pm

And not in a vacuum. The number 6 million carries some significance to zionists - I know not what. But I DO know that they have floated that number in previous claims of victimhood. 

If the search funtion worked, I could show you the newspaper accounts where world jewry was shrieking about six million jews being in peril of starvation, demanding the world rescue them. It was shortly before or after WWI, if memory serves. 

In any case, if six million jews had been disappeared from Europe, they'd need to have been imported. And there'd have been no survivors.

Please seat yourself.



I like the very things you hate.

ROG62 » 20 Oct 2025, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 11:25 pm

I'm arguing the fact of the narrative that the Jews that perished died at the end of the war from starvation...while the numbers are debatable, you're not going to mass exterminate in the last few weeks while running...

ROG62 » 20 Oct 2025, 11:25 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 11:25 pm

 I've been to Buchenwald...sobering at best...rail lines, ovens, elevators conveyors with hooks..mass boneyard...

it appeared they managed well...

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2025, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 7:36 pm

There was no mass extermination. The winners wrote a dishonest history. There were no death camps - only work camps.

You fell for happy horse **** served up to rubes. If you'd had a mortician anywhere near you, you'd have heard giggling when they tried to pretend those ovens were processing thousands of corpses a month.

Let's be real. We both know you're dumb, easily duped. I mean, you listen to fox news and believe the **** they say. You're basically retarded.

If you were even HALFWAY smart, you would never have used the ear-witness testimony of a dummy.

DeezerShoove » 21 Oct 2025, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 4:44 pm

I remember you posting that article.
6 million is a multiple-use number.

Here's one I found. I didn't look too hard either. Probably more out there.
Lower left corner...