nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ Hey dickhead....
you're the guy in the world who post vanity fair links
you were a momma's boy weren't you?


nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2025, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ Cha-Ching
Just crashed the dickhead's hard drive again
nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2025, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ Cha-Ching
Just crashed the dickhead's hard drive again
You don't have the cinderblocks for that job, croneBeekeeper » 14 Nov 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ YOU live in some hate filled FANTASY WORLD, Dicksucker.
Stop before your *** gets stomped into a bloody pulp. Again.
Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ In a February 2017 exchange with Epstein, Ruemmler called Trump “so gross.”
“Worse in real life and upclose,” Epstein responded. In a separate 2017 exchange with an unidentified person, Epstein said of Trump, “your world does not understand how dumb he really is. he will blame everyone around him. for bad results.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... rcna243526
"2ndBesty!"
So **** g'ddammned stupid...
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ You don't have the cinderblocks for that job, crone
If you want to "play", post the rules...Beekeeper » 15 Nov 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ Who needs cinderblocks when you won't come out and play, ****!!!
Your MOUTH is writing CHECKS your *** can't cash!! ALL COWARDS do that ****, and you are **** #1!!
Stop RUNNING and STAND UP and see how fast your *** GETS STOMPED!!
You squeaked that already...Beekeeper » 16 Nov 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ The ONLY rule you live by is "OPEN MOUTH AND RUN LIKE A ****"!!
Come out and play, DICKSUCKER and let's see who the REAL MAN IS!!
What does that leave to not loathe?Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Epstein told Summers in the alleged email, "Recall ive told you,, -- i have met some very bad people ,, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.. so yes- dangerous," according to ABC News
Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ You squeaked that already...
Now post the rules of this "game".
OK.Beekeeper » 16 Nov 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ I did. Because you are a **** **** COWARD and don't like them, tough ****.
Now, stop running and come out and play, DICKSUCKER!!
NO question was there, ASSHOLE *******!!Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ OK.
I don't answer your questions, DICKSUCK.
I win!
Same time tomorrow?