The evidence of your "smarts" being your blind faith in a grifter.RebelGator » 30 Oct 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ Looks like that left forearm got caught in a revolving door......to get thru a door, you have to be smarter than the door knob....apparently, you aren't.
Maybe you can post a pic of you, Roshambo, Johnny, and jerra b shirtless playing "Roshambo".Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ Of course, we COULD all post photos of ourselves shirtless...to see who among us still pumps enough T for muscle tone....and who belongs in mommy jeans.
Goldman Sacs?? Is that all you have??
What do you have?*Beekeeper » 30 Oct 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ Goldman Sacs?? Is that all you have??
And, once again, you STILL HAVE NOTHING!!
NY Slimes....![]()
![]()
Your concession is noted...MR-7 » 30 Oct 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe you can post a pic of you, Roshambo, Johnny, and jerra b shirtless playing "Roshambo".
Thanks

Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2025, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ The evidence of your "smarts" being your blind faith in a grifter.
Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2025, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ The evidence of your "smarts" being your blind faith in a grifter.
I’m assuming you are saying that tariffs raise prices which in turn if there is a sales tax in the state that makes the tax liability more for that purchase?Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Research pegs Trump tariffs as largest tax increase since 1993
The Trump administration’s tariff policies are poised to deliver the largest tax increase for US households in more than three decades, according to new estimates from the Tax Foundation.
With the full suite of tariffs now in effect or scheduled, the nonprofit estimates that the average American household faces an additional $1,300 in taxes this year and $2,000 in 2026 – costs that are already rippling through retail prices and consumer budgets.
The Tax Foundation’s analysis, published Monday, finds that the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and Section 232 authorities have pushed the average effective tariff rate to 11.4%. That’s the highest level since 1943, and a sharp jump from the 1.5% average applied just three years ago.
While the Trump administration has repeatedly denied that tariffs are taxes, the Tax Foundation asserted its tariffs “are the largest US tax increase as a percent of GDP (0.55 percent for 2025) since 1993, surpassing the tax increases enacted under President Barack Obama and President George H.W. Bush.”
https://www.investmentnews.com/equities ... 993/262768
So **** g'ddammned stupid....
don’t hold your breath*Beekeeper » 30 Oct 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ Grifter??
Your evidence to prove that **** claim of yours!!
Go!!
HA!!Blackvegetable » 30 Oct 2025, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ Let me be perfectly clear.
You are not very bright...
Given how little that is, you might be.ConservativeWave » 30 Oct 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ HA!!
THAT"S kinda like the POT, calling the KETTLE BLACK !!
I'm confident in what I KNOW... ARE YOU? REALLY?
dip$hit !!

Nuttin will happen to them. They are most likely back out on the streets!nefarious101 » 30 Oct 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ It the most wonderful time of the year
protested arrested, federal charges and going to jail
it's the most wonderful time of the year
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE3xAaCEx70
BuckNaked » 30 Oct 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ Nuttin will happen to them. They are most likely back out on the streets!

Only a far-left Trump-hating ignoramus like you would be unable to realize that Trump is one of the greatest builders of our time, and he knows far more about it than ANY potential architect that was previously on the board. I have little doubt that he's had to suffer the bureaucratic **** and stupidity that ANY Biden appointment would have had, and I guarantee that if he had left any of them on the board, they would have done nothing but try to stop Trump's plans.Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ President Trump on Tuesday fired all six sitting members of a board that oversees architecture in Washington, D.C., CBS News has confirmed, as the president plans a slate of major building projects in the capital city — including a massive White House ballroom.
"We are preparing to appoint a new slate of members to the commission that are more aligned with President Trump's America First Policies," a White House official told CBS News.
Trump fires board that oversees D.C. construction projects, as he plans major changes to White House - CBS News
https://share.google/XcGzKrKQrCwkJ0kJm
So **** g'ddammned stupid
Zeets2 » 30 Oct 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Only a far-left Trump-hating ignoramus like you would be unable to realize that Trump is one of the greatest builders of our time, and he knows far more about it than ANY potential architect that was previously on the board. I have little doubt that he's had to suffer the bureaucratic **** and stupidity that ANY Biden appointment would have had, and I guarantee that if he had left any of them on the board, they would have done nothing but try to stop Trump's plans.
So, you don't like it?
That's really all the proof I need to know that it was a great move by Trump, any we can expect you'll be whining about it for years, long after the grand ballroom and the other projects he has in mind have been completed.
Rumor has it that Trump is deciding between calling it either the Charlie Kirk Memorial Ballroom, or the Monica Lewinsky Ballroom!![]()
![]()
you're a **** idiot, Zeet.Only a far-left Trump-hating ignoramus like you would be unable to realize that Trump is one of the greatest builders of our time, and he knows far more about it than ANY potential architect that was previously on the board.
And YOU'RE the idiot who thinks that getting a huge, modern ballroom so that world leaders don't have to sit in a tent on the lawn of the White House is a bad idea, despite the fact that it's not costing taxpayers a cent, unlike Obama's basketball court.
Are you hiring?Zeets2 » 30 Oct 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ And YOU'RE the idiot who thinks that getting a huge, modern ballroom so that world leaders don't have to sit in a tent on the lawn of the White House is a bad idea, despite the fact that it's not costing taxpayers a cent, unlike Obama's basketball court.
Every business owner like myself has had to suffer the ignorance of having an occasional employee who thinks they know how to run the company better than the business owner or their boss. And you're exactly the type of buffoon that would be convinced that you could, despite never having the guts to create one yourself!