JuCo....ROG62 » 16 Nov 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ According to the statute, to which we're fully laid out in the judge's jury instructions, he raped no one...no appeal needed...
No need to, brown...you've already admitted to it...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ROG62 » 17 Nov 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ No need to, brown...you've already admitted to it...
now go play in the street...
you braggin' or complainin'?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
How stupid can you get?
What did the jury find, DICKSUCK?Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2025, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ We've been asking that question about you for over a decade now.
Because you are UNDOUBTEDLY the STUPIDEST PIECE OF LWNJ **** THAT EVER SUCKED AIR!!
Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ So tell me what's not to loathe about the rapist felon...
ON COUNT 1, RAPE, NOT GUILTY!!
That is not the jury's verdict.Beekeeper » 18 Nov 2025, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ ON COUNT 1, RAPE, NOT GUILTY!!
Want to see the VERDICT SHEET AGAIN, ASSHOLE SUCKER??
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
You can ask your boy STEPHYPOOPOLOUS how much making that "Trump is a rapist" claim cost him and ABC!!
IT says PLAINLY what that VERDICT FORM IS, *******!!Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2025, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not the jury's verdict.
The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $2million
It isn't the verdict.Beekeeper » 19 Nov 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ IT says PLAINLY what that VERDICT FORM IS, *******!!
That was the JURY'S VERDICT PERIOD YOU MORON!!
Please, SHUT THE **** UP BEFORE YOUR BRAIN EXPLODES WITH ALL THAT TDS YOU HAVE!!
OJ was found liable in a civil trial.SouthernFried » 18 Nov 2025, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, he's a "felon" and a "rapist" alright. And OJ was "innocent".
This **** bozo thinks the judicial system is right every single time.
Is Grifty appealing the verdict?Beekeeper » 19 Nov 2025, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑ IT says PLAINLY what that VERDICT FORM IS, *******!!
That was the JURY'S VERDICT PERIOD YOU MORON!!
Please, SHUT THE **** UP BEFORE YOUR BRAIN EXPLODES WITH ALL THAT TDS YOU HAVE!!
Kind of lends credence to the fact that Jury Verdicts can be worthless, like the one's you regurgitate....dontcha' think?Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ OJ was found liable in a civil trial.
You're **** idiot.
No....it doesn't.RebelGator » 19 Nov 2025, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ Kind of lends credence to the fact that Jury Verdicts can be worthless, like the one's you regurgitate....dontcha' think?
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ Is Grifty appealing the verdict?
So **** g'ddammned stupid
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ No....it doesn't.
Why do you keep yapping?
You know you're an ignorant rube....
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑ It isn't the verdict.
You don't know anything.
Watch
Is Grifty appealing the jury's verdict?
Is it a "finding" or a verdict?Beekeeper » 19 Nov 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ Does that change ANY JURY FINDING OF NOT GUILTY ON THE RAPE CHARGE??
Nope. No matter the APPEAL, that "NOT GUILTY" OF RAPE WON'T CHANGE!!
you are wrong.Nope. No matter the APPEAL, that "NOT GUILTY" OF RAPE WON'T CHANGE!!