Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:11 am

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:21 am

I didn't think this would be necessary, but alas...

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  
 

roadkill » Today, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:41 am

Did he call Trump a Nazi too?         

Let's take a look at how hard up you guys were trying to beat Trump...

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/H3_MZBCAcbE

can you imagine listening to that for four years?

BuckNaked » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

can you imagine listening to that for four years?

Only if I wanted to lure in some feeding ducks. Won't be long and the northern mallards will be heading south.     

JohnnyYou » 25 Oct 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 7:39 am

The Cambodia in your Armenia seems to have moved to your brain...
 
Go poop in your Golden toilet.. You'll feel better. You might lose a few more brain cells, but hey, you are running short anyway.

Cambodia like next to Laous and Vietnam..

Armenia is Eastern Europe borders Azerbijan, Iran, Turkey" also a former "Soviet Republic"

Armenia counted on "Russian Military Support" 4 protection..

Iran is also not exactly For Azerbijan and Turkey had border and Trade Relations with Armenia..

Since Ukraine War Russia cut back "Military Assistance" 2 Armemia and Azerbijan took back the Nargano/Karabaugh..

Now Armenia is pivoting "West" in hopes securing Millitary and Weapons

TwoIfByTea » 25 Oct 2025, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 6:07 pm

Cambodia like next to Laous and Vietnam..

Armenia is Eastern Europe borders Azerbijan, Iran, Turkey" also a former "Soviet Republic"

Armenia counted on "Russian Military Support" 4 protection..

Iran is also not exactly For Azerbijan and Turkey had border and Trade Relations with Armenia..

Since Ukraine War Russia cut back "Military Assistance" 2 Armemia and Azerbijan took back the Nargano/Karabaugh..

Now Armenia is pivoting "West" in hopes securing Millitary and Weapons

It sounds like you are catching on to the point of BV's OP.

Blackvegetable » 25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am

Another call out title hiding behind PG.  Yes, on numerous occasions Biden did say 5x.  And you never, not once, called him out for it.  

Trump obviously **** that one up but unlike Biden's multiple 5x comments it was not a lie designed to sway public opinion on a popular issue.

Only pussies PG comments on the topic that successfully dispute the Op.  and we all know you are a ******.
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am

Trump signs peace, trade deals ending conflict between Cambodia and Thailand — rips UN: ‘Didn’t get involved’

https://nypost.com/2025/10/26/us-news/t ... -involved/




Sniiffle….sniffle…but he said Armenia.  

ACTIONS speak louder than words ya stupid ****.
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am

 

What is the constant value of X multiplied 5 times? I suggest you consider ancestral lineages making up the current population of this species in this atmosphere so far.

Real easy to distinguish which is which in plain sight by their black, brown, yellow, red, white skin pigmentation that includes all hybrids each generation gap daily here.

they all arrive male or female displacements regardless what generation gap they socially achieved after birth in biological results changing population tomorrow's sons, daughters, cousins, parents, aunts, uncles, grandparents, great grandparents, great great grandparents.

Blackvegetable » 25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 6:11 am

 

Why is the title in quotation marks?
 

MR-7 » 26 Oct 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:25 am

Why is the title in quotation marks?
 

Because the author of the OP is a career devil's advocate to sustain reasonable doubt and organized chaos 24/7 so his charcter matters more than his natural time existing in plain sight equally alive since conception.


to everyone pretending their brain doesn't know why they exist uniquely alive since conception.

the actual answer to The rhetorical question asked by ruling elites regardless the reality defended daily here, "Who the hell died and left you in charge of building better tomorrows than living here daily so far?".

No body, just everyone choosing to believe life isn't self evident time existing one at a time now and anyone not complying isn't serving humanity daily here stand against everyone building better 7 days a week each heartbeat existing since birth.

Life as a species began with inception of original 16 great great grandparents and still exists because each great great grandchild repeated the genetic cycles living daily here as specific numbers currently alive.

Huey » 26 Oct 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 8:41 am

Another call out title hiding behind PG.  Yes, on numerous occasions Biden did say 5x.  And you never, not once, called him out for it.  

Trump obviously **** that one up but unlike Biden's multiple 5x comments it was not a lie designed to sway public opinion on a popular issue.

Only pussies PG comments on the topic that successfully dispute the Op.  and we all know you are a ******.

What is the 5x referring to?

Buck » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 7:40 am

Huey » 26 Oct 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 8:41 am

Another call out title hiding behind PG.  Yes, on numerous occasions Biden did say 5x.  And you never, not once, called him out for it.  

Trump obviously **** that one up but unlike Biden's multiple 5x comments it was not a lie designed to sway public opinion on a popular issue.

Only pussies PG comments on the topic that successfully dispute the Op.  and we all know you are a ******.

What is the 5x referring to?

On multiple occasion Biden said that the bullet from an AR-15 travels five times as fast as a bullet from any other gun.

https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house ... et/5029390

Despite multiple sources debunking that claim BV spun, lied and defended Biden over the comment instead of just saying he lied or was wrong.
 

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

On multiple occasion Biden said that the bullet from an AR-15 travels five times as fast as a bullet from any other gun.

https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house ... et/5029390

Despite multiple sources debunking that claim BV spun, lied and defended Biden over the comment instead of just saying he lied or was wrong.

@Buck Naked  ....just want to add that 

means 5th grade 5 years. This should help explain his irrational posts.
 
 
 

MR-7 » Today, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:47 am

@Buck Naked  ....just want to add that 

means 5th grade 5 years. This should help explain his irrational posts.

Lol