Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am

Jeffrey Epstein claimed President Donald Trump knew about his abuse of women and spent time at Epstein’s house with at least one victim, according to new emails released by House Democrats on Wednesday, raising new speculation about the nature of the president’s relationship with the late financier and whether he had knowledge of Epstein’s sex trafficking scheme.

roadkill » 12 Nov 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:32 am

                                 

roadkill » 12 Nov 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:32 am

                                 

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:35 am

A rapist would never do such a thing, PedoStool

roadkill » 12 Nov 2025, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 10:00 am

Giving any thought to what the rest of yer life will be now that yer political dreams have melted away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKfvJiS35I8

Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am

Jeffrey Epstein claimed President Donald Trump knew about his abuse of women and spent time at Epstein’s house with at least one victim, according to new emails released by House Democrats on Wednesday, raising new speculation about the nature of the president’s relationship with the late financier and whether he had knowledge of Epstein’s sex trafficking scheme.

MR-7 » 12 Nov 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:42 am

They got him now....

Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am

Jeffrey Epstein claimed President Donald Trump knew about his abuse of women and spent time at Epstein’s house with at least one victim, according to new emails released by House Democrats on Wednesday, raising new speculation about the nature of the president’s relationship with the late financier and whether he had knowledge of Epstein’s sex trafficking scheme.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 10:33 am

"I did it for the children!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 9:09 am

Jeffrey Epstein claimed President Donald Trump knew about his abuse of women and spent time at Epstein’s house with at least one victim, according to new emails released by House Democrats on Wednesday, raising new speculation about the nature of the president’s relationship with the late financier and whether he had knowledge of Epstein’s sex trafficking scheme.

RebelGator » 12 Nov 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2025, 10:41 am

So you're going to abandon your cock-gobbler defense....how refreshing.