Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Got TDS?? Doctors getting RICH treating patients. Over 75% of whackjobs suffer!!
Got TDS?? Doctors getting RICH treating patients. Over 75% of whackjobs suffer!!
By Beekeeper
15 Nov 2025 5:31 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
20 Nov 2025 9:09 am
When you produce the "civil code" DEFINITION of RAPE prior to Trump's trial, I will!!
Until then, GO KICK ROCKS, DICKSUCK!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Nov 2025 9:11 am
That the JURY found NO RAPE OCCURRED!!Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ What does the opinion say about the document you insist is the "verdict"?
And the JUDGE'S JURY INSTRUCTIONS stated that the NY STATE PENAL CODE was to be used to define "rape", *******!!
Does it suck as bad as iit seems to be KICKED and DRAGGED AROUND BY YOUR NUTLESS SACK on this topic??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Nov 2025 9:13 am
No...that's wrong.Beekeeper » 20 Nov 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ That the JURY found NO RAPE OCCURRED!!
And the JUDGE'S JURY INSTRUCTIONS stated that the NY STATE PENAL CODE was to be used to define "rape", *******!!
Does it suck as bad as iit seems to be KICKED and DRAGGED AROUND BY YOUR NUTLESS SACK on this topic??
I don't know why you persist in trying to bluff.
You're an idiot.
20 Nov 2025 9:16 am
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ No...that's wrong.
I don't know why you persist in trying to bluff.
You're an idiot.
PROVE IT'S WRONG!!
GO!!
So easy. Kicking his *** is child's play!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Nov 2025 9:24 am
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ You think that creepy **** of yours "delivered"?
Has he improved since I stopped doing so 30 years ago?
You ask questions because you lack the self-confidence of a mature person.
Like a nervous laugh that non-impaired people grow out of through their life,
your questioning style means you really cannot take a stand.
Ergo, like so many liberals, you take the easy way...
Spineless people "go lib" because who isn't for clean environment, compassion for the downtrodden, eat-the-rich cuz they be greedy, etc?
You are the epitome of that stereotypical spineless lib...
PJ O'Rourke was a lib and turned his back on that stupid ****. About 30 years ago.
hint, hint . . .
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
20 Nov 2025 9:42 am
The Structure of the VerdictBeekeeper » 20 Nov 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ PROVE IT'S WRONG!!
GO!!
So easy. Kicking his *** is child's play!!
Both parties submitted proposed “special verdict” forms to distribute to the jury.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49, which governs jury verdict forms and questions,
“[t]he court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding
on each issue of fact.”40 A special verdict stands in contrast to a general verdict form, which
typically asks jurors to answer only the ultimate questions of liability and the damages amounts, if any.
The Court here used a special verdict form that was substantially similar to the
parties’ proposed forms, consisting of factual questions going to liability and damages, organized
by the two claims. Neither party raised any objection to the Court’s verdict form nor demanded that
any specific questions other than those on the special verdict form be submitted to the jury. In
accordance with Rule 49, the Court “g[a]ve the instructions and explanations necessary to enable
the jury to make its findings on each submitted issue” contained in the verdict form.41 Accordingly,
the meaning of the jury’s answers to each question on the verdict form depends upon the instructions
given as to what it had to conclude in order to answer the questions.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf
Take the L.So easy. Kicking his *** is child's play!!
20 Nov 2025 9:46 am
Coozie,DeezerShoove » 20 Nov 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ You ask questions because you lack the self-confidence of a mature person.
Like a nervous laugh that non-impaired people grow out of through their life,
your questioning style means you really cannot take a stand.
Ergo, like so many liberals, you take the easy way...
Spineless people "go lib" because who isn't for clean environment, compassion for the downtrodden, eat-the-rich cuz they be greedy, etc?
You are the epitome of that stereotypical spineless lib...
PJ O'Rourke was a lib and turned his back on that stupid ****. About 30 years ago.
hint, hint . . .
It was creepy.....as if you find rape funny....
now you are hysterically throwing **** at the messenger....
It's your style
20 Nov 2025 10:38 am
You pulled the rape card out of your ***....Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Coozie,
It was creepy.....as if you find rape funny....
now you are hysterically throwing **** at the messenger....
It's your style
20 Nov 2025 10:48 am
20 Nov 2025 10:51 am
this is a matter of Fact, not Faith...
20 Nov 2025 11:57 am
It would have been worth getting a medical degree just to be able to laugh in the face at these idiots over how they're suffering!Beekeeper » 15 Nov 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ Therapists are getting MASSIVELY RICH treating these idiots. Seeing how 75% of the TDS IDIOTS are NOT being treated, you know how **** SICK these assholes really are.
Ever since the 2016 presidential election, a troubling swath of Americans have developed a not-so-rare condition known as “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”Those suffering from the condition often exhibit several symptoms, including paranoia, hysteria, intense hostility toward President Donald Trump, aggression toward his supporters, and a tendency to dye one’s hair purple.
It appears that the number of people experiencing this malady has not declined over recent years. Indeed, it has actually increased, according to psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert, who discussed the matter during a recent appearance on Fox News with Harris Faulkner.
When asked to identify the condition, Alpert responded, “People are obsessed with Trump. They're fixated. They're hyperfixated on Trump.” (sound familiar, @Blackvegetable ??
He further noted that these people “can’t sleep” and that “They feel traumatized by Mr. Trump. They feel restless.”
In fact, one of his patients said she “couldn't enjoy a vacation because any time when she saw Trump in the news or on her device, she felt triggered. This is a profound pathology, and I would even go so far as to call it the defining pathology of our time.”
The therapist went on to state that Trump is the “trigger” for many of his patients. “To be that fixated on a figure, on a person, it's simply not healthy,” he continued. “Our country has strayed so far away from where we once were. If you look at in the '80s when President Reagan was shot, people were united. He famously said, ‘I hope you're all Republicans’ to the surgeons. The response was, ‘Today, Mr. President, we're all Republicans.’ But our country has lost that.”
Alpert further explained that about three quarters of his patients “will present with a lot of these symptoms” and that “within probably five minutes of seeing me, their hatred for Trump comes up.”
They're providing a valuable service for those deranged Trump haters when all they really need is a swift kick in the *** and advised to get a **** life!
20 Nov 2025 1:03 pm
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ The Structure of the Verdict
Both parties submitted proposed “special verdict” forms to distribute to the jury.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49, which governs jury verdict forms and questions,
“[t]he court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding
on each issue of fact.”40 A special verdict stands in contrast to a general verdict form, which
typically asks jurors to answer only the ultimate questions of liability and the damages amounts, if any.
The Court here used a special verdict form that was substantially similar to the
parties’ proposed forms, consisting of factual questions going to liability and damages, organized
by the two claims. Neither party raised any objection to the Court’s verdict form nor demanded that
any specific questions other than those on the special verdict form be submitted to the jury. In
accordance with Rule 49, the Court “g[a]ve the instructions and explanations necessary to enable
the jury to make its findings on each submitted issue” contained in the verdict form.41 Accordingly,
the meaning of the jury’s answers to each question on the verdict form depends upon the instructions
given as to what it had to conclude in order to answer the questions.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf
Take the L.
!!From the RULING, ASSHOLE....
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law
No RAPE UNDER NY PENAL CODE!!
YOU TAKE THE "L:", DICKSUCKER!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Nov 2025 1:09 pm
does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’Beekeeper » 20 Nov 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Oops!!
From the RULING, ASSHOLE....
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law
No RAPE UNDER NY PENAL CODE!!
YOU TAKE THE "L:", DICKSUCKER!!
Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
**** idiot.
20 Nov 2025 3:48 pm
20 Nov 2025 4:21 pm
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Coozie,
It was creepy.....as if you find rape funny....
now you are hysterically throwing **** at the messenger....
It's your style
https://youtu.be/bigZ1fmwD-Q?si=9Wyh8ePSnTNn-Y6T
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
20 Nov 2025 4:22 pm
But you are lonely and stupid, eavesdropper.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Coozie,
It was creepy.....as if you find rape funny....
now you are hysterically throwing **** at the messenger....
It's your style
No sense of humor will do that...
https://youtu.be/bigZ1fmwD-Q?si=9Wyh8ePSnTNn-Y6T
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
21 Nov 2025 5:49 am
Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2025, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑ does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’
Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
**** idiot.
Judge's OPINION does NOT change the JURY FINDING OF NO RAPE, DICKSUCK!!
PERIOD!!
Keep floundering. You took the "L"!!
See, this is easy!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
21 Nov 2025 6:42 am
Beekeeper » 21 Nov 2025, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑ Judge's OPINION does NOT change the JURY FINDING OF NO RAPE, DICKSUCK!!
PERIOD!!
Keep floundering. You took the "L"!!
See, this is easy!!
What obliged the judge to so opine?Judge's OPINION
Why did the jury award 2 million, and why is Grifty appealing?
21 Nov 2025 7:07 am
WHY did Carroll NOT GO TO THE POLICE when the alleged "rape" happened??Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ What obliged the judge to so opine?
Why did the jury award 2 million, and why is Grifty appealing?
Seeing how you think there was a CRIME, that should have been the route she took. INSTEAD, she claimed in 2019 is some **** FAILED BOOK that Trump raped her. AND NY State DHIMS wanted to destroy Trump so badly, they changed the Statute of Limitations on the "crime" to allow Civil cases to be brought. IF YOU CAN'T SEE THAT FOR WHAT IT WAS, THEN YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A **** IDIOT LOSER!!
Bottom line is that Carroll is a **** LYING **** and had ZERO EVIDENCE other than "she said" in court. THAT's the reason for the appeal, DICKSUCK!! PERIOD!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
21 Nov 2025 7:13 am
Who is online
In total there are 5643 users online :: 7 registered, 15 bots, and 5621 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, Beekeeper, Cannonpointer, nefarious101
Bots: okhttp, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, proximic, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, CensysInspect, Googlebot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, curl/7, YandexBot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google