Roshambo » 13 Nov 2025, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑ PedoRoad what about this?
Jeffrey Epstein’s Brother Says Trump Is ‘Full of S–t’ After Email Release: ‘At What Point Is There Going to Be a Reckoning?’ | Video"
Every time he opens his mouth, he says something that isn’t true," Mark Epstein says of the president
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jef ... 10730.html
Jeffrey Epstein’s brother is waiting for Donald Trump’s “reckoning” after the latest release of emails appeared to shed light on the friendship between the president and the late controversial financier.While talking to Nicole Wallace on MSNBC, Senior White House Reporter Vaughn Hillyard recounted the conversation he just had with Mark Epstein about his brother’s relationship to Trump and when people might realize he is “full of s–t.”
“The way that he put it to me was, ‘When are people going to admit to themselves that this guy, President Trump, is so full of s–t? Every time he opens his mouth, he says something that isn’t true,'” Hillyard said of his Wednesday conversation with Epstein’s brother. “He wanted to deny that he had a relationship or a friendship with Donald Trump, as Mark tells me. Back in 1999, he was on the plane when they were having intimate conversations about women on a flight from Palm Beach, Florida, back up here to New York. He said he talked to his brother – somebody he still cares deeply about even after his passing – and he says, ‘At what point is there going to be a reckoning that Donald Trump just makes up stuff?'
Democrats have Trump and the party EXACTLY where they want them (unfortunatelyroadkill » 14 Nov 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ Yer such a leftist fool. You'll believe anything that Trump is accused of. Epstein's grandma said Jeffrey's brother is a liar.
nefarious101 » 14 Nov 2025, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ there was this idiot called sumela the dickhead....his replies are almost identical to yours
you're not a pootin' sniffer are you?
Sniffin' pootin makes you dumber than ****
Scambo has assured us...this time for sure.Roshambo » 14 Nov 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Democrats have Trump and the party EXACTLY where they want them (unfortunately)
Roshambo » 14 Nov 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Democrats have Trump and the party EXACTLY where they want them (unfortunately)
Put an end to your suffering; the children will exhale in relief.
Roshambo » 14 Nov 2025, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Put an end to your suffering; the children will exhale in relief.
roadkill » 13 Nov 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ The dems wanted the Epstein files slowly leaked...so they can milk their lies.
Repubs called for all of the Epstein files to be release. For some magical reason the dems blocked that. I guess they know that their golden boys are on the list.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ0mjJZpEqY
Well, if the word of a child rapist doesn't exonerate bubba, what will, fruity?Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ In a 2015 email exchange with now-former New York Times reporter Landon Thomas Jr., Epstein referred to claims about Clinton’s presence on the island by a victim whose name has been redacted as having been made up, including “specifically minute details of a dinner had on the island with him.”
“Clinton was NEVER EVER there, never,” Epstein wrote.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... rcna243526
why is okay with you that trump blocks the release?roadkill » 13 Nov 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ The dems wanted the Epstein files slowly leaked...so they can milk their lies.
Repubs called for all of the Epstein files to be release. For some magical reason the dems blocked that. I guess they know that their golden boys are on the list.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQ0mjJZpEqY
And where would that be?Roshambo » 14 Nov 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Democrats have Trump and the party EXACTLY where they want them (unfortunately)

Over a barrel, Rube. MAGA supporters are in an uproar because he is not disclosing the list. I never imagined that my party would be the one safeguarding a list of elitist sexual offenders.
Of course it is, he is PedoRoad
Not so fast, FruityCannonpointer » 15 Nov 2025, 12:19 am » wrote: ↑ Well, if the word of a child rapist doesn't exonerate bubba, what will, fruity?
Meanwhile, epstein visited the WH 17 times during clinton's admin - zero during trump's.
I'll save you some legwork, fruitcake:
AI Overview
Jeffrey Epstein visited the White House at least 17 times between 1993 and 1995 during Bill Clinton's presidency, according to visitor logs obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
...
Separately, after Clinton left office, he traveled on Epstein's private jet on at least 17 different flight "legs" (parts of a journey) in 2002 and 2003 for trips related to the Clinton Foundation's work.
Okay - run your talking points twaddle, ya predictable hump.![]()


Have you read the Mueller Report?roadkill » 15 Nov 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ It's not OK...if that's what happened.
Are you OK with the Russian collusion hoax that the dems put out to stop Trump.
Mueller said no American was found to have colluded with the Russians. Then at the end Mueller said he couldn't prove that Trump DIDN'T do it.Roshambo » 15 Nov 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Have you read the Mueller Report?![]()
https://www.acslaw.org/wp-content/uploa ... s.7.19.pdf
Summary:
Special Counsel Mueller declined to exonerate President Trump and instead detailed multiple episodes in which he engaged in obstructive conduct
The Mueller Report states that if the Special Counsel’s Office felt they could clear the president of wrongdoing, they would have said so. Instead, the Report explicitly states that it “does not exonerate” the President10 and explains that the Office of Special Counsel “accepted” the Department of Justice policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted.
I voted for Trump three times. Silence your pissflaps.
@jerra b FYI