Liberal Forum

jerrab » 26 Oct 2025, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 8:21 am

go ahad and pretend no kings was all about abortion.

From the videos I've seen, I don't think any of them knew what exactly they were protesting....just "I hate Trump!"

they always have minders at the protests to keep protesters from talking to the press...

they don't want anyone finding out just how brainless and idiotic those moronic protesters are

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:14 am

From the videos I've seen, I don't think any of them knew what exactly they were protesting....just "I hate Trump!"

they always have minders at the protests to keep protesters from talking to the press...

they don't want anyone finding out just how brainless and idiotic those moronic protesters are

keep dreaming


////////////

//////////////Though the constitution is clear that we don’t have kings, and our government doesn’t include the position of king, I think many of us feel that Trump and his administration and the Republican Congress and the Right Wing Supreme Court are behaving as if he were a king. It is the authoritarian behavior that people are protesting.
 

Fuelman » 26 Oct 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 9:45 am

You mean like calling for all unvaccinated people to be killed?

I'm sorry you have to live life being a dumb ****!

You can't catch pregnant, Dope.

Blackvegetable » 26 Oct 2025, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 7:54 am

But you will make decisions for them, right?

You people are **** dung beetles..

No...... for the babies, simpleton .

jerrab » 26 Oct 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:21 am

keep dreaming

////////////

//////////////Though the constitution is clear that we don’t have kings, and our government doesn’t include the position of king, I think many of us feel that Trump and his administration and the Republican Congress and the Right Wing Supreme Court are behaving as if he were a king. It is the authoritarian behavior that people are protesting.

Trump walks into a restaurant and look what happens

or a stadium or a fieldhouse or anywhere else he goes

I know...But! But! But!....no buts...we deal in reality now 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN2VBwUPCaA

Blackvegetable » 26 Oct 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:23 am

You can't catch pregnant, Dope.

What's up, Der Führer?

You are the authoritarian who said the following:

You vill get zee vaccine or I vill shoot you.

You vill wear zee mask indoors and outdoors or I vill shoot or jail you.

You vill have sechs feet separation in or outdoors or I vill jail or shoot you.

You vill pay for Obamacare by having a policy with services you do not need.

Shall I go on, Adolph?  You are an authoritarian supporting POS.

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:29 am

Trump walks into a restaurant and look what happens

or a stadium or a fieldhouse or anywhere else he goes

I know...But! But! But!....no buts...we deal in reality now 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN2VBwUPCaA

big deal, the same thing for george clooney or paul mccartney.

jerra » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 7:39 am

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:29 am

Trump walks into a restaurant and look what happens

or a stadium or a fieldhouse or anywhere else he goes

I know...But! But! But!....no buts...we deal in reality now 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN2VBwUPCaA

big deal, the same thing for george clooney or paul mccartney.

 

No, not the same.  According to your ilk Trump is hated by hispanics, latinos, cubans, etc, because of his immigration policies.

As usual, you are wrong.  Now reframe and spin which is your MO.

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:14 am

From the videos I've seen, I don't think any of them knew what exactly they were protesting....just "I hate Trump!"

they always have minders at the protests to keep protesters from talking to the press...

they don't want anyone finding out just how brainless and idiotic those moronic protesters are

hmmmm, the signs said no kings. that should give you a hint.

---------------------------
The Supreme Court has recently agreed to hear cases related to immigration, presidential immunity, and administrative deference. For example, it upheld the Trump administration's ability to detain individuals for immigration checks, ruled that presidents have absolute immunity for official acts, and reversed the Chevron doctrine which requires courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous laws. 
 
 

jerra » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 7:40 am

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:14 am

From the videos I've seen, I don't think any of them knew what exactly they were protesting....just "I hate Trump!"

they always have minders at the protests to keep protesters from talking to the press...

they don't want anyone finding out just how brainless and idiotic those moronic protesters are

hmmmm, the signs said no kings. that should give you a hint.

---------------------------
The Supreme Court has recently agreed to hear cases related to immigration, presidential immunity, and administrative deference. For example, it upheld the Trump administration's ability to detain individuals for immigration checks, ruled that presidents have absolute immunity for official acts, and reversed the Chevron doctrine which requires courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous laws. 
 
 

 

Well, prior to the rally, there were no kings in the US  thanks to the framers.  After the rally there were no kings in the US thanks to the framers.  It was a rally about a problem that does not exst.

Jujst a bunch of old white people protesting an issue that does not exist.
 

jerrab » 26 Oct 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 9:49 am

you cant stand it that your dumb *** bondi's predictions of mass riots did not happen.

     

That's rich jerritol...I see it more like this...

SouthernFried » 25 Oct 2025, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Oct 2025, 8:16 pm

40-something year-old white women. Yeah, you're not winning some "revolution" with that.   

Guys like Johnny and BV.... they fall into the other category of these protestors.... the ***. 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/no-kings-pro ... ic-experts

Sounds like a meat market 
 

ROG62 » 26 Oct 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 11:12 am

That's rich jerritol...I see it more like this...

 

and bondi lied her *** off.

jerrab » 26 Oct 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:36 am

big deal, the same thing for george clooney or paul mccartney.

Good... you're finally realizing the fact that you lost

We won!

clooney and mccartney?....why bring them into it?

ohhhhhhh.....grabbing at straws....not a good look!

that's so 14th century

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 11:56 am

Good... you're finally realizing the fact that you lost

We won!

clooney and mccartney?....why bring them into it?

ohhhhhhh.....grabbing at straws....not a good look!

that's so 14th century

george clooney should run for president.



 

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 11:56 am

Good... you're finally realizing the fact that you lost

We won!

clooney and mccartney?....why bring them into it?

ohhhhhhh.....grabbing at straws....not a good look!

that's so 14th century

making the no kings rallies about abortion, that is grasping at straws.

nefarious101 » 26 Oct 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 11:56 am

Good... you're finally realizing the fact that you lost

We won!

clooney and mccartney?....why bring them into it?

ohhhhhhh.....grabbing at straws....not a good look!

that's so 14th century

showing that people go crazy when a famous person shows up.

jerrab » 26 Oct 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 10:36 am

big deal, the same thing for george clooney or paul mccartney.

this may have been from 2 years ago.


https://youtu.be/l2HEfJWPpyc?si=iDsJEFI84aIydyQ8

You can bet jerrab was there and felt right at home. You ain't seen nothin'...til your down on a muffin

Huey » 26 Oct 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

26 Oct 2025, 11:08 am

Well, prior to the rally, there were no kings in the US  thanks to the framers.  After the rally there were no kings in the US thanks to the framers.  It was a rally about a problem that does not exst.

Jujst a bunch of old white people protesting an issue that does not exist.

you really have a nerve to mention the framers, the framers are the ones trump is overturning.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trump's claim of presidential immunity:

• Founding Fathers' Views: Historical evidence suggests the Founding Fathers would likely not have supported the notion of a former president being immune from prosecution for crimes committed in office. They believed in presidential accountability through impeachment and criminal prosecution after leaving office. The Constitution itself includes mechanisms like impeachment and subsequent criminal prosecution to ensure the President is not above the law.
• Trump's Argument: Trump has argued that he cannot be prosecuted for actions taken during his presidency. -------------He suggests -----------that the Constitution granted American presidents similar powers and immunities to the British king,----------- a claim disputed by historical and legal experts.----------------------------------
• Supreme Court's Ruling: The Supreme Court recently ruled on Trump's immunity claim in Trump v. United States. The court concluded that a former president has absolute immunity for actions within their "exclusive sphere of constitutional authority" and presumptive immunity for other "official actions". The court's decision was seen by some, including Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent, as potentially creating a "law-free zone around the President," effectively placing them above the law and contrasting with the Founders' intention to avoid creating an "elected king".
• "No Kings Act": In response to the Supreme Court's decision, Senators introduced the "No Kings Act" to reaffirm that presidents and vice presidents are not immune from criminal prosecution for actions violating U.S. law. This proposed legislation seeks to restore the principle that no one, not even the President, is above the law. -----------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if people don't speak up today, tomorrow will be too late.