Liberal Forum

It was always unconstitutional. No more D.E.I, Juneteenth, Kwanza, quotas, black colleges.

Supreme Court ruling clears path for 'one-party system'
(Full article at above link)

The Supreme Court is set to hear Louisiana v. Callais for a second time in 2025, a case that could gut the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 and alter the balance of political power in America into a “one-party system.” At issue is whether Section 2 of the act — which prohibits racial discrimination in voting — violates the Constitution by allowing race to be considered in redistricting.
If the conservative supermajority strikes down Section 2 or weakens it significantly, experts warn it would devastate minority political power, especially among Black voters, and cement Republican control of Congress. “This is opening a whole new front from Republicans’ point of view, where they can dilute Black political power and achieve an unbelievable power grab,” said Lauren Groh-Wargo, CEO of Fair Fight Action, a liberal voting rights group. “Doing so would ‘clear the path for a one-party system where power serves the powerful and silences the people,” Black Voters Matter Fund co-founder LaTosha Brown said in a statement.
The case arose after Louisiana’s legislature was ordered by a lower court to draw a second Black-majority district to comply with the Voting Rights Act. A group of white residents sued, claiming the change discriminated against them. The Supreme Court’s reargument centers on whether Section 2 itself is unconstitutional under the 14th and 15th Amendments. Louisiana has since reversed its stance — once supporting the Black voters’ claim but now arguing that Section 2 should be struck down. In a surprising shift, the Department of Justice also joined the case, taking a position against the act for the first time in history.

Gang of Five azzholes sold the Constitution to the Devil for a Five Dollar Foot Long that is only 3 inches.

Can we please get a National Federal Election System, abolish the Electoral College, and have rank choice voting for multi parties?  Israel has it, Bibi still rigged it.
 
While we are at it.. Can we please start electing SCOTUS Judges for a single 18 year term?. Nine total, one every two years takes a seat. Elected by the people. The accountability of SCOTUS to changes in society and to  the American people is lacking under the current shyt.

Military Reboot:  Fire The President, The House, The Senate, and SCOTUS and start this bytch over.
 

Punch » 24 Oct 2025, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 2:44 am

It was always unconstitutional. No more D.E.I, Juneteenth, Kwanza, quotas, black colleges.

no spam
(Full article at above link)

The Supreme Court is set to hear Louisiana v. Callais for a second time in 2025, a case that could gut the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 and alter the balance of political power in America into a “one-party system.” At issue is whether Section 2 of the act — which prohibits racial discrimination in voting — violates the Constitution by allowing race to be considered in redistricting.
If the conservative supermajority strikes down Section 2 or weakens it significantly, experts warn it would devastate minority political power, especially among Black voters, and cement Republican control of Congress. “This is opening a whole new front from Republicans’ point of view, where they can dilute Black political power and achieve an unbelievable power grab,” said Lauren Groh-Wargo, CEO of Fair Fight Action, a liberal voting rights group. “Doing so would ‘clear the path for a one-party system where power serves the powerful and silences the people,” Black Voters Matter Fund co-founder LaTosha Brown said in a statement.
The case arose after Louisiana’s legislature was ordered by a lower court to draw a second Black-majority district to comply with the Voting Rights Act. A group of white residents sued, claiming the change discriminated against them. The Supreme Court’s reargument centers on whether Section 2 itself is unconstitutional under the 14th and 15th Amendments. Louisiana has since reversed its stance — once supporting the Black voters’ claim but now arguing that Section 2 should be struck down. In a surprising shift, the Department of Justice also joined the case, taking a position against the act for the first time in history.

What do you say to a blond with no arms or legs @Punch  ?

The Line:  "Nice Tits!"

Punch » 24 Oct 2025, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 2:44 am

It was always unconstitutional. No more D.E.I, Juneteenth, Kwanza, quotas, black colleges.

Supreme Court ruling clears path for 'one-party system'
(Full article at above link)

The Supreme Court is set to hear Louisiana v. Callais for a second time in 2025, a case that could gut the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 and alter the balance of political power in America into a “one-party system.” At issue is whether Section 2 of the act — which prohibits racial discrimination in voting — violates the Constitution by allowing race to be considered in redistricting.
If the conservative supermajority strikes down Section 2 or weakens it significantly, experts warn it would devastate minority political power, especially among Black voters, and cement Republican control of Congress. “This is opening a whole new front from Republicans’ point of view, where they can dilute Black political power and achieve an unbelievable power grab,” said Lauren Groh-Wargo, CEO of Fair Fight Action, a liberal voting rights group. “Doing so would ‘clear the path for a one-party system where power serves the powerful and silences the people,” Black Voters Matter Fund co-founder LaTosha Brown said in a statement.
The case arose after Louisiana’s legislature was ordered by a lower court to draw a second Black-majority district to comply with the Voting Rights Act. A group of white residents sued, claiming the change discriminated against them. The Supreme Court’s reargument centers on whether Section 2 itself is unconstitutional under the 14th and 15th Amendments. Louisiana has since reversed its stance — once supporting the Black voters’ claim but now arguing that Section 2 should be struck down. In a surprising shift, the Department of Justice also joined the case, taking a position against the act for the first time in history.

 

So then....

who are the WINNERS?  

who are the losers?  


Personally I see it as a win for America...all of us!

It would provide true constitutional equality and representation

People are tired of the pedo=progressive LGBT democrat "splaining" of what the constitution supposed mean and not what it actually says

We tried it their way for decades...way longer than we should have based on failure  and lack of GOOD results

based on this....we now know who the losers are....


 

Holy **** batman!!

You mean that BLACK SKIN no longer gets a total PASS for demanding their OWN RACIALLY DEFINED DISTRICTS?? Something that if WHITE PEOPLE DID, they would scream "RACISM" at the highest peak.

And the Asst AG made a MASSIVE BITCH SLAP of Sotomayor in the arguments. Or perhaps it was KJB. Either way, ONE of them played "Devils advocate" and got shot down massively in an EMBARRASSING futile attempt to sound all "juidgy" or something.
 

Punch » 24 Oct 2025, 2:44 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 2:44 am

It was always unconstitutional. No more D.E.I, Juneteenth, Kwanza, quotas, black colleges.

Supreme Court ruling clears path for 'one-party system'
(Full article at above link)

The Supreme Court is set to hear Louisiana v. Callais for a second time in 2025, a case that could gut the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 and alter the balance of political power in America into a “one-party system.” At issue is whether Section 2 of the act — which prohibits racial discrimination in voting — violates the Constitution by allowing race to be considered in redistricting.
If the conservative supermajority strikes down Section 2 or weakens it significantly, experts warn it would devastate minority political power, especially among Black voters, and cement Republican control of Congress. “This is opening a whole new front from Republicans’ point of view, where they can dilute Black political power and achieve an unbelievable power grab,” said Lauren Groh-Wargo, CEO of Fair Fight Action, a liberal voting rights group. “Doing so would ‘clear the path for a one-party system where power serves the powerful and silences the people,” Black Voters Matter Fund co-founder LaTosha Brown said in a statement.
The case arose after Louisiana’s legislature was ordered by a lower court to draw a second Black-majority district to comply with the Voting Rights Act. A group of white residents sued, claiming the change discriminated against them. The Supreme Court’s reargument centers on whether Section 2 itself is unconstitutional under the 14th and 15th Amendments. Louisiana has since reversed its stance — once supporting the Black voters’ claim but now arguing that Section 2 should be struck down. In a surprising shift, the Department of Justice also joined the case, taking a position against the act for the first time in history.

The two party system is less and less relevant as time goes by.
It's only important to the politicos. Career **** that use it to game the system.
Ban party affiliation for 20 years. What could possibly go wrong?

DeezerShoove » 24 Oct 2025, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 8:03 am

The two party system is less and less relevant as time goes by.
It's only important to the politicos. Career **** that use it to game the system.
Ban party affiliation for 20 years. What could possibly go wrong?

truthat..
 

DeezerShoove » 24 Oct 2025, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 8:03 am

The two party system is less and less relevant as time goes by.
It's only important to the politicos. Career **** that use it to game the system.
Ban party affiliation for 20 years. What could possibly go wrong?

Party affiliations are a Constitutional Right. Do you want to be a FASCIST and infringe massively on those rights or fight to preserve them??

Hello look around open your eyes we already got the "Uni-Party"

Around election time the Big Corporations shower both side with cash almost equally the Idea being that no matter who wins they already bought their carve outs and ya wanna run agiain next term vote this or well fund a "Primary" Challenger drain your war-chest

The Issues and Ideology is just a "Front" to confuse the rest of the masses

End of the day follow the "Campaign Money and Donors thats who really pulls the "Puppet Strings" in any government

ROG62 » 24 Oct 2025, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 7:04 am

Why do you pay for Patriot Radio?

Blackvegetable » 24 Oct 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 9:55 am

Why do you pay for Patriot Radio?

Better question is WHO PAYS YOU to post stupid **** on this and other forums as well??

*Beekeeper » 24 Oct 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 12:21 pm

Better question is WHO PAYS YOU to post stupid **** on this and other forums as well??

BZZZZ Kill

youtu.be/db-yKF1a-oM?si=C4ZEPaWVEqFiEKOP

 

Blackvegetable » 24 Oct 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

24 Oct 2025, 9:55 am

Why do you pay for Patriot Radio?

I don't, brown
 

ROG62 » 25 Oct 2025, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 6:32 am

I don't, brown

Can you believe that someone STUPID enough to pay for the NY Slimes and the Washington Compost PROPAGANDA **** would ask you a dumbasa question like that??

*Beekeeper » 25 Oct 2025, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 7:06 am

Can you believe that someone STUPID enough to pay for the NY Slimes and the Washington Compost PROPAGANDA **** would ask you a dumbasa question like that??

it's only because he delusionally believes only his sources are good...