On cold days, does your breath linger for hours and join with your neighbors' breath to become cloud cover?Roshambo » 11 Nov 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ The sole trace I have observed in the sky is left by an airplane, and I am convinced it is condensation.
It was worth running your cock cave about. But whether you are the type that runs his cock cave without regard for accuracy is not for me to say. That's your business.Fuelman » 11 Nov 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Of course I have Flat Earther. Not sure about this particular subject though.
Is it worth an hour of my valuable time?
Does it include the Jew Cabal?
As you know, we were neighbors in the aughts and teens for 9 years.Vegas » 11 Nov 2025, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ Just an observation. When the government shutdown happened, I didn't see many, if any at all, of these chemtrails. Probably a coincidence , I am certain.![]()
.
Cannonpointer » 11 Nov 2025, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ "Conspiracy theorist" is a term used by the MSM and their gay supporters to dodge addressing facts.

The following outlines the conditions necessary for the formation of contrails. It is evident that this phenomenon is contingent upon exceedingly low temperatures. At or below -40°C (-40°F), your breath will crystallize into ice particles as well.Cannonpointer » 11 Nov 2025, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑ On cold days, does your breath linger for hours and join with your neighbors' breath to become cloud cover?
Related inquiry - are you retarded?
Cannonpointer » 11 Nov 2025, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure.
They were chemtrailing.
I've seen this stunt before - using early military experiments to justify CIVILIAN PASSENGER JETS flying at 35,000 FEET leaving trails that clearly are not vaporas they do not dissolve behind the jet.
Either you were truly stupid to your environment your entire life before the late 90s, when chemtrailing began in earnest, OR you're lying in order to defend a world that doesn't scare you.
I have no way of knowing which - stupid or dishonest.And let's be realistic: it's likely a bit of both.
Cannonpointer » 11 Nov 2025, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑ THERE'S the little girl.
Addressing the argument, as usual.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You as well.
Cannonpointer » 11 Nov 2025, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑ As you know, we were neighbors in the aughts and teens for 9 years.
I observed that the powers that be paid Vegas special attention on the chemtrail front.
Edward Snowden would have found your fantasy to be true right?Cannonpointer » 11 Nov 2025, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑ It was worth running your cock cave about. But whether you are the type that runs his cock cave without regard for accuracy is not for me to say. That's your business.
I can tell you that when I am shown to be incorrect, time stands still until I refute it or acknowledge it in full.
Learn grammar, ***.nefarious101 » 11 Nov 2025, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑ so you using it twice in the last to replies tell us a story and I used it once
that makes you twice as much a progressive ***
you wanted to get that out there didn't you?
Queer, you can google up any talking points you like. Contrails disappear behind jets, predictably and mathematically.Roshambo » 12 Nov 2025, 4:30 am » wrote: ↑ The following outlines the conditions necessary for the formation of contrails. It is evident that this phenomenon is contingent upon exceedingly low temperatures. At or below -40°C (-40°F), your breath will crystallize into ice particles as well.
- Temperature: The ambient air temperature must be at or below -40°C (-40°F), which is a common condition at the cruising altitudes of jets (around 25,000 to 35,000 feet).
- Humidity: There must be enough moisture in the atmosphere for the ice crystals to form. If the upper atmosphere is very dry, contrails will be short-lived or not form at all.
- Aircraft exhaust: The exhaust from the aircraft provides the necessary water vapor and carbon particles for the ice crystals to form around.
THERE'S THE LITTLE GIRL!Beekeeper » 12 Nov 2025, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Psychiatrists call people who disseminate **** like this ^^^^...
"Weak minded and bordering on insane".
Yet it is you who is ad hom dependent, fruity pebbles.
How the **** would I know, and what the **** does that have to do with anything? Do you think Snowden had God-like access?Fuelman » 12 Nov 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ Edward Snowden would have found your fantasy to be true right?
Because a gay man spewed it on the internet, without a link?Fuelman » 12 Nov 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ Around the world, scientists have conducted investigations debunking
I grew up oil field trash. In the US, we were trash - in the third world, we were rich Americans, respected and admired.
Why are gay homosexual queers on the internet so keen to use a phrase their mental masters prepared for them and to disbelieve what they see in favor of what they are told, spew-bot?Fuelman » 12 Nov 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ So why are people on the internet so keen to believe in conspiracy theories?
AGAIN, fruity: Snowden and two dollars gets ya coffee at starbucks.Fuelman » 12 Nov 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ That’s a question Snowden does have the answer to. “Everybody wants to believe in conspiracy theories because it helps life make sense,” he said on the podcast. “It helps us believe that somebody is in control, that somebody is calling the shots.”
NO LINK means it NEVER HAPPENED!!Cannonpointer » 12 Nov 2025, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ THERE'S THE LITTLE GIRL!
Government agents openly admit under oath that they are chemtrailing, and dick sucker opts for the "You're crazy" boot lick.
Keep your mouth on the nanny state's dick, boy. It suyits your character.
Cannonpointer » 12 Nov 2025, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Queer, you can google up any talking points you like. Contrails disappear behind jets, predictably and mathematically.
Your ineducability doesn't put the onus on me. You are a gay, and you should be thrown off a roof by muslims.
I say that wioth love in my heart.
For the muslims who roof toss your *** ***.

It does?Cannonpointer » 12 Nov 2025, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑
AGAIN, fruity: Snowden and two dollars gets ya coffee at starbucks.