Squatchman » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You have no evidence but trump's word that he isn't.
We all know how good that is. Not at all.
Why is he fighting the release of the Epstein files? If he isn't in them he would want to clear the air don't you think? He doesn't care about anyone but himself so we know he isn't protecting anyone but trump.
I know you love him,which is weird in itself but you have to admit his handling of the files is suspicious. If you can't you should seek professional help.
Blackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ A redacted FBI report released as part of the botched release of the Epstein files revealed that the woman told interviewers Trump had forced her to perform a sexual act on him and punched her in the side of the head after she allegedly “bit the s--t out of” his penis.
Trump is then alleged to have yelled, “Get this little b---h the hell out of here,” according to an FBI memo detailing one of Jane Doe 4’s interviews.
:rofl:
He was forced to. And if he were to follow his own legislation then Bondi should have released them in full and unredacted except for the victims names. Now that Blanche is AG why hasn't he?Beekeeper » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Trump signed LEGISLATION that REQUIRES THE RELEASE of all of the Epstein Files.
Squatchman » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He was forced to.
And if he were to follow his own legislation then Bondi should have released them in full and unredacted except for the victims names. Now that Blanche is AG why hasn't he?
Why is he fighting an order from trump unless trump wants him to?
And more to the point why are you defending the non release of the Epstein files? Are you scared that trump will be exposed and you will have voted to put a pedophile in office?
I get it,you were hornswaggled by the whole make America great again,America First **** and don't want to admit it but to come on here and defending possible pedophilia is a new low for you.
The **** dropped the 2 LAWSUITS, ASSHOLE!! So, tell us WHY SHE DID THAT??Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ Your "legal analyses" suck.
Because you're an imbecile...
RebelGator » 17 Aug 2026, 6:05 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know what the bet was, but you won't have to pay it.....rKelly starved to death after getting his hand stuck in a soda machine trying to reach up and grab a Coke Zero. The family is suing the vendor for not servicing the machine in a timely manner.....Judge Kaplan has the case scheduled on his docket.....can you believe how lucky some people are?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Just another…Beekeeper » 17 Aug 2026, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ The **** dropped the 2 LAWSUITS, ASSHOLE!! So, tell us WHY SHE DID THAT??
There's nothing to analyze OTHER than SHE HAD NO CASE!! And the odds are very good, her LIES would result in HER being in prison for PERJURY, DICKBREATH!! Which is what happens when you LIE IN COURT!!
That has to really frost your balls, huh, cupcake??![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh, and the FBI found her NOT TO BE CREDIBLE, so there's that.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ROG62 » 17 Aug 2026, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Just another…
…that was bought, used and thrown to the curb…
RebelGator » 17 Aug 2026, 6:05 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know what the bet was, but you won't have to pay it.....rKelly starved to death after getting his hand stuck in a soda machine trying to reach up and grab a Coke Zero. The family is suing the vendor for not servicing the machine in a timely manner.....Judge Kaplan has the case scheduled on his docket.....can you believe how lucky some people are?
JohnnyYou » 17 Aug 2026, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ 8 Weeks to MAGADeath. Talifreakout.. I'll leave this post subtle like BV.. I am sure he will copy and paste the text here soon.
////////Lifting the Social Security payroll tax cap has emerged as a central point of debate in the 2026 midterm elections, driven by projections that the program's trust fund faces insolvency by late 2032. Under current law, workers only pay payroll taxes on income up to $184,500/////
jerrab » 17 Aug 2026, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ ////////Lifting the Social Security payroll tax cap has emerged as a central point of debate in the 2026 midterm elections, driven by projections that the program's trust fund faces insolvency by late 2032. Under current law, workers only pay payroll taxes on income up to $184,500/////