Ima have johnny YN butt **** you in the mouth!Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I said it about your Yam Daddy..
What are you gonna do about it, Bitch?
Murdock knows a *** when he sees one, ***.JohnnyYou » 12 Jan 2026, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Evidently @Deezer Shoove and @Canonpointer are also dumber than any fifth grader golden toilet bowl achievement award you ever won.
Be Gone Satan's Salesman. Johhny You's Vacuum Bags suck way more than you.
Tell me about all of the Illegal Alien rape convictions that were based on the hearsay evidence of professional story tellers....
LOL
You want story time, take the nipple out of your mouth and ask your mama, Child.
Tell me about all of the Illegal Alien rape convictions that were based on the hearsay evidence of professional story tellers....Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ You want story time, take the nipple out of your mouth and ask your mama, Child.
Tell me about all of the Illegal Alien rape convictions that were based on the hearsay evidence of professional story tellers....Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑If you would like to report suspicious criminal activity:Call 866-DHS-2-ICE (866-347-2423) (from U.S. and Canada)
*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Jan 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Tell me about all of the Illegal Alien rape convictions
thanks for proving again that you got zero proof of rape.....
Show me....*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Jan 2026, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ thanks for proving again that you got zero proof of rape.....
If you were found guilty of rape based solely on other people's feelings and suspicions you would be screaming bloody murder.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Beekeeper » 13 Jan 2026, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Seeing how the STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS was changed explicitly for the purpose of Carroll to bring her **** CASE, WHY did it not go to CRIMINAL COURT???
Now that's one YOU WILL RUN FROM, as you ALWAYS do, because when you have to ANSWER FACTS, you GET YOUR *** KICKED MASSIVELY. Daily.
And once you RUN from this question, I'll give you the ONLY LOGICAL ANSWER OUT THER, ****!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
@ROG62 @RebelGator @Huey @MR-7
They weren't.
Hicks turned her head and spit him out?Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ They weren't.
**** idiot.
Hope Hicks restarted the clock.
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ They weren't.
**** idiot.
Hope Hicks restarted the clock.