You ducking questions about the facts doesn't oblige me to do anything, DICKSUCKBeekeeper » 21 Nov 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Of course you don't
Because it FORCES YOU TO TAKE A STAND
Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ You ducking questions about the facts doesn't oblige me to do anything, DICKSUCK
Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ You ducking questions about the facts doesn't oblige me to do anything, DICKSUCK
That maltiepoo won't hunt, DICKSUCK.Beekeeper » 22 Nov 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑ NOT ME that never answers questions. THAT would be you, ASSHOLIO!!
Stop trying ro project YOUR **** on everyone else, DICKSUCK. It makes you look MORE STUPID than you already are.
Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2025, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ That maltiepoo won't hunt, DICKSUCK.
Now tell me what obliged Kaplan's opinion.
Beekeeper » 22 Nov 2025, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ An appeal, *******!! And you hit the nail on the head for a change, it was Kaplan's OPINION, nothing more. THE FACT REMAINS that he the JURY FOUND NO RAPE UNDER NY STATE PENAL CODE, of which KAPLAN HIMSELF instructed the jury to us in determining the issue of RAPE!!
Are you that **** STOOPID??
Oh, wait, A RHETORICAL QUESTION!! One you won't answer.
so what he wrote really does matter, doesn't it.....An appeal, *******!!