Liberal Forum

FJB » 04 Jan 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 10:52 am

**** you ***, define the term woman

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 10:38 am

Take it up with the author..

You keep insisting life is beyond self evident position in current situation adapting to the moment since conceived arguing ethical outcomes to equally incoming replacements of each reproduction's previous 4 generations lived so far.

Relative time semantics practiced last 7.000 years of organized self deception builds a better tomorrow 7 days a week than each brain being honest about why doesn't life ever stay the same each heartbeat forward now.

Woman is an adjective to a female reproduction that evolved beyond adolescence since puberty. There is an old joke "Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed." in the plant and animal kingdoms of life evolving one ancestor at a time living in series parallel results now.

Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2026, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2026, 11:25 am

you lose once again

FJB » 05 Jan 2026, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

05 Jan 2026, 9:20 am

you lose once again

When performing in a no win situation at equally alive adapting to the moment here, which side trying to disprove now is eternity wins defending economic possibilities tomorrow as living is a constant adapting to the moment here scenario of zero based budgeting each generation gap of every ancestral lineage in this species every rotation of the planet historically, current global events, tomorrow 7 times 52 weeks a planetary revolution around a star uniquely universally here?

Zeets2 » 11 Nov 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Nov 2025, 12:23 pm

Is it also "stupid" now that gas is 60 cents a gallon cheaper, eggs are $2 a dozen cheaper, and we've already received $200 billion in additional revenue from the Trump tariffs?  Will it still be "stupid" when Trump sends out rebate checks of $2000 each as a dividend on those tariffs?  Won't that more than make up for the additional $1 a pound that coffee costs?

I'm sure you'll be refusing to accept Trump's check when it comes just on principle, right Eggplant?

Now THAT'S **** stupid..

Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Jun 2026, 3:12 pm

Now THAT'S **** stupid..

Especially that people are getting paid back for the illegal tariffs now.

When is @Zeets2  sending out the checks?
 

JohnnyYou » 25 Jun 2026, 3:48 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:48 am

Especially that people are getting paid back for the illegal tariffs now.

When is @Zeets2  sending out the checks?

Oh, so you ADMIT that Trump is NOT acting like a king as he follows the rulings of the court as he's always done?
How many millions of dollars did your idiot party waste on all those foolish, "No Kings Rallies" that did nothing to support your ridiculous lie?
And do you actually believe that those getting refunds will use them to lower the costs YOU paid?

Keep dreaming, buttercup!
 

Zeets2 » 25 Jun 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 10:31 am

Oh, so you ADMIT that Trump is NOT acting like a king as he follows the rulings of the court as he's always done?
How many millions of dollars did your idiot party waste on all those foolish, "No Kings Rallies" that did nothing to support your ridiculous lie?
And do you actually believe that those getting refunds will use them to lower the costs YOU paid?

Keep dreaming, buttercup!

You are so farging stupid..

Yes, federal judges have found that the Trump administration repeatedly bypassed or defied court orders, resulting in legal battles and contempt of court proceedings.
Notable instances of this conflict with the judiciary include:

• Alien Enemies Act Deportations: U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found "probable cause" to hold the administration in criminal contempt for violating an order to halt the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. 
• Wrongful Deportation: A federal judge in Maryland considered contempt proceedings against the administration for failing to facilitate the return of a wrongfully deported individual, despite an order to do so.
• Tracking Defiance: A review by the Associated Press found that in his first 15 months since returning to office, district court judges ruled the administration violated court orders in at least 31 lawsuits involving deportations, spending cuts, and immigration. This is in addition to over 250 instances of noncompliance cited in individual immigration petitions.
• Contempt Reversal: While a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals eventually granted the administration's request to terminate the criminal contempt proceedings in June, the original findings of noncompliance marked a severe clash between the executive branch and the judiciary

 

JohnnyYou » 25 Jun 2026, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 12:55 pm

You are so farging stupid..

Yes, federal judges have found that the Trump administration repeatedly bypassed or defied court orders, resulting in legal battles and contempt of court proceedings.
Notable instances of this conflict with the judiciary include:

• Alien Enemies Act Deportations: U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found "probable cause" to hold the administration in criminal contempt for violating an order to halt the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. 
• Wrongful Deportation: A federal judge in Maryland considered contempt proceedings against the administration for failing to facilitate the return of a wrongfully deported individual, despite an order to do so.
• Tracking Defiance: A review by the Associated Press found that in his first 15 months since returning to office, district court judges ruled the administration violated court orders in at least 31 lawsuits involving deportations, spending cuts, and immigration. This is in addition to over 250 instances of noncompliance cited in individual immigration petitions.
• Contempt Reversal: While a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals eventually granted the administration's request to terminate the criminal contempt proceedings in June, the original findings of noncompliance marked a severe clash between the executive branch and the judiciary

Seems you forgot a bullet point, Johnny. 

Impeachment Articles: Multiple House Republicans, including Rep. Brandon Gill, filed articles of impeachment against Boasberg charging him with abuse of power and interfering with the executive branch's enforcement of immigration laws.

JohnnyYou » 25 Jun 2026, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 12:55 pm

You are so farging stupid..

Yes, federal judges have found that the Trump administration repeatedly bypassed or defied court orders, resulting in legal battles and contempt of court proceedings.
Notable instances of this conflict with the judiciary include:

• Alien Enemies Act Deportations: U.S. District Judge James Boasberg found "probable cause" to hold the administration in criminal contempt for violating an order to halt the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. 
• Wrongful Deportation: A federal judge in Maryland considered contempt proceedings against the administration for failing to facilitate the return of a wrongfully deported individual, despite an order to do so.
• Tracking Defiance: A review by the Associated Press found that in his first 15 months since returning to office, district court judges ruled the administration violated court orders in at least 31 lawsuits involving deportations, spending cuts, and immigration. This is in addition to over 250 instances of noncompliance cited in individual immigration petitions.
• Contempt Reversal: While a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals eventually granted the administration's request to terminate the criminal contempt proceedings in June, the original findings of noncompliance marked a severe clash between the executive branch and the judiciary

Yeah, and each time, the Trump administration appealed each of those biased opinions from liberal judges and most of them have been overturned on appeal.
Despite how much you'd love to see Trump stifled by activist left-wing judges and simply accept them, Democrats have been able to do little more than to delay the policies Trump wants, or haven't you paid attention to the number of appeals that Trump has won?

Alien illegals are STILL being deported by the thousands, spending cuts are STILL being made, Democrat waste and fraud are STILL being uncovered, and the border is STILL closed and more secure than at any time in US history.  And a "severe clash" between branches is completely irrelevant once an activist judge has his ruling overturned by a higher court.  There are NO contempt of court charges that are valid until after an appeal is adjudicated, no matter how loudly you scream over the initial ruling of a biased Obama or Biden judge when it is overturned.  
 
And you dumb liberals can't stand that fact!