Americans Facing a Tough Job Market in 2025 Won’t Get a Break Next YearBlackvegetable » 06 Nov 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ US Firms Announce Most October Job Cuts in More Than Two Decades
Data from outplacement firm Challenger put a number on the anecdotal evidence of layoffs rippling through the economy.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... r-20-years
MAGA!
Yes it is!
Aside from a one-month pandemic plunge in April 2020, the U.S. hiring rate is scraping its lowest depths since 2013. Yet in the third quarter of 2025, more than 6 million Americans resumed looking for a job (technically, moved from “not in the labor force” status into unemployment). That’s a 9 percent increase from the prior quarter.Fuelman » 19 Dec 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ Yes it is!
Recent & Short-Term (2025)U.S. Nonfarm Productivity: Rose 3.3% (annualized) in Q2 2025, following a dip in Q1, indicating a rebound.Sector Growth: The Durable Goods sector showed high projected growth (3.33%), while the overall Services sector was projected around 1.22% for labor productivity.Chamber of Commerce: Expected productivity to drive >3% economic growth in 2025.
Why should we not discount anything with the word Minneapolis in it, Distance Runner?Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Aside from a one-month pandemic plunge in April 2020, the U.S. hiring rate is scraping its lowest depths since 2013. Yet in the third quarter of 2025, more than 6 million Americans resumed looking for a job (technically, moved from “not in the labor force” status into unemployment). That’s a 9 percent increase from the prior quarter.
As the labor market stagnates, something notable is happening: More Americans are getting back in the game (Figure 1)....
This “want a job now” statistic is at its highest level since 2021. Back then, the reading coincided with opportunity and optimism: The U.S. job market had the fastest hiring rate in more than 20 years, and wage pressures were building, especially for lower-paid jobs.
Today’s entrants are not tempted by a red-hot labor market. This time, many are searching again because they have to.1
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/ ... re-economy
You should run from it, as you do everything else.RebelGator » 19 Dec 2025, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Why should we not discount anything with the word Minneapolis in it, Distance Runner?
Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2025, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ Job Losses Mounted In October As Employers 'Struggled'—And Wall Street Projects Grim Job Market
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush ... ob-market/
"Define woman!"
So **** g'ddammned stupid
You do it.....FJB » 19 Dec 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ Keep posting false news.... you have yet to define the term woman.
↓Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Show me that math....Fuelman » 19 Dec 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ Of the 2.2 million jobs created in 2024, about 500k were federal and state workers.
That just doesn't math out for me.
I doubt America is that much different than the UK.Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ Show me that math....
Not talking the arithmetic...I'm talking the "analysis"
So it's more vibe than math.Fuelman » 19 Dec 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ I doubt America is that much different than the UK.
A new approach to improving government productivity | McKinsey https://share.google/pZQJc7p4vgeNYMKk3
A new approach to improving government productivity
aking government more productive offers substantial rewards for the public. A McKinsey study across 42 countries found that if public services could reach the productivity levels of the leading performers in their peer groups, the improvement would be worth an estimated $3.5 trillion per year.1 Since then, governments have spent more on public services, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.2 Allowing for this increase and inflation, the productivity gap could be well over $5 trillion per year in 2024. These additional resources could be redirected to further improve public services, invested to meet longer-term needs (for example, those of aging populations), or used to tackle intensifying fiscal challenges
Public sector productivity in the United Kingdom, as in many countries, has been declining since 1995. According to our research, between 1995 and 2008, public sector productivity decreased by an average of 0.1 percent per year. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the decline has accelerated to 0.9 percent per year. Overall, public sector productivity has decreased by about 20 percent since 1995. In contrast, private sector productivity in the United Kingdom has increased by 50 percent over the same period, and in the United States, it has increased by 150 percent. The public has noticed this disparity. In a survey conducted in November 2023, 78 percent of respondents stated that public services had deteriorated.5
We are all better off with plugs n jugs out of office!Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Americans Facing a Tough Job Market in 2025 Won’t Get a Break Next Year
This year was a difficult one for Americans looking for work. Forecasters don’t see much improvement in their prospects coming in 2026.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... e-americas
But you don't know anything...
Why would anyone but a moron believe it?BuckNaked » 19 Dec 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑ all I know is if you still support plugs n jugs four year **** show your commitment to stupidity is impressive
The "low-info, low engagement" slack jaws reeled in by Elon?BuckNaked » 19 Dec 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ a bunch of voters believe especially in all the swing states