Epstein’s emails? They may as well be your's since he can't contradict your claims, Pinocchio.jerrab » 17 Nov 2025, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑ there is new evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The push for more disclosure in the years-old sex trafficking investigation into Epstein has come roaring back since the House returned to Washington after a nearly two-month absence during the government shutdown. As lawmakers returned last week, they were greeted by new details from a tranche of Epstein’s emails, including claims that Trump had “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with a sex trafficking victim and that he “knew about the girls.”
How come you weren't interested in including the rest of that email which identifies the sex trafficking victim Trump met at Epstein's house was Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein survivor who died by suicide earlier this year, but had previously confirmed that Trump was not involved in her abuse?jerrab » 17 Nov 2025, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ more like you will say everything is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/t ... ir-release
The push for more disclosure in the years-old sex trafficking investigation into Epstein has come roaring back since the House returned to Washington after a nearly two-month absence during the government shutdown. As lawmakers returned last week, they were greeted by new details from a tranche of Epstein’s emails, including claims that Trump had “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with a sex trafficking victim and that he “knew about the girls.”
all trump has to do is release the emails.Zeets2 » 18 Nov 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ How come you weren't interested in including the rest of that email which identifies the sex trafficking victim Trump met at Epstein's house was Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein survivor who died by suicide earlier this year, but had previously confirmed that Trump was not involved in her abuse?
Apparently, you Trump-hating idiots enjoy feasting on such nothing burgers as this while under the ridiculous belief that you'll be able to find some evidence of a crime committed by him when EVERY EPSTEIN VICTIM has stated that they NEVER saw Trump on Epstein island, NOR HAD HE EVER been involved in any of the sex crimes that were perpetrated against him!
And you liberal morons can't stand that fact, so your next move will be to continue attacking Trump with the claim that he redacted all mention of his own participation and demand to see everything unredacted, regardless of any privacy issues that the victims are entitled to! But of course, that's of no consequence to liberals who will never let go of their Trump hatred, no matter how much pain it causes anyone else!
The real question is how much it's going to cost your own Democrat heroes and icons with the revelation, which WILL be revealed. We already know that scumbags like Bill and Hillary and Barack and Michele were regular visitors to his island, and their biggest donors, scum like Bill Gates and Tom Hanks who no doubt paid MILLIONS to Democrats to keep the files sealed while Biden was president. So maybe now we'll get to see and hear their victims try to weasel their way out of the criminal charges they could be faced with.
Me, I've got my popcorn ready!
https://www.npr.org/2025/08/01/nx-s1-54 ... mp-epsteinZeets2 » 18 Nov 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ How come you weren't interested in including the rest of that email which identifies the sex trafficking victim Trump met at Epstein's house was Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein survivor who died by suicide earlier this year, but had previously confirmed that Trump was not involved in her abuse?
Apparently, you Trump-hating idiots enjoy feasting on such nothing burgers as this while under the ridiculous belief that you'll be able to find some evidence of a crime committed by him when EVERY EPSTEIN VICTIM has stated that they NEVER saw Trump on Epstein island, NOR HAD HE EVER been involved in any of the sex crimes that were perpetrated against him!
And you liberal morons can't stand that fact, so your next move will be to continue attacking Trump with the claim that he redacted all mention of his own participation and demand to see everything unredacted, regardless of any privacy issues that the victims are entitled to! But of course, that's of no consequence to liberals who will never let go of their Trump hatred, no matter how much pain it causes anyone else!
The real question is how much it's going to cost your own Democrat heroes and icons with the revelation, which WILL be revealed. We already know that scumbags like Bill and Hillary and Barack and Michele were regular visitors to his island, and their biggest donors, scum like Bill Gates and Tom Hanks who no doubt paid MILLIONS to Democrats to keep the files sealed while Biden was president. So maybe now we'll get to see and hear their victims try to weasel their way out of the criminal charges they could be faced with.
Me, I've got my popcorn ready!
why did not trump tell her parents what epstein was like?Zeets2 » 18 Nov 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ How come you weren't interested in including the rest of that email which identifies the sex trafficking victim Trump met at Epstein's house was Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein survivor who died by suicide earlier this year, but had previously confirmed that Trump was not involved in her abuse?
Apparently, you Trump-hating idiots enjoy feasting on such nothing burgers as this while under the ridiculous belief that you'll be able to find some evidence of a crime committed by him when EVERY EPSTEIN VICTIM has stated that they NEVER saw Trump on Epstein island, NOR HAD HE EVER been involved in any of the sex crimes that were perpetrated against him!
And you liberal morons can't stand that fact, so your next move will be to continue attacking Trump with the claim that he redacted all mention of his own participation and demand to see everything unredacted, regardless of any privacy issues that the victims are entitled to! But of course, that's of no consequence to liberals who will never let go of their Trump hatred, no matter how much pain it causes anyone else!
The real question is how much it's going to cost your own Democrat heroes and icons with the revelation, which WILL be revealed. We already know that scumbags like Bill and Hillary and Barack and Michele were regular visitors to his island, and their biggest donors, scum like Bill Gates and Tom Hanks who no doubt paid MILLIONS to Democrats to keep the files sealed while Biden was president. So maybe now we'll get to see and hear their victims try to weasel their way out of the criminal charges they could be faced with.
Me, I've got my popcorn ready!
Naturally, because of your insane level of TDS, you make the ridiculous assumption that Trump knew the kind of perverted pedophile that Epstein was, and still accepted an invitation to visit him, despite his repeated denials that he knew anything about Epstein's exploitation of minors AND the fact that EVERY ONE OF EPSTEIN'S VICTIMS has denied EVER seeing Trump involved with any of them. Besides, the age of consent in NY is 17 anyway, so assuming Epstein's NY home was where Giuffre had sex with anyone, it was not a crime, much to your dismay I'm sure.jerrab » 18 Nov 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ why did not trump tell her parents what epstein was like?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia Giuffre spoke about Jeffrey Epstein's friendship with Presidents Donald Trump and Bill Clinton in her memoir, released six months after her death.Nobody's Girl sparked global headlines, particularly in Britain, over Giuffre's account of being trafficked by convicted sex offender Epstein and his ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17. Andrew denies the allegations. Also mentioned in the book are two political heavyweights who have been linked to Epstein and have always maintained they knew nothing about Epstein's sexual exploitation of minors.
https://www.npr.org/2025/08/01/nx-s1-54 ... mp-epstein
Zeets2 » 18 Nov 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Naturally, because of your insane level of TDS, you make the ridiculous assumption that Trump knew the kind of perverted pedophile that Epstein was, and still accepted an invitation to visit him, despite his repeated denials that he knew anything about Epstein's exploitation of minors AND the fact that EVERY ONE OF EPSTEIN'S VICTIMS has denied EVER seeing Trump involved with any of them. Besides, the age of consent in NY is 17 anyway, so assuming Epstein's NY home was where Giuffre had sex with anyone, it was not a crime, much to your dismay I'm sure.
Sounds to me like you're sweating over the coming revelation that likely has a phalanx of popular Democrats revealed as to whom have already been outed as participants. Bet you're wringing your hands with anxiety, aren't you?
"‘Enormous scandal’: Democrats worked with Epstein to remove Trump"
--------------------------------------------------------------Zeets2 » 18 Nov 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Naturally, because of your insane level of TDS, you make the ridiculous assumption that Trump knew the kind of perverted pedophile that Epstein was, and still accepted an invitation to visit him, despite his repeated denials that he knew anything about Epstein's exploitation of minors AND the fact that EVERY ONE OF EPSTEIN'S VICTIMS has denied EVER seeing Trump involved with any of them. Besides, the age of consent in NY is 17 anyway, so assuming Epstein's NY home was where Giuffre had sex with anyone, it was not a crime, much to your dismay I'm sure.
Sounds to me like you're sweating over the coming revelation that likely has a phalanx of popular Democrats revealed as to whom have already been outed as participants. Bet you're wringing your hands with anxiety, aren't you?
Zeets2 » 18 Nov 2025, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Naturally, because of your insane level of TDS, you make the ridiculous assumption that Trump knew the kind of perverted pedophile that Epstein was, and still accepted an invitation to visit him, despite his repeated denials that he knew anything about Epstein's exploitation of minors AND the fact that EVERY ONE OF EPSTEIN'S VICTIMS has denied EVER seeing Trump involved with any of them. Besides, the age of consent in NY is 17 anyway, so assuming Epstein's NY home was where Giuffre had sex with anyone, it was not a crime, much to your dismay I'm sure.
Sounds to me like you're sweating over the coming revelation that likely has a phalanx of popular Democrats revealed as to whom have already been outed as participants. Bet you're wringing your hands with anxiety, aren't you?
your whole video is biased. as long as the shut down continued the az senator would not be sworn in and her signature was needed to release the epstein files.roadkill » 18 Nov 2025, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ "‘Enormous scandal’: Democrats worked with Epstein to remove Trump"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zR5hzuKWgaE
So the unsubstantiated CLAIM is that Trump "knew" that a 17 year old girl legally had sex with someone at Epstein's house?jerrab » 18 Nov 2025, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑ --------------------------------------------------------------
The push for more disclosure in the years-old sex trafficking investigation into Epstein has come roaring back since the House returned to Washington after a nearly two-month absence during the government shutdown. As lawmakers returned last week, they were greeted by new details from a tranche of Epstein’s emails, including claims that Trump had “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with a sex trafficking victim and that he “knew about the girls.
jerrab » 18 Nov 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ all trump has to do is release the emails.
you are the one going crazy. why?

nefarious101 » 18 Nov 2025, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ you have no credibility.....I know it's hard for you to understand
low info just parroting what the pedo=prog LGBT democrat media says
doesn't know who what where or why...just being a parrot
And exactly WHY should he care about a 17 year old having sex with anyone?jerrab » 18 Nov 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ he cared about her as much he cares about the people in gaza.
jerrab » 18 Nov 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ all you do is parrot trump says.
he is the one who tried to get mtg and bobart not to sign.

nope you cant change horses.nefarious101 » 18 Nov 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump's the closest thing to want I want America to be....rid of illegals and people like you!
If you know of someone who can do a better job of "that" let me know
I can change horses but you can't
jerrab » 18 Nov 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ nope you cant change horses.
if trump does not get his way he will threaten people and say he will take away his support.
those are qualities I do not want in a US president and as long as dumb people like you support him he will be in power.
------------------------------------------
On Monday, President Trump posted on social media if an Indiana state lawmaker didn't support redistricting, he'll be "strongly endorsing against" them.

jerrab » 18 Nov 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ all trump has to do is release the emails.
you are the one going crazy. why?
South Park shows how tRump will be OK with the tRumpersjerrab » 17 Nov 2025, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑ there is new evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The push for more disclosure in the years-old sex trafficking investigation into Epstein has come roaring back since the House returned to Washington after a nearly two-month absence during the government shutdown. As lawmakers returned last week, they were greeted by new details from a tranche of Epstein’s emails, including claims that Trump had “spent hours” at Epstein’s house with a sex trafficking victim and that he “knew about the girls.”