jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I am always right.
and suing romantic partners who lie about their birth gender should be allowable.
jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I am always right.
and suing romantic partners who lie about their birth gender should be allowable.

nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ if not fully disclosed upfront...life with no parole or the death penalty
the mental damage a freak like that could have on a normal human being could be irreversible even suicidal
I have no sympathy for that at all...put the freak down and put his/her head on a pike
it's under paragraph 2 of the FAFO manual....people really need to read it
jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ it would be awful to find the truth later. that is why birth gender should be on drivers licensesl

I never once said I was for gender changing on drivers licensesnefarious101 » 28 Oct 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ your side doesn't want that
you really can't say you're for it....vote against it....then say you're for it again
whoever you belong to needs help you understand what hypocrisy is
jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I never once said I was for gender changing on drivers licenses

Virtue signaling there’s that term againnefarious101 » 28 Oct 2025, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ never once did I ask
another hit and run attempt....
drive-by virtue signaling
that was really obvious
You just don't get it. This topic doesn't even exist without **** like you who continue to vote perverts amd immorals into power.jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I never once said I was for gender changing on drivers licenses

Who is they?nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ they try to appear as Christ like as they can
until they get triggered
they are now going to rip their mask off
major hissy fits....
a springboard for the planned food riots
and the Transvolution
nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2025, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ they try to appear as Christ like as they can
until they get triggered
they are now going to rip their mask off
major hissy fits....
a springboard for the planned food riots
and the Transvolution
Welp, trump ain't quartering troops, and strays don't have rights as an englishman.jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ -------------------------------------
Colonists defied the king's rules primarily because of a lack of representation in the British government, which led to what they called "taxation without representation". They also resisted restrictions on their self-governance, economic activities, and perceived violations of their rights as Englishmen, such as the quartering of British troops in their homes and the denial of trial by jury.
Your beef ain't with me, Holiday.jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/nations ... =111621798
----------------------Advocates for the new Constitution sought to assure state ratifying conventions that the new President would not be an elected king," the brief said.Holly Brewer, the Burke Professor of American History at the University of Maryland and the brief's main author, told ABC News that historical writings from key figures, including Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and others as well as the records from the states as they ratified the Constitution explicitly show they were against "another runaway monarchy" after suffering under Great Britain's King George III.MORE: What constitutes an 'official act' by a president?"It was remarkable. There were so many issues where the founders disagreed, but this was not one of them," she said.Brewer said the founders all looked at history in order to not repeat the same mistakes they thought had led to the absolute rule by king they opposed, holding to the concept that "no man is above the law.""The Framers came to the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 determined not to replicate the British monarchy they had defeated. They argued among themselves about the appropriate balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, and the specific powers attached to each. But at no point did they seek to endow the President with prerogatives that would make him an 'elective King,'" the brief said, citing James Madison's "Notes on the Constitutional Convention."Thomas Wolf, director of democracy initiatives at the Brennan Center who co-authored the brief, told ABC News that the anti-monarchal spirit among the founders was so strong that even those who pushed for a stronger executive branch, such as Hamilton, argued that a president could be prosecuted.

nefarious101 » 28 Oct 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ training is pretty rigorous
but in 20 minutes later you got your gender renderer license
and your official badge
Yes, the queers are everywhere.
99.99 per cent of the protests were by ordinary people with one thing in common,Cannonpointer » 28 Oct 2025, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, the queers are everywhere.
Which is kinda cool, because that means more people laughing their asses off.
It's the best medicine, ya-know...
Cannonpointer » 28 Oct 2025, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Your beef ain't with me, Holiday.
It's with the Soo-preem Court.
They over-ruled ya,
Nope.jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ 99.99 per cent of the protests were by ordinary people with one thing in common,
they hate trump.
Nobody on the left minds activist judges, kid. It got ya gay marriage, abortion mills, men in women's prisons - all your highest values.jerrab » 28 Oct 2025, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑ acttually it is with the judges who put trump over the constitution and the founding fathers who are the ones who made america great and gave freedom from kings.
Cannonpointer » 28 Oct 2025, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody on the left minds activist judges, kid. It got ya gay marriage, abortion mills, men in women's prisons - all your highest values.
You HAD to know that EVENTUALLY, the other side would learn from your example.