There was no such verdict.Beekeeper » 19 Nov 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ YOU keep telling us that the NOT GUILTY VERDICT in Trump's "rape" trail doesn't matter!!
So which is is DICKSUCK??
Yeah. He got punished real good for a murder alright.Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ OJ was found liable in a civil trial.
You're **** idiot.
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ There was no such verdict.
The verdict was in favor of plaintiff, in the amount of $2million.
For an act of sexual assault defined as Rape.Beekeeper » 19 Nov 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ NOT for RAPE as you keep insisting was the case!!
Sucks, huh??
He was found liable....SouthernFried » 19 Nov 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah. He got punished real good for a murder alright.
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ For an act of sexual assault defined as Rape.
You really should read the court filings.
Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ For an act of sexual assault defined as Rape.
You really should read the court filings.
Irrelevant.Beekeeper » 20 Nov 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ Here's one for you, SUCKBOI....
Does a JUDGE have the power to CHANGE State Law to suit his/her OPINION??
Go!!
This was a CIVIL matter.Beekeeper » 20 Nov 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ According to the NY State Penal Code, at the time of trial, it wasn't!!
PERIOD!!
An UNDISPUTABLE FACT you need to learn!! Ask your boy StephyPOOPolous what that cost him to claim otherwise, DICKSUCKER!!
And the JURY found as much, aka- NOT GUILTY OF RAPE!!
Run.
Nod.
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ This was a CIVIL matter.
Read the petition and the response.
Go!
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ Irrelevant.
Stop yapping until you've read the decision.
What does the opinion say about the document you insist is the "verdict"?Beekeeper » 20 Nov 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ I did and the judge SPECIFICALLY SAID, "even though the JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED....)
And as a REAL important little detail....So the JUDGE USED THE NY STATE PENAL CODE DEFINITION OF RAPE IN HIS INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY!!
- Rape Definition: The distinction was a legal one based on the specific definition of "rape" in the New York penal code used for the jury instructions, which at the time was limited to penile penetration.
Imagine the **** out of that one, DICKSUCKER!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Isn't that why you love him?DeezerShoove » 20 Nov 2025, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ He's rich, famous, beautiful white wife, been shot...
.
He a Rap Star. Why don't you love him?
Read the documents.Beekeeper » 20 Nov 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Then SHOW US THE "CIVIL CODE" that DEFINES RAPE PRIOR TO TRUMP'S TRIAL!!
GO!!
(watch this folks, the *** KICKING IS JUST BEGINNING TODAY!!)
Maybe he should be working a fish counter...
You think that creepy **** of yours "delivered"?DeezerShoove » 20 Nov 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ You try so hard... yet just can't deliver.
Well, that was "your 1% from me".
Everything I could have hoped for.
Maybe we can try again next month.![]()
Try reading some PJ O'Rourke. It couldn't hurt.
Has he improved since I stopped doing so 30 years ago?Try reading some PJ O'Rourke. It couldn't hurt.