@SouthernFried wanted to know...
@Mrkelly why you always Copping-out ****?
Jesus. How do you not know what's coming by now? Your memory is **** awful. Just awful.
1. Veghead:
“Are these your words” or posting my threads
My reply:
Didn't click it
I will not entertain your stalking by agreeing to approve of you creeping around in my profile to dig up posts.
2. Veghead:
For your “The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."
My reply:
My prompt: Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification? here is the claim that AI had said: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."AI's reply:AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.It can only:What it cannot do:
- describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
- note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
- or restate what sources claim without verifying them.
“It cannot confirm identity.” That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit. And Busted you good and busted you hard. Boom!Prompt: Attribute this photograph to Donald Trump.Reply: I can’t confirm or verify the identity of a real person in a photograph.I can describe what’s visible: the image shows an older man with light skin and swept-back blond hair, wearing a dark suit jacket, white dress shirt, and a red tie, with a small U.S. flag pin on the lapel. He has a serious expression and is photographed indoors with a softly blurred background. At most, someone might say the person resembles Donald Trump, but confirming or attributing the photograph to him as an identity claim isn’t something I can do.
- verify who the person actually is,
- confirm that an attribution is correct,
- declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.
3. For your demands/question
Reply:
**** your questions. You don't answer my questions, so I owe you nothing. ↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓Is your toothbrush REALLY clean?
4. For your usual lies about answering the survivorship Bias question
Reply:
The question is not asking for definitions.
The question is not asking what the answer is not: it is asking what it is.
5. For you accusing me of what you are guilty of.
My reply:
projecting again
6. For your incessant copying of me:
My reply:
Copies me again. pile up that evidence.
Show us the list of names, places and dates along with the complete list of criminal charges.Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ Since the 1970s, at least 28 women have accused Donald Trump of various acts of sexual misconduct, including rape, and kissing and groping without consent; ...
Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Soundtrack to the rats eating each other...
https://vimeo.com/356341853
you look to be the resident expert…Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2026, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑ It is called the "elephant walk," an all male single-file procession in the nude in which all participants are connected in a chain by holding on to the penis of the person just behind. This is not a new sport, but it is a part of the sporting atmosphere in many male athletic settings. Most recently this charming ritual was in the news at the University of Vermont where the hockey season has come to an abrupt end.
https://stars.library.ucf.edu/onsportandsociety/269/
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Soundtrack to the rats eating each other...
https://vimeo.com/356341853
Don't just ask. Answer. We should have a pool.Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Soundtrack to the rats eating each other...
https://vimeo.com/356341853
Bump.Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Soundtrack to the rats eating each other...
https://vimeo.com/356341853
The 25th is gaining momentum. Even with many right wingers.
“I think this is the ultimate stress test not just for the JAG corps but even more so for the commanders with stars on their shoulders,” he said, referring to judge advocates general. “This is the moment where their oath necessitates them having the moral courage and the professional honor to say, ‘I’ve looked at this, I’ve done the analysis, I’m leaning forward in the foxhole, but this is not a lawful target.’”Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Soundtrack to the rats eating each other...
https://vimeo.com/356341853
Blackvegetable » 16 Nov 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Soundtrack to the rats eating each other...
https://vimeo.com/356341853
Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2026, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑ “I think maybe it was staged,” announced podcaster Tim Dillon, a former staunch Trump backer. Dillon said Trump should fess up and say: “Some people are going to be upset by this, but we staged the assassination attempt in Butler to show people how important it was to vote for me and how far I was willing to go for them.”